Steven Plaut |
Original articles on Israel and related issues written by Steven Plaut, a professor at an Israeli university. |
Wednesday, June 30, 2004
1. Some of Kerry's Best Friends are friendly to Jews: http://jewishworldreview.com/0604/chafets_2004_06_29.php3 2. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1088486386301&p=1006953079865 Put ISM on trial -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDY LASH BALINT Jun. 29, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A 20-year-old IDF private in handcuffs is led into a military court on a base near Ashkelon. Some 80 supporters are there to greet him, waving Israeli flags and carrying signs reading: "Save Our Soldiers" "Free the Soldier," "Prosecute the ISM" and "No Human Shields in War Zones." The soldier, son of a poor Beduin family from the north of Israel, is accused of manslaughter in the death last year of British International Solidarity Movement member Tom Hurndall. Hurndall, product of a British public school education, was shot in Rafah in April 2003. He was making his way to an area where the IDF was operating to uncover tunnels used to convey arms and ammunition from Egypt. IDF officials say that an initial investigation, based on soldiers' accounts, indicated a Palestinian fired on a watchtower and that soldiers returned fire, hitting someone believed to be the gunman. Hurndall deliberately put himself in the area of known military operations, and took a bullet intended for a terrorist. His supporters say Hurndall was simply attempting to shield Palestinian children. But the IDF noted that ISM activities were "illegal, irresponsible, and dangerous" and led to Hurndall's "tragic death." Hurndall must have been aware of the risks inherent in his activity in Rafah. In one diary entry he wrote: "A few hundred meters away there are army snipers, and each one of us can appear in a sniper's telescopic sight. It is possible to say with certainty that they are watching us, and my life is in the hands of an Israeli marksman or settler. I know that I will probably never know what hit me, but that is part of my role to be as exposed as possible." We'll never know why Hurndall viewed his exposure as a crucial factor in bringing about peace in the Middle East, but this upper-middle-class lad from north London, before arriving in Israel, first tried his hand at being a human shield in Iraq. Hurndall had joined a group of international volunteers who wanted to put themselves in front of Iraqi schools and hospitals; but when they arrived it soon became apparent that sites would be selected by Iraqi government officials. After two weeks of heated discussion, the shields were given a list of seven sites and an ultimatum to "start shielding or start leaving." Hurndall left, passed through Jordan, where he heard about the activities of the ISM, and entered Israel on a tourist visa. It's worth noting that a number of ISMers seem to be the well-educated offspring of well-to-do parents. Hurndall attended Winchester College, one of England's most venerable and prestigious boarding schools. Tuition at the 600-year-old school is around $30,000 per year. Tom's father, Anthony Hurndall, is a well-known London property lawyer. Mother Jocelyn, who says she is proud of her son, is head of a learning support unit. Fellow ISM volunteer Radhika Sainath is a US citizen who has been arrested three times for violating Israeli law during repeated entries into the country between 2002-3. She is the daughter of two California physicians and plans on attending graduate school at Columbia University. In Hurndall's case the resources and prominence of his family enabled them to hire a high-profile British attorney to realize their efforts to prosecute an Israeli soldier for the death of their son. They chose Imran Khan, a controversial high-powered lawyer who tried to prevent then chief of staff Shaul Mofaz entering Britain for an official visit in 2002 because of "war crimes." Khan and the Hurndalls ran an effective public campaign that led to British pressure on Israel to finger an Israeli soldier for the unfortunate death of young Tom. The young Beduin soldier his name has not been released arrested in January 2004 after Hurndall's demise in a London hospital was serving his country and tried to do his part to smash terrorism. Now he too is paying the price of the ISM's unconscionable efforts to encourage their volunteers to violate closed military zones. The accused has spent the last six months in jail. His family is so poverty-stricken that they have been able to afford the bus fare to visit him only once during his incarceration. So far his legal representation has been court-assigned, although Nitsana Darshan-Leitner of the Shurat HaDin Law Center has undertaken a campaign to assist the family. In court the other day, the accused, a stocky, dark young man dressed in a plain military green uniform, sat silently as his defense attorney addressed the court. His eyes didn't engage anyone in the room neither the witness nor the dozens who had come to support him seemed to be of interest. The three judges in the small, wood-paneled courtroom listened intently as a military interrogator answered questions about the interrogation and confession extracted from the accused. How could the court take this written, six-page confession seriously, asked the attorney, when the defendant neither reads nor writes Hebrew? Why did interrogators have the defendant sign the confession at night, at the end of more than nine hours of interrogation, when he was tired and hungry, after he had allegedly stated: "Give me a cup of coffee and a cigarette, and I'll sign anything."? "The soldier is being scapegoated by the prosecution to appease the British Foreign Office," charged Darshan-Leitner. Worse than that, noted Shimon, one of the supporters who had bussed down from Jerusalem. "It's the wrong entity on trial here. It's the ISM who should be sitting there accused, not this soldier, who was doing his best to defend us from terrorist evil." The writer is author of Jerusalem Diaries: In Tense Times. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1088486386301&p=1006953079865 3. Campus Fascists: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14021 Tuesday, June 29, 2004
If there were any longer any doubt as to the inability of the "Security Wall" to protect Israeli children from Palestinian terror and fascism, yesterday removed it. After some 300 attacks on Israel by the PLO using Kassam rockets, none of which previously killed anyone, yesterday's attack murdered a four year old toddler in the Negev town of Sderot and the child's grandfather. Such is the reward for Israel having exercised "restraint" and turning the other cheek after each of the previous 300 rocket attacks. Thus goeth the ridiculous leftist canon holding that the PLO will reach some sort of emotional catharsis by firing rockets at Israel for a while and then cooling down to make peace. SO much for the view that Israel can just build a wall and then forget about them, without utilizing military control of the ground on the other side of the fence. I have argued for years that Israel should massively retaliate for each and every ATTEMPTED murder by the PLO as if the murder actually "succeeded". My government thinks that would be insensitive and offend the politically correct folks. So what is my government offering instead? More talk about the RRH doctrine. RRH stands for "realy really hard". After each atrocity, my government threatens that if the attacks do not stop, Israel will respond "really really hard". Apparently my government wants to defeat the terrorists by making them laugh themselves to death. SO how is the government responding to yesterday's double murder? By threatening a RRH retaliation soon. Get ready for a new attack on an empty PLO building at night. 1. Refugee Yuppies: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13977 2. Taking Orders from Yassir: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14006 (open web page to see accompanying photos) Taking Orders From Arafat By Steven Plaut FrontPageMagazine.com | June 29, 2004 In recent days, the pro-terror far-leftists and self-proclaimed "anarchists" from the ISM, or International Solidarity Movement, have been making both increased trouble and headlines here in Israel. They have repeatedly attacked Israeli police and soldiers, using violence, as part of their campaign to show their support for the violent Palestinian terrorists. They attempt to vandalize and sabotage Israel's security fence, to show their opposition to all attempts by Israel to protect its children from mass murderers and suicide bombers. Israelis have long been at a loss to explain the reluctance of their government to send these Western pro-terror "peace activists" packing or to imprison them. In the past, some pro-terror "activists" have gone so far as to hide wanted terrorists in their offices and to hide arms used by them. This week, in an uncharacteristic decision but hopefully one showing a new direction, the Tel Aviv District Court ordered American leftist activist Ken O'Keefe deported for trying to enter the Gaza Strip illegally. O'Keefe was caught trying to cross the separation fence into the Gaza Strip near the settlement of Dugit after arriving in Israel three weeks ago, and after having signed a statement pledging not to enter the Gaza Strip. District Court Judge Sarah Gadot determined, based on intelligence reports, that O'Keefe was a security risk and had violated military orders by infiltrating an area controlled by the army, after he had been warned against it and stated his intention to retry. The judge also determined that O'Keefe had ignored a sign in English indicating the location of the border. O'Keefe claimed that the border was not a recognized international frontier and the sign was misleading. In other words, he was of the rather common opinion that leftists should be exempt from obeying the law. O'Keefe claims he had organized hundreds of Americans and citizens of other Western countries to act as "human shields" in Iraq. O'Keefe said he had come to Israel at the beginning of the 2003 Iraq war to advance "peace" (or at least the leftist interpretation of the term) between Israelis and Palestinians. His attorney, Yael Barda from the Far-Left anti-Zionist organization Gush Shalom, claimed that although her client was eccentric, he was not a security risk. But the true face of these "caring peace lovers", in the Middle East to support the terrorists, was unmasked this week in a different development. According to a news story in the Israeli leftist daily Haaretz this week, it was revealed that the "international solidarity protesters" and the rest of the Far-Leftist demonstrators, in town trying to sabotage Israel's security fence, are taking their orders and directions directly from Yassir Arafat. They met with Arafat this week in his terrorist headquarters in Ramallah to hear his orders and instructions for them regarding how they should run their "peace" protests against Israel's security fence. Arafat ordered them to escalate the violence of their demonstrations, especially at two locations, near Jerusalem and near the Jewish town of Ariel, and to escalate the level of the protests just before the "World Court" in the Hague is to meet to discuss Israel's fence. In sum, the terrorist Arafat is dictating tactics and timing to the Western peace poseurs and solidarity-meisters for the Islamic revolution. On the other hand, this week witnessed one of the most successful anti-terror actions by Israel to date, and it was one that will have a greater impact on the terror and on the pro-terror leftists than the construction of the security wall itself. Israel carried out a sort of Godfather-movie set of hits on the number-one leaders of all three major terrorist organizations in Nablus. Not only were the three terrorist dons all killed in a single day, but so were seven other terrorists with them; several were also in leadership positions. The peace-loving and caring Left of course will be outraged and will escalate its violent protests against Israeli self-defense. After all, how dare Israel assassinate the Palestinian terrorists instead of capitulating to them? Protesters scuffle with an Israeli soldier during a demonstration against the construction of the Israeli security barrier, near the West Bank village of Iskaka, June 17, 2004. Part wall and part fence, the barrier, if completed, will run for 640km (397 miles) through the West Bank. Israel hopes the barrier will prevent suicide bombings. REUTERS/Ammar Awad. Arab protester punches soldier during a demonstration against the construction of the Israeli security barrier. "Peace protester" kicks soldier's knee during a protest against the construction of the Israeli security barrier. Arab "peace protester" kicks soldier who refuses to use his gun. Arab protesters attack soldiers while European ISM members push attackers forward. Arab peace protestors attack soldiers trying to protect civilians. Foreign ISM activist arrested by Israeli police during a protest in the West Bank village Iskaka against the construction of Israel's separation barrier. 3. Dan Pipes is a great Jewish natural resource: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14004 4. Chomsky News: http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/media1.htm 5. What happens when the US implements Peresism: http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0%2C4057%2C9975925%255E401%2C00.html Sunday, June 27, 2004
1. According to a news story in Haaretz today, interestingly NOT in the English web site run by the Palestinian newspaper published in Hebrew, it is revealed that the "solidarity international protesters" an dth erest of the Far-Leftist demonstrators trying to sabotage Israel's security fence to make it easier for the PLO to murder Jewish children, are taking their orders and directions directly from Yassir Arafat. Yes, they met with Arafat yesterday to hear his orders regarding how they should run their "peace" protests against Israel's security fence. Arafat is dictating tactics and timing. Yesterday he told them to escalate the sabotage and violence of their protests. What this means is that the "ISM" International Solidarity Movement to which arch-bimbo Rachel Corrie belonged before becoming pancaked, (its name should really be "I Support Murderers") is nothing more than an appendage of the PLO, and the same is true of the Israeli local home-grown "peace groups" attacking the wall. Meanwhile, yesterday saw one of the most successful anti-terror actions by Israel to date, and it was one that will have a greater impact on the terror and on the pro-terror leftists than the construction of the wall itself. Yesterday Israel carried out a sort of St. Valentine's Day hit on the number one leaders of all three major terrorist organizations in Nablus. Not only were the three terrorist dons all killed in a single day, but so were seven other terrorists with them, several of these also being terrorist leaders (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1088143074422). The peace-loving and Caring Left of course will be outraged and will escalate its violent protests against Israeli self-defense. After all, how DARE Israel assassinate the mass murdering Palestinian nazis instead of capitulating to them? 2. Haaretz Sanitizes His Ugliness: Jun. 26, 2004 http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1088231179041 INSIDE ISRAEL - THE OSLO WAR NOTWITHSTANDING, RADICAL LEFT POLITICS AS USUAL A squeaky clean Arafat emerges from a Ha'Aretz rehab By EFRAIM INBAR JERUSALEM POST === "It requires an incredible amount of self-delusion, or hutzpa, to try today to sell the Israeli public the story that Arafat remains the right partner for peace. The intellectual arrogance of messianic doves and their condescending attitude toward the rest of us assumes we all are limitlessly gullible." Ha'aretz [Israel's radical Left daily newspaper] has adopted an uncharacteristic dose of "religiosity" by becoming the vehicle for a pathetic attempt by the Israeli radical Left to politically resurrect Yasser Arafat. The newspaper claims that Arafat was not the instigator of the September 2000 intifada but has consistently searched for a two-state solution in his quest for peaceful coexistence. Haaretz also published an interview with the Palestinian leader which refrained from posing difficult questions. Arafat was allowed to portray himself as a man of peace. Israeli messianic doves have repeatedly saved Arafat from oblivion. Yossi Beilin and the crowd around him saved Arafat in 1993 at a time when the PLO was weak due to its strategic blunder of supporting Saddam Hussein in the 1991 Gulf War. The group, isolated in Tunis, was on the verge of bankruptcy. But Beilin et al persuaded Yitzhak Rabin - against his better judgment - to enter into a deal with the PLO, which brought Arafat to the White House, allowed the PLO to regain its dwindling international status, and gave it a territorial foothold in the territories. These same doves never stopped advocating - as if out of religious conviction - increasingly larger Israeli concessions and a policy of turning a blind eye to the Palestinian violations of the Oslo agreements. The failure of Arafat to honor his pledge to Rabin and desist from terrorist activities was invariably explained away. The PLO chief's repeated calls for jihad were belittled as insignificant rhetoric. Early Israeli casualties resulting from Palestinian terrorism were seen as "sacrifices for peace." But peace did not come. It took the majority of Israelis more than a decade and over 1,000 dead to realize the murderous nature of the Palestinian national movement. The swing in public opinion to a more realistic assessment of the conflict is the reason for the recent attempt by the radical Left to rewrite history. The late-1990s evaluation by Israeli intelligence of Arafat's intentions on final status issues does not in fact matter very much. There was no dispute within the Israeli intelligence community that Arafat had no intention of keeping his promise to stop employing violence. Israeli intelligence supplied information months in advance about Palestinian preparations for armed conflict. Intelligence specialists thought hostilities could be anticipated around September 2000. In this respect Israeli intelligence functioned well and provided the IDF with a strategic warning. The army consequently trained for the expected low-intensity conflict and took several measures to contain Palestinian violence. Any attempt to rehabilitate Arafat's credibility runs against his record of behavior after September 2000. His speeches unequivocally laud the suicide-bombers and armed struggle; he was personally involved in funding terrorist cells; he consistently rejected numerous attempts to implement a cease-fire; and he has continuously opposed any reform in the security sector that might have reduced the violence. In Arafat's recent interview with Haaretz he continued to demand the "right of return" and refused to accept any historical Jewish claim over the holiest place to Jews - the Temple Mount. It requires an incredible amount of self-delusion, or hutzpa, to try today to sell the Israeli public the story that Arafat remains the right partner for peace. The intellectual arrogance of messianic doves and their condescending attitude toward the rest of us assumes we all are limitlessly gullible. Another reason for the timing of the campaign to revive Arafat is Sharon's success in marginalizing him. The common wisdom in Washington and other important capitals - including Arab ones - is that Arafat is an obstacle to peace, and ways need to be devised to neutralize his negative influence. Radical doves understand that only Israel can provide a "kosher certificate" to Arafat that might grant him persona-grata status in the international arena. Similarly to the early 1990s, it is Israeli leftists obsessed with the Palestinian issue who are trying to bail Arafat out from a difficult predicament. It is clear that Arafat's war, a colossal miscalculation that brought the Palestinians in the territories a great deal of suffering, has ended in failure. There is no Palestinian state in sight. Much of the infrastructure for such a state has been destroyed in the "armed struggle," leaving Palestinian society fragmented and run by thugs and local warlords. In addition, the international community increasingly views the Palestinians as unable to govern themselves. In contrast, Israeli society has shown greater resilience than expected in the protracted conflict. The IDF has successfully overcome international constraints on its freedom of military action against targets in Palestinian-ruled territories, thus denying the enemy safe sanctuaries. Only the Israeli radical Left is misguided enough to try to resuscitate Arafat. While it definitely deserves him, it is the rest of us who will pay dearly if this foolish exercise is even marginally successful. The writer is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and director of its Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies. 3. Harassing Bay Area Jews: http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ViewsPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Article%5El3773&enZone=Views&enVersion=0& and see also http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/22826/format/html/displaystory.html 4. Leftist Brownshirts: http://www.midstreamthf.com/ The Brownshirts of Our Time Phyllis Chesler On Saturday evening, November 8, 2003, the eve of Kristallnacht, I addressed a womans networking conference of mainly African-American and Hispanic-American womanists and feminists at Barnard College. The conference was described as a grassroots, multi-cultural, multi-generational, and multi-disciplinary organization for women in the arts. Indeed, the women seemed to range in age from 20 to 65 and were dressed in corporate business suits, ever-colorful African/ethnic attire, and youthful jeans. The conference was closed to men but one of the organizers made a split-second decision to allow my adult son in and seated him by himself at the very back of the room on a chair set apart. In retrospect, I realized that I should have known what was coming. A few days before the conference, I had the following conversation with one of the organizers. She asked me what my most recent book was, and I told her it was The New Anti-Semitism. I explained that Jew-hatred was a form of racism only it was not being treated as such by anti-racist politically correct people. The organizer did not say: I dont agree with you, or This wont play well to our constituency. She only said: We need you to explain the ways in which women sabotage each other and remain divided. We need you to talk about your book Womans Inhumanity to Woman. Your speech will precede our big Unity panel. When I arrived, performers were rapping and singing and dancing, and the energy was fabulous. I whispered to my son, Perhaps I have become too obsessed with The Jewish Cause, with Israel. Maybe I need to remember that I am also connected to more than one issue. I had been asked to talk about what women can do, psychologically and ethically, in order to enact sisterhood and to work in productive, even radical ways. As I spoke, the women in the audience sighed, cheered, applauded, nodded in agreement, laughed, groaned. It was a half hour of good vibes. And then my first questioner blew it all to hell. All it took was The Question, and it only required one questioner. I could not see who was speaking. A disembodied voice demanded to know where I stood on the question of the women of Palestine. Her tone was forceful, hostile, relentless, and prepared. I could have said: The organizers have specifically asked me not to address such questions. I could also have said: I am concerned with the women of Palestine, but I am also concerned with the women of Rwanda, Bosnia, Guatemala, who have all been gang-raped by soldiers who used rape as a weapon of war; I am concerned with the poverty and homelessness of women right here in America; I am concerned with the women of Israel who are being blown up in buses, at cafes, in their own bedrooms. I did not say this. Instead, I took a deep breath and said that I did not respect people who hijacked airplanes, or hijacked conferences, or who, at this very moment, were trying to hijack this lecture. She grew even more hostile and demanding. Tell this audience what you said on WBAI. I heard you on that program. Clearly, she wanted to unmask me before this audience as a Jew-lover and an Israel-defender. I took the question head-on. If youre really asking about apartheid, let me talk about it. Contrary to myth and propaganda, Israel is not an apartheid state. The largest practitioner of apartheid in the world is Islam, which practices both gender and religious apartheid. In terms of gender apartheid, Palestinian women and all women who live under Islam are oppressed by honor killings, in which girls and women who are raped are then killed by family members for the sake of restoring the family honor; by forced veiling, segregation, stonings to death for alleged adultery, seclusion/sequestration, female geni-tal mutilation, polygamy, outright slavery, and sexual slavery. I continued, Islam also specializes in religious apar-theid as well. All non-Muslims have historically been viewed and treated as sub-humans who must either convert to Islam or be mercilessly taxed, beaten, jailed, murdered, or exiled. The latest Al-Qaeda attack in Saudi Arabia was primarily directed against Lebanese Christians and Americans. I further continued, Today, the entire Middle East is judenrein there are no Jews left in 22 Arab countries. And, the Arab leadership has backed the PLO strategy in which the 23rd state remains under constant and perilous siege. Historically, in general, but specifically since 1948-1956, Arab Jews were forced to flee Arab Islamic lands. Jews cannot become citizens of Jordan, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia, for example, and yet no one accuses those nations of apartheid. I told the truth. Clearly, they had not heard it before. The audience gasped collectively. Then, people went a little crazy. Someone muttered darkly, coarsely, in a near-growl: What about the checkpoints? What about the fence? I asked the audience if they thought that being detained at a checkpoint was really the same as having your clitoris sliced off, the same as being stoned to death for alleged adultery. The only response I got was from the first questioner who demanded that I denounce Ariel Sharon but not Yasir Arafat as a murderer. I absolutely refused to do so. As I left the podium, a young African-American woman stopped me to say that Id hurt her by how I had disrespected a brown woman. What brown woman? I asked. Your first questioner was a brown woman, she said, and so are Palestinian women. I said: Jewish women, especially in Israel, also come in many colors, including brown and black. She stopped me. But youre a white Jew. As if this was proof of a crime. The three young African-American women who had invited me were very supportive of me. They hugged me and thanked me for coming and looked rather embarrassed about what had happened. Whats important is this not one of them tried to stop what was happening, not one stood up and said: Something good has just turned ugly, and we must not permit this to happen. Thus, the good people did nothing to disperse the hostility or to address the issues. Perhaps they were simply unprepared on the issues. Perhaps they agreed with the view that Israel is an apartheid state and that anyone who would dare defend it was supposed to be treated as a traitor and an enemy. Perhaps they simply lacked the courage to stand up to the fundamentalists in their midst. I couldnt help reflecting on my lifes work against racism. For example, in 1963, I joined The Northern Student Movement and tutored Harlem students. In the late 1960s, I was involved with both the Young Lords and the Black Panthers. I marched outside the Womens House of Detention when they jailed Angela Davis. I was involved in the Inez Garcia case and have written extensively about the cases of both Joanne Little and Yvonne Wanrow, two women of color who, like Garcia, had killed (white) men in self-defense. In the mid-70s, I interviewed Jews from India, Iran, Afghanistan, and North Africa, and Jews who had fled Arab lands about cultural or ethnic racism in Israel. By the early 1970s, I also began organizing against Jew-hatred on the left and among feminists in America. For nearly 30 years, I taught working-class people and students of color at a public university. I admired and loved them and was sometimes able to help them in ways that changed their views and their lives. Heres whats sad. Clearly, my speech touched hearts and minds; there was room for common ground and for civilized discourse. But not once was the word Palestine uttered not when Palestine is seen as a symbol for every downtrodden group of color who are resisting the racist-imperialist American and Zionist empires. Once the Palestine litmus test of political respectability was raised, everyone responded on cue, as if programmed and brainwashed. It immediately became a white versus brown thing, an oppressed versus an oppressor thing. These are the Brownshirts of our time. The fact that they are women of color, womanists/feminists, is all the more chilling and tragic. And unbelievable. And to me practically unbearable. Afterwards, my son, ever wise, said, Well, mom, you have your answer. The Jew-haters will never allow you into their wider, wonderful world. You cant go back.[ About the author Phyllis Chesler, a prominent feminist intellectual, is the author of 12 books. Her most recent book, The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It, is reviewed in this issue of Midstream on p. 40. The above pieces first appeared online in FrontPageMagazine.com on November 19, 2003 and December 4, 2003, and are reprinted by permission. 5. Prof. Ben Ami's Jihad: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=Avi+Garfinkel&update_date=25%2F06%2F2004++01%3A46&itemNo=443113 6. Poor poor terrorists: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13865 7. Meanwhile, back in the University of Duh: Two Polls: Palestinians Support Fighting Israel Until It Is Destroyed by Amira Hass Ha'aretz June 24, 2004 Two Palestinian public opinion polls published in the beginning of the week confirm that most Palestinians support fighting Israel until it is destroyed. According to a Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre (JMCC) poll, 63.6% either strongly or partially oppose ceasing all types of "militant activity" inside Israel. JMCC also found that 45.5% believe that the final aim of the intifada is to "free all Palestinian land" (including Israel). A poll by the Bir Zeit University's Development Studies Program found that 54% doubt the possibility of Israeli-Palestinian coexistence in the framework of a peace agreement, and 61% support continuing the "armed struggle" following an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. The strong support for "militant activity," disregarding the facts on the ground, reveals a political weakness camouflaged by hopeless "military" dreams. Friday, June 25, 2004
1. The Problem with Jewish Liberals: http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3539.html 2. http://news.myway.com/top/article/id/411289%7Ctop%7C06-24-2004::18:06%7Creuters.html Army Told Not to Use Israeli Bullets in Iraq Jun 24, 5:56 PM (ET) WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Israeli-made bullets bought by the U.S. Army to plug a shortfall should be used for training only, not to fight Muslim guerrillas in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. lawmakers told Army generals on Thursday. Since the Army has other stockpiled ammunition, "by no means, under any circumstances should a round (from Israel) be utilized," said Rep. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, the top Democrat on a House of Representatives Armed Services subcommittee with jurisdiction over land forces. The Army contracted with Israel Military Industries Ltd. in December for $70 million in small-caliber ammunition. The Israeli firm was one of only two worldwide that could meet U.S. technical specifications and delivery needs, said Brig. Gen. Paul oblem with , the Army's program executive officer for ammunition. The other was East Alton, Illinois-based Winchester Ammunition, which also received a $70 million contract. Although the Army should not have to worry about "political correctness," Abercrombie was making a valid point about the propaganda pitfalls of using Israeli rounds in the U.S.-declared war on terror, said Rep. Curt Weldon, the Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the subcommittee on tactical air and land forces. "There's a sensitivity that I think all of us recognize," Weldon told the Army witnesses, including Maj. Gen. Buford Blount, who led the U.S. Third Infantry Division that captured Baghdad in April 2003. als, now the Army's assistant deputy chief of staff, said the Army had sufficient small caliber ammunition -- 5.56mm, 7.62mm and .50 caliber -- to conduct current operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. But taken together with training needs, the United States had strained its production facilities, he testified. "To fight a major combat operation in another theater will require the Army to impose restrictions on training expenditures and to focus current inventory and new production on combat operations," Blount said. As a result, he said the Army hoped to stretch U.S. supplies to supplement the capacity of the government-owned Lake City plant in Independence, Missouri, that currently makes more than 90 percent of U.S. small caliber ammunition. The Lake City factory, operated by Alliant Techsystems Inc., has nearly quadrupled its production in the past four years. This year, it will produce more than 1.2 billion rounds, Karen Davies, president of the ATK arm that runs it, told the panel. Lake City provided more than 2 billion rounds a year during World War II and Vietnam, she said. The Army's needs will grow to about 1.5 billion to 1.7 billion rounds a year in coming years, Blount said. "In the near-term, balancing training requirements with current operational needs is a manageable risk-mitigation strategy," he said. The Army does not want to repeat its history of building capacity during wartime "only to dismantle it in peacetime," Blount added. 3. Israeli Academics In Favor of Suppressing Israeli Sovereignty: http://oznik.com/petitions/010427signers.html 4. Competing to see who can be the most anti-Israel: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040624/ap_en_tv/britain_bbc_arabic_channel 5. Ben Shapiro's latest: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20040623.shtml# 6. Campus Atrocities: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13913 7. Pity the poor terrorists: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13865 Wednesday, June 23, 2004
When challenged about their opening Felix Dzerzinsky College at Tel Aviv University (Felix Dzerzinsky founded the KGB under Lenin), the campus commissars will no doubt spout the usual "academic freddom" cliches, although nothing in academic freedom means free unpaid use of taxpayer financed campus facilities is an automatic entitlement for anyone off the street. But there is a more important point I should have mentioned. A few years back we posted a story about a senior lecturer at the business school at Tel Aviv University, associated with the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, who petitioned the university authorities on behalf of a group of religious women students to be allowed to us empty classrooms in off-hours to study Talmud and the weekly Torah portions. The university turned them down flat. THAT would have been inappropriate use of campus facilities, unlike setting up a Stalinist Indoctrination College on campus, run by the communist party apparatchiks. Also, you may recall that when Tel Aviv University decided to accept a large donation from a Swiss industrialist to build a synagogue building on campus, some leftist faculty and students held angry protests aginst the decision, maintaining that a synagogue would pollute the largely secularist campus. I guess Judaism pollutes Tel Aviv University, but not Stalinism. 1. It is conservatively estimated that communism directly caused about 100 million deaths in the twentieth century. These of course include the millions starved to death by communist forced collectivization of agriculture, by the intentional famines in the Ukraine and in China, and by the massive shortages and upheavals and repressions, not to mention the Gulags and mass murders. In China, massive cannibalism was produced by communist food shortages, where families swapped children so parents would not be forced to eat their own children. A disproportionate number of those killed by communism were Jews. Jews were always subjected to special venom and animosity by communists, and the fact that some of the communist leaders and "thinkers" were Jews or ex-Jews does not change anything, in fact it probably explains the anti-Semitism that has always characterized both communism and some forms of anti-communism. Communists today lead the movement for a Second Holocaust of Jews. They seek the annihilation of Israel and its population. The communist countries have always been allied with Arab fascism and aggression and today support Islamist terror. All of which might have been regarded by most people as more than a sufficient reason why a College of Communist Indoctrination should not operate within the auspices of Tel Aviv University. But they would be wrong. Today is the inauguration ceremony of the opening of the College of Communist Indoctrination at Tel Aviv University. Really. The official name of the "college" is the "Socioeconomic College", and it operates on the Tel Aviv University campus, although evidently not with direct funding by the Israeli taxpayer, at least not yet. The comrades will, however, be using the university facilities paid for by Israeli taxpayers. The initiator of the College of Communist Indoctrination is Madame Gulag, Tamar Gozansky, who was until recently the Stalinist Rent-a-Jew sitting in the Knesset as representative for the Hadash Stalinist Party in the Israeli parliament. Hadash is an Old-Left anti-Israel Arab-national communist party, one that never quite got around to renouncing Stalinism. Mademe Gulag has been unemployed, as are most people under communism, ever since her own party got tired of her hogging one of its parliament seats. So she and her fellow commissar, a lawyer named Aviv Wasserman, came up with the idea. They decided they were sick and tired of the "capitalist hegemony in Israeli academia" (in their words see Haaretz July 23, 04), and you can see right away how someone who had spent the last few decades in some other galaxy might not be aware of the Far-Leftist hegemony that actually operates in Israeli academia. Students in this new re-education Gulag center to open at Tel Aviv University will be indoctrinated in the "theories" of Marxism that were totally debunked more than 160 years ago. They will learn the communist party's principles and its correct thinking about class struggle and other "social issues". The "college" will be administered by a newspaper journalist named Efraim Davidi. Its "degree" will not be recognized at first as a bona fide academic degree, although it might be enough to get you a job in a Cuban torture facility. The "faculty" at the "college" will consist of the usual Israeli Far-Leftist tenured radicals, including a Marxist economist from Ben-Gurion University, the extremist "Post Zionist" Moshe Zuckerman from Tel Aviv University, the Stalinist Dov Hanin who was supposed to replace Madame Gulag as the Hadash Party Rent-a-Jew but the party decided to do without further Jewish reps, some Arab non-academics whose academic credentials are that they are anti-Israel, and others. They do not get paid, I guess as there way of showing what happens to employees under communist regimes. If you think that Israeli taxpayer money should not be spent on providing infrastructure for Stalinist indoctrination, please write to Minister Limor Livnat at Minister Limor Livnat Ministry of Education Minister's Office Kiryat Ben Gurion Jerusalem Fax 972-2-6753726 Email: llivnat@knesset.gov.il If you want to tell the heads of Tel Aviv University what you think of this new "college" on their campus, contact: President of Tel Aviv U: Prof. Itamar Rabinovich His fax and email are FAX 03-6422379 itamarr@tauex.tau.ac.il Here is a list of other university officers (you will need to look up their addresses if you want to contact): http://www.tau.ac.il/officers-eng.html You may want to let any donors to TAU know about what is going on! 2. It has been a while since we told you about the Haifa Municipal Museum. Under Comrade-Mayor Amram Mitzna's junta, the Museum took off in a far-Left direction. It had an exhibit in which a work of "art" was a portrait showing a yeshiva student being hanged from a gallows. Had the portrait been of, say, a leftist politician being hanged, the artist in question would be rotting in jail for incitement to murder as we speak. Other manifestations of the Mapplethorpianism of Israeli art were also on display. But Mitzna is off warming a back bench in the Knesset. We got Mitzna out of City Hall but did not get Mitznaism out of the Haifa Municipal Museum. You may recall how a few months back a fanatic ex-Israeli anti-Semitic leftist living in Sweden produced a work of "art" showing the woman mass murder who blew up the Haifa Maxim restaurant as a pure Snow White? Celebrating her act of barbarism, which murdered 23 people, including many children and three generations of two families? The Israeli Ambassador vandalized the "art" to the horrors of the artsy-phartsy crowd. Well, now the Haifa Municipal Museum ran its own analogue to Snow White the Pure Murderer of Jewish Children. A Bimbo "artist" named Deganit Brest produced a work of "art" centered around a fine handsome smiling face of the peace partner suicide bomber who murdered all the children a few years back waiting to enter the Tel Aviv Dolphinarium for a dance party. Twenty one people were murdered, most high school kids, many recent immigrants from the ex-Soviet Workers Paradise that Tel Aviv University is now trying to recreate. The Museum saw nothing at all wrong with the "art" celebrating the nazi murderer of children. The public however was nonplussed and now the Museum is thinking of taking down the atrocity. Brest is outraged of course, as are the usual Far Leftists. Maybe a new portrait of The Suffering of My Hero Adolf Hitler, or maybe Eichmann the Misunderstood, will replace it. If you would like to tell the Haifa Muni reps what you think of this, go to http://www.haifa.muni.il/Hebrew/ContactusHome.htm (you will see Hebrew fonts or gibberish, but hit the first two "envelope icons" to set up a page to contact them, and then hit send. Also, try http://www.haifa.muni.il/English/Default.htm Tuesday, June 22, 2004
1. As you robably know, the viciously anti-Semitic "International Solidarity Movement", the pro-terror "anarchists" in their designer jeans and Nikes, is planning a "summer of pro-terror action" in the PLO-occupied Jewish lands of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The ISM, which really should stand for "I Support Murderers", is the extremist group of Rachel Corrie, who found herself flattened when protecting terrorist smuggling tunnels into Gaza from Egypt, through which the explosives are smuggled that blow up Jewish children - that is, protecting the houses hiding the tunnels from an army bulldozer whose driver could not see her. ISM openly endorses PLO terror and "armed struggle" against Jewish children. Here is a slice from the ISM call for action in support of the terrorists: INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT Join the Palestinian struggle for freedom and human rights Freedom Summer Palestine June 25 - August 19, 2004 We need you to help make this campaign a success! Please join. For more information, see: http://www.palsolidarity.org/ Given the ISM determination to ship in loads of preppy cheerleaders for terror, I was inspired to compose some new poetry about teh ISM campaign. So here is: Bulldozer Bill the Soldier (the song of the International Solidarity Movement Maiden) To the tune of Barnacle Bill the Sailor (clean version) Who's defending terror gore? Who's defending terror gore? Who's defending terror gore? It's the numbskull maiden! Out of the way, you twit I say, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier, Out of the way, you twit I say, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier. I won't let you crush this house, I won't let you crush this house, I won't let you crush this house, Said the dingbat maiden. Beneath yonder house, Run terrorist louse Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier, The tunnel there runs For bombers and guns, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier. I shall shield them with my bod, I shall shield them with my bod, I shall shield them with my bod, Said the preppy maiden. Solidarity, balls, they are murderers alls, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier, Solidarity, balls, they are murderers alls, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier. We will serve to help them kill, We will serve to help them kill, We will serve to help them kill, Said the commie maiden. While I get no real kicks, you to pancake mix, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier, While I get no real kicks, you'll be pancake mix, Said Bulldozer Bill the Soldier. 2. In case you missed this first round: http://www.acpr.org.il/english%2Dnativ/issue1/plaut-1b.htm 3. Excellent Backgrounder: http://www.afsi.org/OUTPOST/2003SEP/sep3.htm 4. Defend the Rights of Israeli Gazelle Eaters! What, No Whale Meat? by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz June 16, 2004 The inability of an Israeli to obtain a ham sandwich whenever he likes, wherever he likes, is seen by Israel's Supreme Court as an unreasonable violation of free trade and freedom of (from) religion. And now, Knesset member Igal Yasinov, of the ultra-secularist Shinui party, intends to turn to the Supreme Court once again, seeking a ruling permitting the sale of pork in the Knesset cafeteria. The Israeli High Court of Justice this week declared the national law limiting the sale of pork products, forbidden according to Jewish tradition, to be a matter for local municipalities to regulate, or not, as they see fit. As long as whoever wants to obtain pork in a given "mixed" religious-secular municipality (as most are) can do so without too much difficulty. Judicial interference with the status quo regarding the ban on pig products was couched in terms reflecting the court's view that it was performing a balancing act. The offense assumedly felt by religious Jews when they see pig meat sold in their hometowns was juxtaposed with a citizen's presumed right to buy a pork chop. On the other hand, the inability of an Israeli to obtain a nice whale steak, or gazelle burger, anywhere in Israel was never challenged as a violation of anyone's rights by devout secularists or by free market purists. When Israel ratified the Convention on the International Trade In Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, which strictly prohibited trade in whale meat, among other endangered animals, there was no hue and cry. When animals such as the leopard, gazelle, ibex and vulture were declared protected species, there were no indignant petitions filed with the High Court of Justice. Yet, who says possible extinction is a reason to ban the sale of whale meat? Who says preserving a life form is a value greater in importance than free trade and freedom of conscience? No one even asked those questions. There is a generally widespread conviction that contributing to the extinction of a species is negative, and that conviction found expression in Israeli law. Similarly, the Jewish people - in the Jewish State - have declared, through the democratic mechanism of legislation, that the sale of pig meat also runs counter to widespread convictions. Or, to view it from the flip side: If it is deemed unacceptable to have a blanket ban on one food product because of a certain value system, then it has to be unacceptable to ban a different food product because of another value system, as well. Yet, is it conceivable that the High Court would issue a ruling allowing the sale of the meat of endangered species "only" in those towns where such sale is not offensive to the neighbors? And in the event that the neighbors are against whaling, the Court would then have to rule, as it did in the case of pork, that whale meat could only be banned from the municipality if there was a way to obtain the product a reasonable distance away. On the other hand, why only pork? Is selling shrimps any better? From the position of Jewish religious law, of course not. Shrimps - and whales, for that matter - are just as unkosher as ham. Yet that is precisely the point - the Knesset law banning pork is not a "religious" law, in the sense that it is an application of Judaic law; rather, it is a law generally reflecting the cultural values and convictions of the majority of Jews in Israel. The ban on pork - just like the ban on whale - is a cultural norm, and not an issue of "freedoms" and such abstract principles. The people, through the Knesset, expressed their will to put their cultural norms into law; hence, the court's latest decision is amputated from the people's will to preserve Jewish culture. In yet another seriously flawed decision, the High Court has shown itself removed from the Jewish consensus, by ruling in favor of Israel's inconsistent, hypocritical, anti-religious and, ultimately, anti-culture activists. 5. Right of Return Nonsense: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13819 6. The plagiarer, liar, and anti-Semite described in the following article, defending the right of Palestinians to call Jews apes and pigs, Michael Dahan, is currently employed teaching political science at Ben-Gurion University: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13842 7. Arming the enemy: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13834 8. Palestinian "Take your Daughter to Work" Day: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1087364754987 9. Israel's Intifada Victory By Charles Krauthammer The Washington Post June 18, 2004 While no one was looking, something historic happened in the Middle East. The Palestinian intifada is over, and the Palestinians have lost. For Israel, the victory is bitter. The past four years of terrorism have killed almost 1,000 Israelis and maimed thousands of others. But Israel has won strategically. The intent of the intifada was to demoralize Israel, destroy its economy, bring it to its knees, and thus force it to withdraw and surrender to Palestinian demands, just as Israel withdrew in defeat from southern Lebanon in May 2000. That did not happen. Israel's economy was certainly wounded, but it is growing again. Tourism had dwindled to almost nothing at the height of the intifada, but tourists are returning. And the Israelis were never demoralized. They kept living their lives, the young people in particular returning to cafes and discos and buses just hours after a horrific bombing. Israelis turned out to be a lot tougher and braver than the Palestinians had imagined. The end of the intifada does not mean the end of terrorism. There was terrorism before the intifada and there will be terrorism to come. What has happened, however, is an end to systematic, regular, debilitating, unstoppable terror -- terror as a reliable weapon. At the height of the intifada, there were nine suicide attacks in Israel killing 85 Israelis in just one month (March 2002). In the past three months there have been none. The overall level of violence has been reduced by more than 70 percent. How did Israel do it? By ignoring its critics and launching a two-pronged campaign of self-defense. First, Israel targeted terrorist leaders -- attacks so hypocritically denounced by Westerners who, at the same time, cheer the hunt for, and demand the head of, Osama bin Laden. The top echelon of Hamas and other terrorist groups has been either arrested, killed or driven underground. The others are now so afraid of Israeli precision and intelligence -- the last Hamas operative to be killed by missile was riding a motorcycle -- that they are forced to devote much of their time and energy to self-protection and concealment. Second, the fence. Only about a quarter of the separation fence has been built, but its effect is unmistakable. The northern part is already complete, and attacks in northern Israel have dwindled to almost nothing. This success does not just save innocent lives; it changes the strategic equation of the whole conflict. Yasser Arafat started the intifada in September 2000, just weeks after he had rejected, at Camp David, Israel's offer of withdrawal, settlement evacuation, sharing of Jerusalem and establishment of a Palestinian state. Arafat wanted all that, of course, but without having to make peace and recognize a Jewish state. Hence the terror campaign -- to force Israel to give it all up unilaterally. Arafat failed, spectacularly. The violence did not bring Israel to its knees. Instead, it created chaos, lawlessness and economic disaster in the Palestinian areas. The Palestinians know the ruin that Arafat has brought, and they are beginning to protest it. He promised them blood and victory; he delivered on the blood. Even more important, they have lost their place at the table. Israel is now defining a new equilibrium that will reign for years to come -- the separation fence is unilaterally drawing the line that separates Israelis and Palestinians. The Palestinians were offered the chance to negotiate that frontier at Camp David and chose war instead. Now they are paying the price. It stands to reason. It is the height of absurdity to launch a terrorist war against Israel, then demand the right to determine the nature and route of the barrier built to prevent that very terrorism. These new strategic realities are not just creating a new equilibrium, they are creating the first hope for peace since Arafat officially tore up the Oslo accords four years ago. Once Israel has withdrawn from Gaza and has completed the fence, terrorism as a strategic option will be effectively dead. The only way for the Palestinians to achieve statehood and dignity, and to determine the contours of their own state, will be to negotiate a final peace based on genuine coexistence with a Jewish state. It could be a year, five years or a generation until the Palestinians come to that realization. The pity is that so many, Arab and Israeli, will have had to die before then. * Find this article at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50910-2004Jun17.html 1. For those who insist I am being too cynical when I say that Sharon has a deal with the Leftist Ascendancy to free him and his son from prosecution in exchange for his implementing the political agenda of the Left, consider the following facts. Sharon was just "freed" by the Attorney General he himself appointed. But who is this Attorney General? He is not only a leftist, he is Yossi Beilin's personal poodle: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/440470.html Hannah Kim Haaretz: Mazuz "Beilin's man" . "The close ties between (Yossi) Beilin and (Attorney General Menachem) Mazuz began when Beilin was serving as justice minister between 1999 and 2001. Relations between the two were so close, that Beilin tried at the time to accelerate then attorney general Elyakim Rubinstein's elevation to the Supreme Court, in order to appoint Mazuz attorney general. "That's correct," confirms Beilin. "Unlike (Justice Minister Yosef) Tommy Lapid, for whom Meni Mazuz was only a secondary candidate for the position, for me Meni was the candidate." Beilin had help from Mazuz in, among other things, the debate on the question of torturing suspects by the Shin Bet security service. In effect, Mazuz, along with his aide Yehoshua Schoffman, was considered "Beilin's man" at the Justice Ministry. "As justice minister I had many arguments with some of the prosecutors, who evinced very conservative positions in the matter of Shin Bet torture of suspects. Meni, however, agreed with my opinion against the system of `shaking' and tortures. It is a blessing for the state that a person like him is the attorney general," says Beilin." 2. Anna Lindh was the anti-Semitic woman member of the Swedish parliament gunned down by a Swedish activist a while back. (Haaretz has taken to calling all terrorists and mass murderers "activist" these days. For example, in today's Haaretz headline, Hizbollah "activists" are reported going to Iraq to murder Americans and maybe behead them. Yes, Haaretz calls them "activists".) The "Anna Lindh" award has been awarded to the extremist anti-Israel "journalist" from Haaretz, Amira Hass, on record as favoring a single state with an Arab majority from Mediterranean to Jordan River, replacing a liquidated Israel. http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArtPE.jhtml?itemNo=441018&contrassID=2&subContrassID=21&sbSubContrassID=0 Hebrew http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/spages/440864.html English Last update - 04:37 20/06/2004 Haaretz journalist Hass awarded Anna Lindh award By Anat Balint, Haaretz Correspondent Haaretz journalist Amira Hass on Friday was awarded the Anna Lindh award, created in memory of the slain Swedish foreign minister. Hass was the first recipient of the award. The $33,000 prize will be awarded annually by the Anna Lindh Memorial Fund to an individual, organization, or project that operates in Lindh's spirit. Lindh was stabbed to death in Stockholm in September. Hass, who lives in Ramallah (but does not speak Arabic SP), was cited for her "courageous reporting" from the West Bank and Gaza, which "contributes to a better understanding of Palestinian life under Israeli occupation." To read Hass' acceptance speech denouncing Israel, see http://newiz.haifa.ac.il/pipermail/alef/2004-June/006026.html Notethat this item was posted by a groupie of Hass, Dror Feiler. This Feiler is the bloke who made a work of "art" in a Swedish museum celebrating the woman suicide bomber who murdered 23 people in a Haifa restaurant, many of them children, and including three generations of two families, and he compared her to a pure Snow White. The local Israeli Ambassador had vandalized the "art" to the horror of the pro-genocide Caring Left. 1. The Ninth of Av and the Gaza Debacle The Ninth Day of the month of Av in the Jewish religious calendar, or "Tisha B'Av", is the day of serial tragedy in Jewish history. It is the day on which the First Temple, the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, was destroyed by the Babylonians. It was the day on which the Romans decided to destroy the Second Temple. It was the date on which Betar, the last fortress to hold out against the Romans during the Bar Kochba revolt in the year 135, fell, sealing the fate of the Jewish people. The expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290 is said to have taken place on the day. In 1390 the Jews were expelled from most of France on the Ninth of Av. In 1492, King Ferdinand of Spain issued the expulsion decree, setting Tisha B'Av as the final date by which not a single Jew would be allowed to walk on Spanish soil. World War I which began the downward slide to the Holocaust began on Tisha B'av. Religious tradition has it that the Ninth Day of Av was destined to become the date for Jewish suffering and tragedies because of the sin of the "Scouts". Moses had sent out a team of scouts to explore the Promised Land, but they came back with nonsensical tales of giants and declaring that it was a horrible place, one not fit for Israelites to live, one they could never conquer. Their sin for "defaming the land", and NOT the sin of the Golden Calf (as is often mistakenly presumed), was the reason why the entire generation of those liberated from Pharaoh were condemned to die in the desert, while only their children would be allowed to enter the Promised Land. Jewish tradition has it that all episodes of Jewish suffering and tragedy originate in the demonstration of indifference, insolence, and mockery for the right and the claim by Jews to their own homeland! Ariel Sharon has struck his deal with the Israeli Leftist Ascendancy. In exchange for his implementing the Mitzna Plan for Gaza, the same plan Israeli voters rejected by a landslide, both in the last general election and also in the Likud party referendum, Sharon and his family will not be charged for election finance improprieties and for accepting payoffs. Under the Sharon version of the Mitzna plan, the Gaza Strip will be ethnically cleansed of Jews, as a reward for Palestinian barbarism. The "settlers" will be marched out at bayonet point, and the level of terror and violence coming out of the Gaza Strip will increase by several magnitudes, no doubt to the astonishment of the Likud leadership. Under the Sharon version of the Mitzna Plan, there is a timetable for all Jews to be expelled from Gaza. The date from which no Jews will be permitted to enter the Gaza Strip for any reason has been set at August 14, 2005. August 14, 2005 is the Ninth Day of Av. 2. Was the Liberation of France from Germany a Mistake? Former French PM: Creation of Israel by Balfour Declaration a Historic Mistake Former French PM: Creation of Israel by Balfour Declaration a Historic Mistake www.ipc.gov.ps/ipc_e/ipc_e-1/e_News/news2004/2004_06/112.html [IMRA: EUOBSERVER reported on 17 June that Rocard is in the running to serve as president of the European Parliament for two and a half years in a deal between the socialist group (PES) and the European People Party's (EPP) www.euobserver.com/?sid=9&aid=16660 ] GAZA, June 19, 2004 (IPC + Asharq Al-Awsat)-- [Official wesbite of the PA] The former French Prime Minister and current member of the European Parliament, Michel Rocard, blasted Israel as an "abnormal case in the world", describing its creation by the 1917-Balfour Declaration as a "historic mistake". Rocard, who is also a well-known member of the French Socialist Party, was delivering a lecture at the Bibliotheca Alexandrina on June 16, in which he said that the Balfour promise England gave to the Jews to create a national homeland for them in Palestine was a "mistake". He also described the Israeli state as a "unique and abnormal condition because it was created with a promise, and that millions of Jews gathered from all around the world, creating an entity that continues to pose a threat to its neighbors until today." Rocard also drew attention to the fact that Israel was also historically created on a racist basis, depending on armed conflict to set its borders. Rocard referred to the colonization of the Arab world, of which his country was involved in, as the main reason behind the current state of violence and conflict in the Middle East. However, Rocard warned that delaying a peace agreement between the Arab states and Israel would "greatly increase violence in the region," pointing out that the long-demanded reforms in the Arab states stemmed from the inside, not imposed by outside forces. "Peace must spring from a religious base . all reforms can be made possible through the teachings of our divine religions. To pray to God is accepted, but violence is not," concluded Rocard. 3. Kerry - Second to Many: http://jewishpress.com/news_article.asp?article=3837 4. Mazal Tov to the JWR: http://jewishpress.com/news_article.asp?article=3823 5. Sisengagement Disenguity: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=8006 6. Dual First Amendement: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=7993 7. Does this man we can silence the Reform's "Religious" Action Center? http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell.html 8. Terror Chic in California: http://chronwatch.com/link.asp?id=7997 9. The Un-Esther: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/jg20040618.shtml 1. Just when you think Shimon Peres could not possibly come up with anything stupider than his "ideas" about peace, here comes today's banner headline: Peres blasts Netanyahu's `greedy capitalism' Now actually that is not what he said. That is the way Haaretz cleaned it up. What Shimon Peres really said is that Netanyahu is trying to create "Piggy Capitalism" in Israel. Really. You see, Netanyahu sometimes talks about competitive markets, busting state-protected or state-erected monopolies, and the need for a market economy. But Peres is an economic Luddite and one of those great believers in the failed 18th century notions regarding "socialism". In other words, Peres, and the rest of the Israeli Left, are at least as dangerous and stupid when they speak about social and economic issues as when they state their "ideas" about "peace". Now you may recall how one of the Laborite lefties a few back referred to non-Leftists as "rabble", and afterwards bumper stickers appeared decalaring "I am Proud Rabble"? Well, I am a proud piggy capitalist. Peres and his friends would like to restore the rigid socialist planning that produced Third World deprivation in Israel in the 1950s, shortages, and black markets, and kept Israel underdeveloped until the middle 1980s and afterward, when the high tech revolution broke the socialist control by the politicians over much of the economy. Peres' role models are still the One-Meal-a-Day socialist paradises of Cuba and North Korea. Meanwhile - I would like to start a new campaign whose slogan is "Better to Eat Meals under Piggy Capitalism than to starve under Peacie Socialism." Peacie Socialism of course is the surefire recipe for the destruction of Israel and for a Second Holocaust. And to celebrate my new campaign, here is our marching song. It is to the tune of "Piggies" by the Beatles, with a few minor adjustments: The Little Peacies Have you seen the little peacies Crawling in the dirt? And for all the little peacies, Life is getting worse; Cause all the little Jews, Have food to eat of Have you seen the bigger peacies In their yuppie dives? You will find the bigger peacies STill preaching socialist lies So all us little Jews Won't have food to eat of In their styes with Euro backing, They don't care About the terror all around. In their eyes there's something lacking. What they need's a damn good whacking. Everywhere there's lots of peacies Living yuppie lives. You can see them out for dinner With their piggy wives. Clutching forks and knives to Fry our bacon. 2. ISM Terrorist Lived with Suicide Bomber!! San Francisco Examiner [SEE LAST PARAGRAPH] Israel deports S.F. activist Woman engaged in 'liberation struggle.' By J.K. Dineen | Staff Writer Published on Friday, June 18, 2004 URL: http://www.examiner.com/article/index.cfm/i/061804n_israel A Mission District political activist who had traveled to Israel to enroll in a Bethlehem-based Arabic school was deported from Israel after the government there learned of her involvement in several pro- Palestinian organizations. On Thursday, after several days of trying to appeal her deportation, Brooke Atherton, 26, was put on an Alitalia flight from the Israeli Ben-Gurion Airport. A native of Austin, Texas and a graduate of Stanford University, Atherton made no apologies about her sympathy for what she called "the Palestinian liberation struggle." Atherton was active in the International Solidarity Movement, a pro- Palestinian activist group, several members of which have been killed in the West Bank and Gaza Strip while acting as "human shields" in trying to protect Palestinians from Israeli troops. Omer Caspi, a deputy consul for Israel's San Francisco consulate, said he did not know the facts of the case. "We're not going to prevent someone from entering [Israel] based on membership with [those] groups," said consulate spokesman Jered Bernstein. In 2002, Atherton had lived for several months with a Palestinian family, the son of which became a suicide bomber after his best friend was killed by Israeli snipers. The Israeli government ultimately bulldozed the home she had stayed in, Peter Atherton said. 3. The Feminazis and the Marxist Radio Station: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13825 4. Dangerous Peaceniks: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13845 5. Disingenuous Disengagement: http://www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/04-issue/barder-4.htm Thursday, June 17, 2004
1 Among the manifestations of Israel's dual justice system (one for the Left and one for the not) is the fact that there is one separate set of rules governing free speech for leftists and another for everyone else. It is Israel's version of the First Amendment. Leftists may openly endorse violence, anti-Semitism, and anti-Jewish terror. They may call for Israel to be liquidated. They may denounce Israel in anti-Semitic journals all over the globe as a nazi terrorist country. They may call for wholesale violation of the law and may break the law itself. Arab politicians may do all those things also. That is all protected speech. But any statement of even lightly questionable taste or dubious sensitivity by non-leftists is a felony, illegal under Israel's selective laws against "racism" and "incitement". Which brings us to football hooliganism. Israel has its share of soccer (football) hooliganism, although it is considerably less ugly than that of the British and some other Eurohoods. Israeli football yahoos do not use violence, they only shout irritating cusses. Some of the worst cussing is at matches between Arab and Jewish soccer teams. There a quite a few top-rank Arab teams and one (from Sakhnin) just won the Israeli national championship. Anyways, at Arab-Jewish playoffs, those cheering on the Arab teams often scream anti-Semitic cheers, like "Death to the Jews", or "Long Live bin Laden", and occasionally wave PLO or Hamas flags. The Jewish rowdies yell things back, including "Death to the Arabs". They all no doubt think this is harmless and playful. I personally would take all football hooligans of all races and creeds and turn firehoses on them, and then sentence them to 100 hours of nonstop listening to sociology lectures. Anyway, tasteless the chanting at soccer games is, without a doubt. But criminal? Well, it IS criminal, but only for the Jewish rowdies, not for the Arabs. Jerusalem Magistrate Haim Liran yesterday convicted a Jewish yahoo, one Yosef Cohen age 33 going on 12, for yelling "Death to Arabs" at a soccer game, this as a violation of Israel's law against "racism". Sentencing not yet announced. No Arabs have been indicted. No Arabs have ever been indicted in Israel for anti-Semitism under Israel's "anti-racism" law, ever. For anything. When else are Israel's dual justices upset by "racism"? Well, the prosecution can barely restrain itself over the arch-criminal and terrorist David Ha-Ivri. What was Ha-Ivri's dastardly crime? Ha-Irvi printed up and sold Tee shirts on which it was printed "Where there are no Arabs, there is no terrorism." Really. Now one can argue whether such a statement really constitutes "racism" at all or merely a testable empirical assertion. The prosecutors claim it implies Arabs should be expelled from Israel or PLO-occupied Jewish lands, but that looks to me a whole lot like prosecutorial deconstructionism. Whether or not the Tee shirt showed good or poor taste is in the eye of the beholder. Meanwhile poor David Ha-Ivri is under indictment and waiting to see whether he will be sentenced to hard labor on a chain gang in the bayou for his dastardly deed. More on the Tee Shirt Prosecution at http://www.foundation1.org/papers-articles/democracy/haivri-freedom-speech.htm and http://www.israelnn.com/article.php3?id=3349 Stay tuned. 2. And he never even went to Iraq: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040615/ap_on_re_us/hollywood_homicides_3 3. ACLU's Jihad against the Poor: http://www.naples-daily-news.com/npdn/pe_columnists/article/0%2C2071%2CNPDN_14960_2957144%2C00.html 4. Country Joe (60s rock druggie) having second thoughts about the Left: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13778 5. Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. (George Orwell, Partisan Review, 1942) 6. Spook Spat: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=3812 7. Ben Shapiro on why Jews should vote GOP: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20040616.shtml 8. Meanwhile, in the university of DUH: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38977 9. The Marxist-Islamofascist Alliance: http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/5163 10. Nice pieces on Reagan: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1087368072291&p=1006953079865 and also http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1087368072294&p=1006953079865 Wednesday, June 16, 2004
Haaretz, the main Palestinian newspaper published in Hebrew, all this week has been promoting it phony media hot air balloon about how supposedly intelligence officers manipulated Sharon and his people into thinking that Arafat and his stormtroopers were not interested in peace. According to the New Journalism prevalent at Haaretz these days, 1400 murdered Israelis are not a sign of anything, anti-Semitic nazi propaganda roadcast daily by the PLO does not tell you anything. Haaretz insists, galaxies of evidence notwithstanding, that Arafat is still as devoted to peace as Peres and Rabin convinced themselves he was back in 1993, and the only reason things have gone haywire is that a senior intelligence officer dared to state the truth. And how does Haaretz know? Because two other senior intelligence officers from the Left gave interviews to al-Ard, er I mean to Haaretz, and they said so. Today the Haaretz Spin Doctors for Palestinian Liberation have a follow up "scoop". They interview yet another Lefty, this time one Mati Steinberg. Steinberg is a purported "expert" on Palestinians, at least that is what Haaretz columnist Danny Rubenstein thinks. Rubenstein also considers himself an expert on Palestinians. I do not know anyone else who agrees. Steinberg might once have served as consultant for the intelligence service head during the mind-numbingly stupid administration of Haj Amin Ehud Barak, the gent who once said that if he had been born a Palestinian he would have become a terrorist. The fact that Steinberg could have been such a consultant may go far in explaining the singular inability of the intelligence services to tell summer from winter and day from night in those days (and these today). The fact of the matter is that the intelligence services found out about the PLO what every Israeli barber and gardener knew, only years after the former knew. Haaretz scratches up Steinberg as someone giving artillery support to the Haaretz fable that "inaccurate" intelligence assessments by officers dissenting from the holy canon of Far Leftist evaluation of Arafat were the ones responsible for the inability to strike a deal with Arafat. The whole interview is at http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/439571.html He is also a source for the previous pseudo-scoop at Haaretz (http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=437895&contrassID=1 ) If Steinberg is such an expert, how come a web search did not turn up a single reference to anything he ever published about anything? The "Palestinian Refugees" ALREADY Got their "Right of Return" By Steven Plaut Try to imagine what the world would be like if Israel had granted the "Palestinian refugees" who fled from Israel in 1948-49 the right to return to Israel. Not to the West Bank. Not to the Gaza Strip. But to Israel within its pre-1967 borders. Imagine a situation in which Israel agreed to allow tens of thousands of Arabs who fled from the battle zones of the Israeli War of Independence the possibility of returning to Israel, in many cases to the very homes they had abandoned during the fighting. Imagine how the same world, currently obsessed upon achieving a "right of return" for "Palestinian refugees" were forced to acknowledge that Israel had already granted the possibility for tens of thousands of these refugees to return to Israel, in many cases decades ago. What would the world then have left to bash Israel about? What would the anti-Semites have left to scream about, or the crowd claiming to be "anti-Zionists but not anti-Semites", who only enjoy seeing "Zionist" children mass murdered, or the self-hating leftist Jewish anti-Semites? Well, hold on to your streimel. Cause I have a whopper of a revelation to make to you. Israel DID grant the "Palestinian refugees" the right to return to Israel! Let us back up a bit. In 1947-48, the UN proposed partitioning "Palestine" into a Jewish and an Arab state of approximately equal sizes. The Jews accepted the plan, and the Arabs rejected it. When the British Mandate over "Palestine" was ended under the UN decision, the Arab states attacked the newborn state of Israel, tried to annihilate it and its population, and at the same time gobbled up most of the territory that the UN had allotted to become a Palestinian Arab state. The territory that became Israel had NEVER been a Palestinian Arab state, ever. Most of the Arabs in "Palestine" had migrated in from neighboring Arab countries after the 19th century start of the Zionist Jewish immigration, taking advantage of the influx of capital, the availability of jobs and of services, like hospitals. In other words, the Arabs of "Palestine" in 1948, exactly like the Jews, were by and large people from families who had been in the country for three generations or less. During the fighting in the 1948-49 war, thousands of Arabs living in the territory that became Israel fled. The main reason they fled was that they understandably wanted to put some distance between their families and the battle zones. At the same time, they were ordered by the Arab political leadership to leave the territory of Israel. Why take my word on this? Listen to Arab sources: "The Arab States encouraged the Palestine Arabs to leave their homes temporarily in order to be out of the way of the Arab invasion armies." - Falastin (Jordanian newspaper), February 19, 1949 "The Arab governments told us: Get out so that we can get in. So we got out, but they did not get in." - from the Jordan daily Ad Difaa, September 6, 1954 ""The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, THEY ABANDONED THEM, FORCED THEM TO EMIGRATE AND TO LEAVE THEIR HOMELAND" (emphasis added), Abu Mazen, erstwhile "Prime Minister" of the Palestinian Authority, in "What We Have Learned and What We Should Do", published in Falastin el Thawra, the official journal of the PLO, of Beirut, in March 1976. (there are scores of other Arab sources confirming this) So how many Arabs fled? The number has become enormously distorted over time by the Bash-Israel lobby and by Arab propagandists and their apologists, who usually claim between 500,000 and a million. A more realistic estimate is between 300,000 and 450,000, based in part on Arab and UNRWA sources themselves (http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~samuel/refugees.html ). Most of these refugees ended up in some of the twenty-two sovereign Arab states, including those Arab countries from which they had migrated into "Palestine" in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the first place. In other words, the "refugees" went back to their earlier homelands in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. It was a sort of "right of return." At the same time, the Arab states carried out a near-total ethnic cleansing of around a million Jews, who had been living there since Biblical days and in many cases before these states had Arab populations (http://www.ajds.org.au/mendes_refugees.htm ). The Je ws from Arab countries left behind far more property than did the Palestinian Arab refugees (http://jewishrefugees.org/JusticeForJews.htm ). Most of these Jewish refugees were resettled in Israel In the years immediately after World War II, there were more than 50 million refugees: Poles, Germans, Indians, Pakistanis, Hungarians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. etc. They were all long ago resettled and forgotten, all except for the "Palestinian refugees". How come? Because for decades, the Arab aggressor states found it convenient to utilize the "refugees" as a political and military weapon against Israel, not only of propaganda and spin, but of terrorism (http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~peters/resettlement.html ). "Palestinians" inside Arab states were trained as terrorists and sent out to murder. At the same time, there was enormous incentive for the Arab locals in the countries into which the refugees had entered to pretend also to be "Palestinian refugees" (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=8650 ). After all, the UN and other agencies were handing out free food and perqs to anyone pretending to be a refugee from "Palestine". (For further information and documentation, see http://arabterrorism.tripod.com/FAQ/refugees.html ) Unlike all those many millions of other people considered refugees in the late 1940s, the "Palestinians" were the only ones for whom the "right of return" to their previous homes was considered an entitlement. The reason was not a selective affection for Palestinians, but a selective hostility towards Israel and Jews. Those demanding the wholesale "return" to Israel of Palestinian "refugees", including the countless thousands of non-Palestinians pretending to be Palestinian refugees, had one goal in mind, the eradication of Israel. Israel would have been insane to allow itself to be inundated with real and make-pretend Palestinian "refugees", this in a tiny sliver of land the size of Maryland, at the same time that the 22 Arab states have territory-galore stretching from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to Central Asia! The Palestinian Arabs and their sponsors had tried to annihilate Israel and failed. Just like the infant United States, which refused to allow any of the tens of thousands of Tory Loyalists expelled by the patriots to "return" to the United States after the War of Independence, Israel was entirely in its rights to refuse to allow the "return" of masses of "Palestinians", whose migration was being demanded by those seeking to liquidate Israel via a demographic flooding. There is just one little caveat though. Israel DID let the Palestinian refugees return!! Tens of thousands of them were quietly allowed to return to Israel, in many cases to their original homes, once the fighting in 1949 subsided. Many continue to be admitted today within the framework of "family reunification" agreements. From 1948 until 2001, Israel allowed about 184,000 "Palestinian refugees" or their families to "return" to Israel proper (Jerusalem Post, January 2, 2001; see also Ha'aretz 28 December 2000). These are in addition to about 57,000 Palestinians from Jordan illegally in Israel, towards whom the authorities are turning a blind eye (Ha'aretz, 4 April 2001 ). Not the West Bank, not Gaza, but Israel inside its pre-1967 "Green Line" borders! In the Camp David II meetings in 2000, Israeli leftist Prime Minister Ehud Barak rather insanely offered to allow another 150,000 "refugees" to enter Israel as part of a peace accord. The PLO's response was to launch pogroms and four years of atrocities, because the number was finite. (See also http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/immigration-oslo.html ) The demand for a "right of return" by Palestinians to Israel is no doubt the most absurd political demand floating anywhere around the planet. There is already an Arab state in two thirds of Mandatory Palestine, named Jordan, and most of its population is Palestinian Arab. The Oslo Accords and Israel's Camp David II offer would have created a second Arab state in Palestine, in the West Bank and Gaza, as part of a comprehensive peace settlement. Any "Palestinian" from anywhere could have moved to "Palestine" or to Jordan, within the framework of such a peace, the same way any Jew who wishes to may immigrate to Israel, or any Armenian may immigrate to Armenia, and Greeks from the Greek Diaspora are automatically welcomed in Greece. The PLO and the Islamofascist states backing it demand that in ADDITION to establishing a second Arab state in Palestine within the framework of any peace settlement, Israel itself must ALSO be converted into a third Arab Palestinian state, via unlimited massive immigration of people claiming to be Palestinians. Benjamin Franklin, who opposed granting even a dime in compensation to the Tory refugees expelled from the United States during the War of Independence, would be splitting his sides laughing. But the most Orwellistic absurdity of all is that Israel long ago DID grant the right to "return" to Israel itself to tens of thousands of "Palestinian refugees". Did this earn Israel the world's gratitude for its uniquely generous gesture? Did the world denounce the Arab fascist states who ignored this generosity and continued to seek Israel's destruction militarily and the genocide of its population? Do today's bleeding hearts and recreational compassion posturers, pretending to feel uncontrollable pain and caring for Palestinian refugees, even know about the limited "right of return" granted by Israel over the past decades? Hindus have never been returned to Pakistan, Moslems from Pakistan have not been returned to India, ethnic Germans were not returned to their pre-war homes in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Russia or Romania, Japanese have not been returned to Manchuria, Greeks have not been returned to Anatolia, Jews have not been compensated for the billions they left behind when ethnic cleansing of Jews in Moslem countries took place, and Tory Loyalists were never returned to New England. But tens of thousands of "Palestinian refugees" were granted by Israel what none of these others received. It is time to say enough is enough. The only remaining reasonable plan regarding those still claiming to be "Palestinian refugees" is simply - Foggedaboutit. Tuesday, June 15, 2004
1. Israel has a long tradition of having a dual judicial system. There is one system that is a set of rules for courts, police and prosecution and that operates for leftists, and another for everyone else. That, for example, is the reason why Bibi Netanyahu and his wife were investigated aggressively and persecuted on suspicion of taking some ashtrays and trinkets from the Prime Minister's residence in Jerusalem when Netanyahu had to crate things away in a hurry after losing the election. The sleaze of Ehud Barak's campaign finance would be an embarrassment even in a Third World country, but the prosecutors just never got around to investigating any of that. And then there is the deafening silence by the prosecution regarding the even worse set of slime that characterized Amram Mitzna's ties with his building contractor friends. When it comes to Mitzna sleaze, not a creature has ever been moving in the prosecutorial house, not even a mouse. But, as I said, the reason is very simple. It's the dual justice system, again. That is why a Jewish fellow who made a T-shirt with a slogan the Left thought was insensitive got prosecuted, but the worst Leftists, openly endorsing destruction of Israel and supporting terrorist atrocities, or Arab nationalists making little effort to hide their support for genocide, just never seem to get investigated or prosecuted. Actually they get tenured and promoted. Free speech absolutism holds for leftist incitement and anti-Semitism, but denunciation of the Left is a form of libel. Now all of this is well known, but the sudden decision by the Attorney General NOT to prosecute Ariel Sharon for his own election finance sleaze just does not seem to fit into the pattern of the dual justice system. It comes just hours after the same dual system passed a court ruling that Israelis must not vote in favor of local municipal laws outlawing sale of pork. The same court never ruled that it is a free constitutional right to import KOSHER food! Do not imagine the decision NOT to prosecute Sharon has anything to do with the fact that the current Attorney General is himself a Sharon appointment. That would show your unfamiliarity with Israeli politics. In Israel the Likud always appoints leftists to public positions and spends its time in office doing its best to help the Labor Party get elected. The current Attorney General is a leftist. No exception. SO how come the dual justice apparatchiks and nomenklatura are not prosecuting Sharon and his kin? Was it because Sharon's sleaze was nickel and dime stuff compared with the filth of the Barak and Mitzna campaigns? Is it because the Attorney General thinks Sharon's penny ante improprieties can wait till he finishes his term of office before being investigated? No, grasshopper. The explanation is quite simple. The Left made Sharon an offer he could not refuse. Sharon will implement the Left's political agenda, including implementing the Mitzna Plan for the Gaza Strip, the same plan rejected in a landslide by the Israeli voter. And in exchange the Left will lay off Sharon and his family, the Left's pocket Attorney General will dismiss the charges, the Left's Supreme Court justices will sit by the sidelines in uncharacteristic humility, and the Labor Party and maybe Meretz will back Sharon in the parliament when the handful of men and women of principle and conscience in the Likud and in its coalition partners abandon Sharon and vote against his appeasing the PLO, er I meant the Israeli Left. 2. Politicalized Campus Hiring and Firing: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13765 3. Mikey Lerner's Comrades come out of their holes: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13750 4. Four Cheers for Ben Shapiro: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13764 5. Apologizing to the Arab World: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13767 6. Wall St Journal: http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004022 The End of 'Arafat' Even if he lives, the idea of him must die. Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT Reflecting the views of Israel's Cabinet, Vice Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said publicly over the weekend that "killing" Yasser Arafat was "one of the options." Secretary of State Colin Powell of course had to say that exiling or executing Arafat would incite Arab rage, that it would be most unhelpful to the peace process, etc., etc. The truth is that Yasser Arafat's moment in history has ended. The world would do well to think hard about how it came to pass, after so many years and so much talk and blood, that the era of Arafat arrived at this endpoint--with Israel saying that it may be worth the trouble simply to kill him. How far we've come from the Rose Garden in 1993. It is a fine irony that Mr. Powell spoke of the need to soldier on with Yasser Arafat while the Secretary himself was standing in Baghdad for the first time. Mr. Powell is in Baghdad because President Bush concluded after September 11, and after the political failure of the first Gulf War, that the years of Western self-delusion about the nature of global terror must be brought to an end. Similarly, the delusions about Arafat also must now end. "Arafat" should enter history not merely as the name of one autocratic man, but as the name we assign to an entire Western phenomenon of false thinking. "Arafat," we now see, has come to represent the act of self-delusion on a massive, international scale. "Arafat" is about refusing to believe that an adversary is simply irredeemable. Most importantly at this particular moment, "Arafat" is about allowing barbarism, or its techniques, to challenge the political tenets of civilized life. For years the Western nations that emerged from World War II and the Cold War have been playing with fire by pretending that their world and the alternative world of "Arafat" could somehow coexist. More than anything, this impossible notion reflected political and moral fatigue. Thus in the 1990s, the world came very close to letting "Arafat," this time in the person of Slobodan Milosevic, achieve its logical end on European soil, again. But the United States intervened and Milosevic is on trial for crimes against civilized humanity. George W. Bush's decision to go to war against the regime of Saddam Hussein was the opposite of "Arafat" thinking; it was a decision to refute "Arafat." If you look at the Nobel Prizes' own biography of Yasser Arafat, you find this remarkable sentence toward the end: "Like other Arab regimes in the area, however, Arafat's governing style tended to be more dictatorial than democratic." That is to say, Arafat by his own choice of governance--dictatorship over democracy--bears individual responsibility for the legacy he leaves. That legacy includes: the contemporary crime of hijacking and blowing up civilian-filled airliners; the attempted destabilization of Jordan and Israel and the successful destruction of Lebanon as a formerly sovereign nation; and decades of violated international agreements, culminating in the collapse of Oslo. Last year, in a perfect storm of bad faith, Arafat was caught paying for the shipment of arms from Iran to the Palestinian territories aboard the Karine A. Across these years, the West, mainly the European nations, accomplished the post-World War II feat of pretending that crime is not crime, so long as the motives and politics for the crimes are moralized. The U.S. and Israel participated as well in the pretense, bringing Arafat out of exile in Tunis. The world has learned since that this apologetics (and much direct funding) has made possible any crime, culminating in the anti-moral act known as suicide bombers. Arafat most recently threw over Mahmoud Abbas, and the fatigued West barely sighed in complaint. This past September 3, in an article published in the Palestinian daily newspaper Al-Ayyam, the Palestinian writer Tawfiq Abu Bakr wrote: "It is difficult to find a greater and more deeply rooted culture of self-deception than that in our Arab and Palestinian arena." But we in the West fomented that culture of self-deception, by perpetuating the conceit that Yasser Arafat--"Arafat"--was the singular vessel of peace for the Palestinians. He manifestly is not. The Israelis are in the best position to know what to do at this point, though no option--seclusion, exile, trial or killing him--is particularly attractive. But Israel has to live (or die) with Arafat. The U.S. for its part, rather than sustain the Arafat conceit as it is doing now, should say it is no longer going to be associated with Arafat and what he stands for. As for the Palestinians and Arabs, the President of the United States has said many times that he supports a Palestinian state. Now they too have to decide whether the moment has arrived to get past "Arafat." For those who will scream that this is more "unilateralism," we would say that for some 30 years there were crucial breakpoints, most recently the Oslo concessions and the Abbas opening, where credible pressure on Arafat from important players in the West and Middle East might have avoided arriving at where we are now. It never came. Not once. Where Yasser Arafat spends the rest of his life is not important. What matters is for the world to recognize that it is time to get rid of "Arafat." 7. The Panty Jihad: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13779 8. Nice reference Tool: http://arabterrorism.tripod.com/FAQ/refugees.html
|