|
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Posted
6/25/2005 10:37:00 PM
"The Nation" Seeks to Deny Dershowitz Free Speech For clean copy and links, go to http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=601
It is always a matter of great amusement to see Far-Leftist moonbats, those who support all the anti-American dictatorships on the planet, whine about the "suppression of free speech" whenever a non-leftist criticizes them. And it is particularly amusing to see the "The Nation" whine when Alan Dershowitz dares to utilize his own freedom of speech. Jon Wiener, writing in this week.s issue of "The Nation", can.t control his bladder due to his outrage over the fact that Dersh wrote to the Governor of California, yep - to the Ahnold Himself, to suggest that the state-owned and state-financed publication house of the University of California NOT publish a book by Norman Finkelstein. Finkelstein is an anti-Semitic crackpot who has been described by the Anti-Defamation League as a Holocaust Denier. Employed by DePaul University as an assistant professor in political science, Finkelstein regards Holocaust Denier and neonazi David Irving to be a great historian. Yes, that is the same DePaul University that fired Professor Thomas Klocek for daring to defend Israel in front of some campus jihadniks. Finkelstein, when he is not bashing and libeling author/philosopher Elie Wiesel and other people for daring to be survivors of the same Holocaust that his mentor David Irving claims never took place, saves special spleen for attacking Dershowitz for daring to support Israel. Finkelstein wants Israel to be destroyed so that the world can have a second Holocaust of the Jews that Finkelstein can claim never took place. The distinguished historian Omer Bartov from Brown University compared Finkelstein.s scribblings to the the old czarist forgery "Protocols of the Elders of Zion". Our guess is that "The Nation" interpreted that as a compliment for Finkelstein. The Ahnold.s people turned Dersh down. Now while we suppose that even crackpots like Finkelstein are entitled to the protections of free speech, we see no reason why the innocent taxpayers of California should be raped into paying for the proliferation of Finkelstein.s filth. Finkelstein can get all the "free speech" he wants on the pages of "The Nation" and "Counterpunch," as well as the many neonazi web sites who adore him. Dershowitz has invested considerable energy in exposing Finkelstein as a neonazi buffoon. The main reason for Dershowitz.s letter to the Governor seems to be that Finkelstein libels him in the "book" in question. Finkelstein has been claiming that Dershowitz plagiarized some material from another writer, Joan Peters.s From Time Immemorial. He did not. Wiener writes in .The Nation.: "The body of Beyond Chutzpah shows Finkelstein to be an indefatigable researcher with a forensic ability to take apart other people.s arguments. The core of the book challenges Dershowitz.s defense of Israel.s human rights record by citing the findings of mainstream groups, including Amnesty International, the Israeli human rights organization B.Tselem and Human Rights Watch." In other words, Finkelstein quotes from other discredited Bash-Israel propagandists to prove his "case" against Israel and against Dershowitz. Why not quote from Ward Churchill and Noam Chomsky to prove that America is the aggressor against Islamic terrorists? The main claim of Wiener and Finkelstein against Israel? "Since then Israel has killed three Palestinians for every Israeli killed." Of course, since the Americans killed far more Germans and Japanese in World War II than the numbers of Americans killed by those two countries, then the dimwitted duo no doubt regard the Americans as the real oppressors and criminals in THAT war! "The Nation" had earlier run a sycophatic piece praising Finkelstein.s scribblings and comparing Finkelstein ethically to the Prophets of the Bible, written by an anti-Semitic lecturer from Ben Gurion University in Israel named Neve Gordon. It is all well and good that "The Nation" wishes to defend the free speech of Holocaust Deniers and promote their point of view in the magazine, but why are they not willing to extend that same right of free speech to Dershowitz and allow him to express his opinion to the Governor of California? http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=601 2. Trent University.s Self-Hating Moonbat http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=596 We figured it was only natural for the Cockburn team to have recruited Michael Neumann as a Counterpunch Cockroach. Neumann is one of the worst bashers of Israel in Canadian "academics" and he is a devoted member of the Cockburn Cult, which believes that just because some people think that all Jews should be murdered is no reason to label them anti-Semites. Neumann dutifully turns out pro-anti-Semitism pieces that have appeared in Counterpunch. Like the Cockburns, he regards Americans and Israelis as barbarians. His most memorable comment was: "I think we should almost never take antisemitism seriously, and maybe we should have some fun with it." This was followed by: "Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn.t, but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all?" Ernst Zundel seems to have an academic follower north of the border! The Canadian Jewish Congress wrote a letter of complaint to Neumann.s employer, Trent University, about his naked anti-Semitism. As the matter attracted greater attention, Neumann repudiated the statement (without denying its authenticity), then apologized to the CJC. Neumann proudly proclaims himself a follower of the Swedish nazi who sometimes calls himself "Israel Shamir". Neumann is a Jew-hating professor of Jewish extraction, just what the Cockburns love. He teaches "philosophy" at Trent University in Canada. He is also a close associate of "Rabbi" Moonbat, Mikey Lerner, the editor of Tikkun magazine. We keep expecting the Tikkun people to discovery one of these days that socialism does not work and so to change the name of their trashy little magazine to "Tycoon" instead. Anyways, Neumann.s new contribution to the Moonbatmosphere is a piece this weekend in Counterpunch in which he bemoans the failues of the Left. We thought his most laughable line was this: "Since the 1960s, most of the silliness and snobbishness of the left has vanished: nowadays leftists tend to avoid jargon and don.t carry on like a Che Guevara Mini-Me." We suspect he is talking about a Left in some parallel galaxy. He does accidentally get a couple of things right: "Given its current message, the left has no plausible way to address these patriots: in fact the left.s message gives them reason to support the war effort." We agree entirely. Last year Jonathan Kay from Canada.s National Post did a superb job of "outing" the jihadnik from Trent. Here are a few citations: Since the Al-Aqsa intifada broke out in 2000, hard-left academics and activists have sometimes blurred the distinction between hatred of Israeli policies and hatred of Jews. To excuse suicide bombings as a legitimate option of the "oppressed" (so long as the victims are Jewish), to recycle the lies of Jenin and other modern-day blood libels, to demonize Israel as "genocidal" while ignoring the far worse calamities in Chechnya, Sudan, Algeria and elsewhere . all these tactics reflect a mindset that many Jews find indistinguishable from plain bigotry. Exhibit A here in Canada is Michael Neumann, a philosophy professor at Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario. Since last year, the educator has been posting his essays on the left-wing Web site Counterpunch.org. The articles vary in subject: terrorism, U.S. foreign policy, the Middle East, etc. But they are all soaked in a single, dominant motif: a shrill, virtually pathological hatred for the state of Israel. Israel, the Trent educator says, is "a growing evil" whose campaign against the neighboring Arabs is "vengeful, relentless [and] sadistically gradual." The country.s "crimes," he writes, reflect "a cold-blooded, calculated, indeed an eagerly embraced choice of war over peace, and an elaborate plan to seek out those who had fled the misery of previous confrontations, to make certain that their suffering would continue." Naturally, comparisons to the Nazis and their eugenics agenda abound. Israeli settlers want peace "just as Hitler wanted peace," Mr. Neumann says. The Jews see the Palestinians as "lice," and are seeking their "extinction." The army, meanwhile, serves "the higher purpose of clearing away the vermin who resist the implantation of superior Jewish DNA throughout the occupied territories." Are Prof. Neumann.s views anti-Semitic? The answer to this question does not appear to trouble him much. His theory is that Jews bear a collective responsibility to speak out against Israel. And if they fail to acquit themselves of that duty, then they have fairly earned the world.s hatred. As usual, he sees a comparison with the Nazis as apt: "If it is not racist, and reasonable, to say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews." http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=596
Friday, June 24, 2005
Posted
6/24/2005 12:24:00 PM
Brits to Stage "Rachel Corrie Cantata" http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=594
What is it with those British Moonbats and Rachel Corrie? No sooner do they stage a "play", which glorifies Corrie while ignoring the hundreds of civilian victims of the terrorists that Corrie supported and helped, than they also decide to warble the Rachel Corrie "cantata". Rachel Corrie, you will recall, was the a clueless student at Evergreen College in Washington State who decided to commit suicide on behalf of Palestinian terrorism. She joined the pro-terror "International Solidarity Movement", and - in beween burning American flags - went to the Gaza Strip to try to interfere with Israeli forces destroying terrorist infrastructure, and in particular to protect the smuggling tunnels into Gaza from Egypt. It is through such tunnels that the Palestinian terrorists import their explosives and missiles. Because the tunnels are purposely built below residences to hide them, the only way to destroy them is to demolish the houses that hide them and then blow up the tunnels. The Corrie parents are these days touring the US in a Bash Israel tour, together with the "innocent" Palestinian owners of the house the bulldozer was removing to get to the tunnels when Corrie jumped in its path. An Israeli earth mover was attacking terror tunnels the morning Corrie decided to challenge it to a game of chicken. Placing herself in a position where the driver could not see her, the bulldozer crushed her. She died later in a PLO-run medical facility and there is some reason to suspect she actually died due to incompetent medical care there. (Her ISM colleague Tom Hurndall, hit by a bullet when he tried to protect terrorists in a firefight, similarly died from medical malpractice when he was undergoing care back in a British hospital that is a part of the socialized medical system in Britain. The second movement of the "cantata" is dedicated to Tom Hurndall, but not to the British MDs who killed him. Corrie, like all the ISM hoodlums and useful idiots of the Islamofascist terrorists, was in Israel to engage in violence, to assist terrorists, and to serve as a human shield for Palestinian murderers. The ISM openly endorses Palestinian terrorism against Jewish civilians, which the ISM calls "armed struggle". Sycophantic ravings about Corrie are increasingly passing for "art and culture" among the fundamentalist Left. A while back one Philip Munger from the University of Alaska in Anchorage (UAA), wrote a "cantata" about Corrie. Munger used two "poems" written as "memorials" to Corrie but not to any of the victims of the terrorists the ISM promotes, one by San Francisco "poet" Phil Goldvarg and another by Sri Lanka "poet" Thushara Wijeratna. We are not sure but we think that one of those may also have composed the famous work of poetry, "Here I sit broken-hearted, paid my dime." The initial performance of the "cantata" was cancelled by UAA of Alaska in Anchorage (UAA), wrote a "cantata" about Corrie. Munger used two "poems" written as "memorials" to Corrie but not to any of the victims of the terrorists the ISM promotes, one by San Francisco "poet" Phil Goldvarg and another by Sri Lanka "poet" Thushara Wijeratna. We are not sure but we think that one of those may also have composed the famous work of poetry, "Here I sit broken-hearted, paid my dime."The initial performance of the "cantata" was cancelled by UAA due to the outcry from the Alaskan Jewish community, also sometimes known as the Frozen Chosen. So now Munger and his gang are planning to inflict their "cantata" on Londoners. Munger has been exposed by a real composer as a charlatan here: http://www.williambowles.info/isrl-pal/corrie.html
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Posted
6/21/2005 01:41:00 PM
1. http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=569 Panty Bomber Israel has long tried to end the Middle East war by being nice to Palestinians. Peace through niceness is the foundation of the Oslo .peace process.. One part of this niceness is admitting Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza into Israeli hospitals, often for free. The bleeding hearts of the world have long demanded that Israel also stop searching ambulances run by the PLO and simply allow them through checkpoints without being searched, and never mind that they have long been used to transport explosives and terrorists.
Yesterday, Israel.s obsessive niceness and generosity in allowing Palestinians to use its hospitals was rewarded when a terrorist woman with explosives hidden in her panties attempted to gain admission to an Israeli hospital, where she planned to conduct a mass murder of Israeli children. PLO leaders promised that even though this heroic attempt to protest occupation failed, the next one will succeed. The 21-year old Arab woman from Gaza, who had been treated in an Israeli hospital for massive burns she received as a result of a gas tank explosion, was apprehended yesterday at the Erez Crossing wearing .explosive pants.. She said she had been directed to carry out her suicide attack inside the crowded Israeli hospital. The woman, Wafaa Samir Ibrahim Bass, had been given permission to cross the Gaza lines yesterday for admission to Soroka Medical Center in Be.er Sheva for continued medical treatment for her facial scars. .The terrorist infrastructure took advantage of her medical condition,. read an IDF statement, .in order to carry out a major suicide bombing attack inside Israel.. The resident of Jabaliya aroused the suspicion of the IDF soldiers at the crossing, who placed her in a side room for further checking via camera. During her security check, when she realized that the soldiers had discovered the explosive belt on her body, she attempted unsuccessfully to detonate it. It did not go off. The misnamed extremist pro-terror group Physicians for Human Rights , one of the main critics of Israel.s checking PLO ambulances for bombs and murderers, issued an insipid milquetoast statement in response to yesterday.s thwarted Palestinian terror attack inside the crowded hospital. The PHR in the past published openly anti-Semitic materials in its campaign to demonize Israel, and has never condemned PLO use of ambulances for terrorism, nor has it condemned PLO terrorism as a violation of human rights. There is no evidence that the PHR believes that Jews should be entitled to any human rights, such as the right to defend themselves. While reminding people that the PHR .will continue to work against the occupation. it stated yesterday that it .calls upon the Palestinian society and its leaders to strongly condemn the use of patients for violent purposes.. 2. The Latest Leftist-Islamofascist Medieval Blood Libel The PLO and its apologists have long been fond of spreading medieval bllod libels about Jews, such as how Jews drink gentile blood for Passover and poison the wells. Suha Arafat, wife of His Ugliness, made that latter claim while Hillary sat in the audience and politely applauded. Medieval anti-Semitism is quite common among the Moonbatocracy as well, increasingly claiming with a straight face that it was actually Dem Joos and not bin Laden who knocked down the World Trade Center towers to make al-Qaeda look bad. The latest blood libel being promoted by the Leftist-Islamofascist Axis of Evil is the mind-numbingly stupid claim that Israel is sending foods with carcinogens to Palestinians. The inventor of this story is terrorist Yusuf Abu Safia, the chairman of the PLO.s .Environmental Authority. (EA). Ordinarily the PLO does not exhibit great environmentalist concern, such as for the need to prevent the polluting of the environment with body parts of victims of PLO terrorism. But Abu Safia is claiming that Israel has dumped into the Palestinian market food and fruit laced with carcinogens. That story is this week being carried by the pro-terror Islam Online web site and also is being repeated by the Moonbat Left. Oh, and the carcinogen in the food? Saccarine! Really! This, from an .Environmental Chairman. who has never gotten around to suggesting an anti-smoking campaign among Palestinians. Abu Safia is cited there as saying: .This chemical (saccarine) is highly dangerous to public health and has been banned since 1982 around the globe as studies held it as the main culprit behind cancer. Frozen meat, summer vegetables and fruit have been injected with chemicals and exposed to radition which mutated into double of their size.. Abu Safia further went on to warn that Palestinian children .playfully and unawaringly play with Israeli games that beam radioactive rays.. He said Egyptian border authorities seized two shipments of carcinogenic and radioactive Israeli games last month. Other PLO terrorists have long claimed that Israel has used chemical weapons against the Palestinians. The Holocaust Denying Egyptian al-Ahram, controlled by the goverment, has repeated the lies. The PLO.s house journal claims Israel uses poison gas against schoolgirls. Poisoned food has in fact been used in the Middle East war against the Jews, but by the PLO . The story is already showing up on those .Indymedia. Indymoonbat web sites. We figure Alex Cockburn and his crew will be running it before the week is up on Counterpunch. http://moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/?p=568 3. Looking for an explanation for Sharon's Peresque behavior? Try this: http://gamla.org.il/english/article/2005/june/g5.htm 4. Anti-Zionist Hebrew University Professor of Sociology Baruch Kimmerling does not like free speech in the form of "Talkbacks": http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/590206.html Are you surprised?
Monday, June 20, 2005
Posted
6/20/2005 11:00:00 AM
1. Another Counter-Punch Self-Hating Jew By Steven Plaut FrontPageMagazine.com | June 20, 2005
During World War II, there were Jewish "kapos" in Nazi concentration camps who were forced by the threat of immediate death to collaborate with the Germans and performs jobs involved in the murder of other Jews. We should not be too fast to judge them, given their dire circumstances and desperate desire to stay alive. There are today, however Jewish leftists who would like nothing better than to assist Jew-hating Arabs in creating a Second Holocaust of Jews, and their slavish and servile collaboration with genocidal Islamo-fascists has nothing to do with threats to their own lives. Almost every self-hating Jew on the planet capable of banging on a keyboard is today either a columnist for the anti-American web magazine Counterpunch, run by Alexander Cockburn, or is an object of Counterpunch?s celebration. Counterpunch runs Norman Finkelstein, whom even the Anti-Defamation League has declared a Holocaust denier. It regularly runs the anti-Israel lecturer Neve Gordon, a deep admirer of Finkelstein who has turned out dozens of articles attacking Israel for Cockburn, as well as Israel?s Lord Haw-Haw Uri Avnery, and dozens of other anti-Israel Jews. Now Counterpunch has decided to celebrate Gilad Atzmon, proudly proclaimed by Cockburn to be a ?CounterPuncher?. Who is Atzmon? Atzmon is a subliterate ex-Israeli saxophone player living in Britain, where he is active in numerous anti-Semitic organizations. He is one of the ultras in the UK trying to organize boycotts of Israel, and is well-known for his defense of the burning down of synagogues. He is a communist; the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) has just invited Gilad Atzmon to appear at their annual convention this July, "Marxism 2005". He has already spoken before the pro-Castro ?Trots? twice and tooted his saxophone for them. (Wouldn?t these ?Trotskyites? be surprised to hear that Trotsky?s own grandson is a militant Zionist ?settler? in the West Bank today?) Atzmon's ravings are carried on the PLO-front web site "one-state.org,? devoted to solving the problem of Israel's existence with the formation of a single Palestinian state in which Jews are delivered to the supporters of Hamas and the al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. Atzmon has turned out numerous anti-Israel articles for the Cockburns, and these have been run frequently on Counterpunch. There he has endorsed Islamofascist terrorism as a way to create a "balance of power" that can deter the US and has written: "If Islamic militants could practically endanger our existence we would have to listen to them with great respect. We would then have to look for a genuine means towards reconciliation." Atzmon is so openly anti-Semitic that he has been denounced by the ordinary plain-vanilla anti-Zionist Leftists running around Britain. Many of these have demanded that the SWP renege on its invitation to Atzmon to speak before their convocation. A radical named Tony Greenstein has publicized demands on the forum of the so-called Just Peace UK for Atzmon not to appear at the Trotskyite cotillion. Greenstein has publicly declared that Atzmon is an open anti-Semite, that Atzmon is associated with open anti-Semites, and a Holocaust Denier or, at the very least, an apologist for them. In any case, the open Holocaust Deniers themselves proudly proclaim Atzmon to be one of their own. David Irving just loves Atzmon. It is always of interest to see Alexander Cockburn and David Irving, who has actually been convicted of Holocaust denial in a court of law, sharing the same affections. Atzmon for his part has denounced his anti-Zionist Jewish critics on al-Jazeera. Atzmon insists that, ?every Israeli and Diaspora Zionist Jew is a potential zio-agent.? On al-Jazeera he has also attacked British Jews in general in an article entitled "Protocols of the Elders of London", a naked affirmation of the old Czarist forgery. Atzmon proudly declares: " Holocaust Denial is in itself a Zionist terminology and I refuse to accept it or to use it." Atzmon has personally circulated neonazi and Holocaust Denial materials, including materials that support Ernst Zundel, who was recently deported from Canada to Germany for his Nazi activities in North America. He is so openly anti-Semitic that he has attempted to recruit the medieval libels about Jews as Christ-killers as ammunition against them. Atzmon has tried to fan anti-Semitism by repeating the urban legends about the supposedly all-powerful "Zionist Lobby", legends that one ordinarily has to go to neonazi web sites in order to read. He writes: "On reflection, it must be terrifying that such a small lobby from a tiny state is so eager to push the rest of the world into endless confrontation." Among the main "mistakes of Israelis" Atzmon has discovered for his Counterpunch readers, have been "To believe that the creation of the state of Israel was an outcome of the Holocaust; To be convinced that the 'Jewish state' is a legitimate concept; To regard themselves as humanists: To be sure that Israel is immortal." Atzmon certainly regards Israel as mortal and openly wants to see it destroyed. The genocide of Jews that would accompany its destruction is just one of those unfortunate minor side effects from doing what people like Cockburn and Atzmon think is the right thing to do. The Guardian, which no one could suspect of having Zionist sympathies, quotes Atzmon in this way: "Gilad Atzmon, a pro-Palestine advocate, gave a talk to students this month, arguing: 'I'm not going to say whether it is right or not to burn down a synagogue, I can see that it is a rational act." That comment places Atzmon outside the circle of ordinary Jewish self-hating leftists merely seeking the destruction of Israel, and qualifies him for the title of Britain's leading kapo-wannabe. The only legitimate lesson of Auschwitz that Atzmon can see is that Israel needs to be destroyed and conservatives delegitimized: "Auschwitz stands as a symbol of partnership between the European parliamentary left and the American expansionist right. For both, Auschwitz stands as an icon of threat against the image of open society, within the prospect of this fatal bond, any European genuine left is destined to be pushed to the margin. Any form of genuine left inspired by red aspirations is doomed to be presented as a subversive and radical outlook. In March 1998, Robin Cook, then the British foreign minister, paid a diplomatic visit to Israel. While there, Cook rightly refused to visit Yad Vashem (Holocuast Museum and Memorial), claiming that he was concerned with the future rather than with the past. It wasn't long before Cook lost his job. The refusal to bow to the Auschwitz tale cost Cook his job." Cockburn just can't get enough of this crackpot and this week runs a piece by one Mary Rizzo, a moonbette who lives in Italy, who has written repeatedly in support of Atzmon, and who once again sings the praises of Atzmon for the Counterpunch crowd. Rizzo?s piece is devoted to defending Atzmon from the accusations against him of other Bash-Israel British Leftists who claim that he is a neonazi and is embarrassing the Left. This was not the first such sycophant piece in Counterpunch celebrating the would-be synagogue-burner Atzmon. Jeffrey St. Clair, who co-authored with Alexander Cockburn a "book" devoted to the theme that it is unreasonable to call people anti-Semites simply because they want to see all the Jews murdered, has taken crayon to hand to sing Atzmon's praises as well. Should new concentration camps for Jews ever be erected by the Islamofascists, with the help of their leftist allies, we expect to see Gilad Atzmon sitting there by the gate as the cattle cars are unloaded, playing his sax, with Alexander Cockburn dancing in the street. 2. Git(mo) yours now: http://www.thecampaignstore.com/store/itemdetail.asp?id=227&rname=MAF 3. Disrupting the Campus Pogroms: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18486 Also, visit http://www.stoptheism.com/ 4. Robert F. Maguire Jr., the chief pilot of Operation Magic Carpet, which evacuated more than 40,000 Jewish refugees from Yemen to the newly created state of Israel between late 1948 and early 1950, died on June 10 at his home in Northridge, Calif. He was 94. He died of natural causes, said his son Robert F. Maguire III. Starting in November 1947, when the United Nations voted to partition Palestine, Arabs and Jews were at war. Pogroms against the Jews of Yemen soon followed. In an operation that was arduous, dangerous and secret, nearly the entire Jewish population of Yemen was evacuated beginning in December 1948. The flight from Yemen to Israel, a journey of more than 1,400 miles, was almost entirely over hostile territory. Though the evacuation was kept secret for fear of sabotage, the planes were routinely fired on by Egyptian forces. Fuel was scarce. Pilots were warned that if they were forced to land in enemy territory, the passengers, and perhaps the crew, risked being executed. Requiring a little more than a year and 380 flights, Operation Magic Carpet evacuated 40,000 to 50,000 Yemenite Jews without loss of life. David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, was reported to have called Mr. Maguire "the Irish Moses." The writer Leon Uris based a character in his 1958 novel, "Exodus," on him. Robert Francis Maguire Jr. was born in Portland, Ore., on Jan. 7, 1911. His father, Robert Francis Sr., was a lawyer who became a judge at the Nuremberg war-crimes trials in the late 1940's. Robert Jr. began flying as a teenager, later attending Reed College and the University of Oregon. He enlisted in the Army Air Corps the day after Pearl Harbor, and flew in the Pacific region in the war. After the war, Mr. Maguire became a pilot for Alaska Airlines. With the creation of the State of Israel in May 1948, the airline won a contract to fly Jewish refugees there from around the globe. Mr. Maguire flew thousands of Jews out of Shanghai before being sent to the Middle East to help start Operation Magic Carpet in conjunction with the American Joint Jewish Distribution Committee, a humanitarian organization. An ancient, nomadic people, Yemenite Jews had been oppressed since the advent of Islam in the eighth century. But their deliverance into Israel was prophesied in a line from the Book of Isaiah: "They shall mount up with wings as eagles." When news of the planned evacuation reached them, they walked, sometimes hundreds of miles, carrying Bibles and Torah scrolls, until they reached a refugee camp at the British protectorate of Aden, on the southern tip of Yemen. The pilots left each morning from their base in Asmara, Eritrea, and landed at Aden to pick up passengers. Few of the Yemenite Jews had ever seen an airplane. But the airline painted an eagle with outstretched wings over the door of each craft, and the Yemenites went aboard. As many as 28 pilots at a time were involved in the operation, which involved carrying the refugees to Tel Aviv, flying back to the safety of Cyprus for the night, and returning to Asmara at dawn before starting over again, a round trip of about 20 hours. When Alaska Airlines had to withdraw a few months into the operation, Mr. Maguire started his own company, Near East Air Transport, and hired planes and pilots to continue the job. The work cost him his career. In the region, Mr. Maguire contracted a parasite that affected his heart and as a result he lost his commercial pilot's license in the early 1950's. In later years he worked as a pension-fund manager. Last year, Mr. Maguire, an Episcopalian, was awarded a medal of valor by the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Mr. Maguire's first marriage, to the former Jean Shepard, ended in divorce. He is survived by their three children: Robert F. III, of Los Angeles; Gilbert, of Ventura, Calif.; and Alix of Long Beach, Calif.; a sister, Constance Wilson of Brookings, Ore.; eight grandchildren; and eight great-grandchildren. Mr. Maguire's second wife, the former Edith Barnick, died in 2002. In Operation Magic Carpet, Mr. Maguire relied as much on his wits as on his aviation skills. He once ran out of fuel and was forced to land in Egypt. When airport officials rushed up to the plane, Mr. Maguire ordered them to send ambulances immediately. "What for?" they asked him. "I have smallpox on board," Mr. Maguire replied. He got his fuel, and flew on to Tel Aviv. Robert Maguire Jr., the commercial pilot from Oregon who was dubbed the "Irish Moses" for helping fly tens of thousands of Jewish refugees through hostile territory from Yemen to Israel in 1949, died June 10 at his home in Los Angeles. He was 94. The World War II veteran was working for Alaska Airlines in late 1948 when the company was contracted by the American Joint Distribution Committee to fly Jewish refugees from Yemen, where they had been oppressed for centuries, to the newly established state of Israel. As the chief pilot of Operation Magic Carpet, Maguire helped transport more than 40,000 refugees on nearly 400 flights, a successful airlift that prompted Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to call Maguire the "Irish Moses." The operation was a secret one because it was feared that the planes would be shot down by Arab forces, who were at war with Israel. While they were often shot at, none of the planes crashed and no lives were lost. After Alaska Airlines withdrew from the operation, Maguire kept it going by buying or leasing planes and setting up Near East Air Transport. Not many of Maguire's Jewish passengers were aware that their pilot was an American of Irish and British descent who had been raised an Episcopalian. Over the years, Maguire never sought acknowledgment for his role in the operation, modestly saying that he was "just doing my job." In 2004, however, Maguire was awarded a medal of valor from the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles for his "heroic efforts that helped rescue tens of thousands of Jews." http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/news/local/11916006.htm 5. June 20, 2005 Ethnomathematics By DIANE RAVITCH June 20, 2005; Page A14 It seems our math educators no longer believe in the beauty and power of the principles of mathematics. They are continually in search of a fix that will make it easy, relevant, fun, and even politically relevant. In the early 1990s, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics issued standards that disparaged basic skills like addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, since all of these could be easily performed on a calculator. The council preferred real life problem solving, using everyday situations. Attempts to solve problems without basic skills caused some critics, especially professional mathematicians, to deride the "new, new math" as "rainforest algebra." In a comparison of a 1973 algebra textbook and a 1998 "contemporary mathematics" textbook, Williamson Evers and Paul Clopton found a dramatic change in topics. In the 1973 book, for example, the index for the letter "F" included "factors, factoring, fallacies, finite decimal, finite set, formulas, fractions, and functions." In the 1998 book, the index listed "families (in poverty data), fast food nutrition data, fat in fast food, feasibility study, feeding tours, ferris wheel, fish, fishing, flags, flight, floor plan, flower beds, food, football, Ford Mustang, franchises, and fund-raising carnival." Those were the days of innocent dumbing-down. Now mathematics is being nudged into a specifically political direction by educators who call themselves "critical theorists." They advocate using mathematics as a tool to advance social justice. Social justice math relies on political and cultural relevance to guide math instruction. One of its precepts is "ethnomathematics," that is, the belief that different cultures have evolved different ways of using mathematics, and that students will learn best if taught in the ways that relate to their ancestral culture. From this perspective, traditional mathematics -- the mathematics taught in universities around the world -- is the property of Western Civilization and is inexorably linked with the values of the oppressors and conquerors. The culturally attuned teacher will learn about the counting system of the ancient Mayans, ancient Africans, Papua New Guineans, and other "non-mainstream" cultures. Partisans of social justice mathematics advocate an explicitly political agenda in the classroom. A new textbook, "Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by the Numbers," shows how problem solving, ethnomathematics and political action can be merged. Among its topics are: "Sweatshop Accounting," with units on poverty, globalization, and the unequal distribution of wealth. Another topic, drawn directly from ethnomathematics, is "Chicanos Have Math in Their Blood." Others include "The Transnational Capital Auction," "Multicultural Math," and "Home Buying While Brown or Black." Units of study include racial profiling, the war in Iraq, corporate control of the media, and environmental racism. The theory behind the book is that "teaching math in a neutral manner is not possible." Teachers are supposed to vary the teaching of mathematics in relation to their students' race, gender, ethnicity, and community. This fusion of political correctness and relevance may be the next big thing to rock mathematics education, appealing as it does to political activists and to ethnic chauvinists. It seems terribly old-fashioned to point out that the countries that regularly beat our students in international tests of mathematics do not use the subject to steer students into political action. They teach them instead that mathematics is a universal language that is as relevant and meaningful in Tokyo as it is in Paris, Nairobi and Chicago. The students who learn this universal language well will be the builders and shapers of technology in the 21st century. The students in American classes who fall prey to the political designs of their teachers and professors will not. Ms. Ravitch is a historian of education at New York University, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a member of the Koret Task Force at the Hoover Institution. URL for this article: http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111922877339463719,00.html
Sunday, June 19, 2005
Posted
6/19/2005 12:22:00 PM
1. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/neonazi-moonbat-embarrasses-rest-of.html A Neonazi Moonbat Embarrasses the Rest of the Left You know that the Bash-Israel web site calling itself "Deir Yassin Remembered" is off the charts when a large group of OTHER Far-Leftist Bash-Israel anti-Zionists are denouncing its director as an open neonazi and anti-Semite!
Paul Eisen is London-based co-director of Deir Yassin Remembered, a web site purporting to seek to commemorate the "massacre" of Arabs by Jews in 1948 at the village of Deir Yassin outside Jerusalem. The only problem is that no massacre at all took place there, and the claim that one did is little more than a medieval-style anti-Jewish blood libel. A battle did in fact take place there, since the village controlled access to then-besieged and starving Jerusalem, a battle in which some Arabs and Jews died. The Far Left and the Neonazi Right have long tried to turn the non-massacre of Deir Yassin into a bludgeon to demonize Israel and Jews. Among the people on the board of "Deir Yassin Remembered" are a Swedish Neonazi calling himself "Israel Shamir", convicted traitor and spy Mordecai Vanunu, Saudi-financed ex-Congressman Paul Findlay, PLO spokeswoman Hanan Ashrawi, and similar jihadniks of their ilk. The site is a thinly-disguised front for the PLO. DePaul's Holocaust-Denier Norman Finkelstein has evidently just been dropped from the board of the site, being too much of an embarrassment even for them. Paul Eisen has aroused the fury of the rest of the Bash-Israel Jew-baiters by abandoning the common pretense of being "anti-Israel but not anti-Jewish", a posture so beloved by most of the rest of the Left. He has been publishing openly anti-Semitic materials, claiming that Jews are plotting to take over the world, and openly supporting Palestinian atrocities against Jews. When other anti-Israel Leftists were horrified by this, they tried to get the web sites publishing Eisen to print their own rebuttal of Eisen but they were refused. Eisen's "analysis" has also been published by the "Zundelsite", the web site of Ernst Zundel who was recently deported by Canada to Germany due to his open nazi activities in North America. Eisen openly praises Zundel and the adoration is mutual. Eisen openly collaborates with Swedish neonazi Shamir, himself a close ally of Zundel. Eisen also writes anti-Jewish pieces for the anti-Semitic Egyptian daily al-Ahram. Anyway, Eisen is such an embarrassment for those anti-Israel leftists, who prefer to perpetuate the myth of there being an anti-Zionism that is not also anti-Semitism, that they have organized a petition against Eisen and those who publish him. Among the signatories are people who are only marginally less openly anti-Semitic than Eisen himself, and include some of Israel's worst academic moonbats. Other neofascist leftists however are rallying to Eisen's defense. (see web site for clean copy and links) 2. Pet Murderers: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/peta-murders-cuddly-pets.html 3. Dubya Dubbing Desert Dingbats: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/dubya-is-dubbing-desert-dingbats.html
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Posted
6/16/2005 01:05:00 PM
1. Sharon's Gift to Terror: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18412
2. Amnesty International Defends Communist Terrorists in Nepal Just when we think that Amnesty International could not be further from being a neutral objective human right watchdog group, along come the Amnesty Moonbats to prove that they can. Anyone thinking that Amnesty International is something other than a pro-communist anti-American propaganda group - think again! Amnesty's new cause, besides bashing America and Israel, is to help the communist terrorists inside Nepal murder people. On June 6, Maoist insurgents blew up a packed passenger bus killing 40 people and injuring over 70 others. Over 12,000 people have been killed in the nine-year-old Maoist insurgency. Communist insurgents inside Nepal routinely carry out mass murderes and other atrocities. The Nepal Communist Party (Maoist) recently dragged out wives and relatives of Nepalese Army personnel in middle of the night to the jungle and cut them to pieces, including one year child. The Amnesty people demand that the West stop arming the Nepalese government lest it defend its civilians from communist terrorism. Amnesty reportedly has been awarded donations amounting to US $ 25 Million for its "role" in Nepal, which is to help the Maoists. "Arms should not be exported as long as there is a clear risk that they might be used to commit serious human rights abuse," said Amnesty's Asia-Pacific programme director Purna Sen. Huh? As usual, Amnesty has things exactly Asia-backwards when it comes to who really is the terrorist murderer and who is the victim, similar to its long track record in the Middle East of reversing abuser and abused. Amnesty, which wants Bush arrested as a war criminal, recently denounced the US for making captured Iraqi terrorists listen to Sesame Street. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/amnesty-international-defends.html 3. More on Jewish slave holders: A Plaut Lister from the south has an interesting set of stories: As long as you wrote this piece, I'll share with you a story which is an exception to your conclusion about no Jewish slave trade, and is therefore also instructive: As the story in my family runs, we Sones' have been in the US for at least 7 generations, and our fathers owned slaves in Louisiana. Ignorant of Jewish law, but wanting to fulfill whatever ethical aspects of which he was aware, my great great etc. grandfather would free his slaves every seven years, even though this practice is mandated for eved ivri (Jewish servant) alone. This habit enraged the other slave owners, and when he once freed a slave whom he owned in partnership with a gentile slave owner, he was tarred and feathered and then ostracized, setting about a chain of events that probably accounts for my sitting here and writing you this today. There is a sequel to the story: When I was seventeen I flew out to Anaheim, California to pass out corruption-expose leaflets at a financial guru's greed conference that was being held in a hotel there. I reserved a room at a nearby motel through AAA, and had my father's credit card with me to pay upon arrival. I arrived around 1 or 2 in the morning. (Another time I'll tell you the story of my encounter with the Breslover chassidim in LAX airport..) The girl at the desk checked the reservation and gave me my key. When I went to present the credit card, she said there was no need, as it was all paid for. "How can that be? I have my father's card right here - nobody paid you.." She said no, here it is, paid for with the credit card of Ronald Sones, my father. "Let me see that.." I said, puzzled, but then realized that it was just a freaky coincidence, as my father is Ronald H. Sones, and this was a payment made by one Ronald R. Sones. It turned out that another Ronald Sones was staying in that motel the same time as I was. Being that Sones is not that common a name, I asked the girl which room he was in - maybe we are related and I could discover a long lost family member. "Well, I don't think you're related," said the girl. "Why not?" "Because he's black..." 4. David Hornik on Israeli cowardice: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18426 5. David Hornik on Dating in Jerusalem: http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8300 6. More PLO Blood Libels: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18442 7. McMoonbats: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/mcmoonbats.html
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Posted
6/15/2005 11:14:00 AM
1. DePaul Gets Sued for Suppressing Free Speech (http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/depaul-gets-sued-for-suppressing-free.html) The really interesting question we have is whether DePaul "University" will hire the Michael Jackson Defense Team or the OJ Team. Yes, DePaul "University" is getting sued by Thomas Klocek. We put the term in quotes because we do not think the heads of DePaul have any interest in maintaining academic standards, scholarly quality, or academic integrity, and until they change their minds they should not be considered a real university. Just to remind you of the background to all this, DePaul is a Chicago campus in which Norman Finkelstein, a notorious anti-Semite who has been described as a Holocaust Denier by the Anti-Defamation League, a pseudo-scholar whose anti-Jewish rants are carried by every neonazi web magazine on earth, is retained as an assistant professor of political science, but the very same university has fired Prof. Thomas Klocek because he dared answer back to radical student jihadniks handing out their propaganda on campus. Klocek was fired because the administration believes that he holds "incorrect opinions" about the Middle East. Klocek believes Israel has the right to exist and defend itself and that "Palestinians" are an artificial construct. Klocek was fired after talking back to anti-Israel campus activists in a manner his Dean thought was impolite. Meanwhile, Finkelstein is almost universally regarded as a Holocaust Denier, a Jewish traitor and anti-Semite, and at the very least a fraud and quack. His charlatan "scholarship" and neonazi ideas were recently documented at length by Harvard's Alan Dershowitz. Klocek, in contrast, is a serious and popular teacher, who was dismissed without a hearing because he offended some campus extremists. Depaul has some bizarre notions of free speech. While its President Dennis H. Holtschneider publicly defends the employment of Finkelstein as a professor, defends the operation on campus of a Bash-Israel propaganda show dressed up as an art exhibit and the performance on the Catholic University campus of the "Vagina Monologues", he has repeatedly denounced Klocek and defended the firing of Klocek because Klocek expressed politically incorrect views. This week a defamation suit was filed in Illinois. Cook County Chancery, charging that DePaul University and its leadership defamed Professor Thomas Klocek when DePaul publicly characterized arguments he presented to members of Palestinian and Muslim student groups as racist and bigoted. The suit seeks damages against DePaul for maligning Klocek.s integrity and professional competence. The defendants named include: DePaul University, Rev. Dennis Holtschneider - President of DePaul, and Susan Dumbleton - Dean of DePaul.s School for New Learning. The case was assigned to Judge David Donnersberger. Holtschneider has been denounced by David French, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE): .DePaul has unquestionably violated Professor Klocek.s due process rights, and the university did so because his statements were offensive to the students. While DePaul may now argue that the issue is one of professionalism, its public statements at the time of Klocek.s punishment make it clear that Klocek.s real crime was offending students during an out-of-class discussion of a controversial and emotional topic. Academic freedom cannot survive when professors who engage in debate on controversial topics are subject to administrative punishment without even the most cursory due process.. Rev. Dennis Holtschneider contacted media outlets across the country to slander Klocek and even publicly tried to make Klocek.s health an issue. A letter of his was published in April 9, 2005 edition of The Rocky Mountain News, where Holtschneider wrote, .Last September, Klocek acted in a belligerent and menacing manner toward students who were passing out literature at a table in the cafeteria. He raised his voice, threw pamphlets at students, pointed his finger near their faces and displayed a gesture interpreted as obscene.. DePaul offered to give Klocek a spring quarter class assignment if he met with the students to apologize for his behavior and if the program director could drop by his class to ensure that the health issues that affected his teaching were resolved. He refused.. We suspect the jury members from the Michael Jackson trial might believe Holtschneider's version of the events. Funny how Holtschneider does not think that Finkelstein should have his own (mental) health evaluated by a good shrink before being allowed to abuse DePaul students with his politicized in-class propagandizing against Jews. For more details about the suit, visit our good friends at http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/. Wanna tell Holtschneider what YOU think? His email address is dholtsch@depaul.edu. 2. New Orleans Hires a Racist in the name of Sensitivity: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18433 3. Pacifists for Genocide led by Ex-Israeli Moonbette and Pappette: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18410
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Posted
6/14/2005 03:27:00 PM
Jewish Slave Owners and Similar Lies by Steven Plaut
One of the more common claims by the Afrofascist wing of the Moonbat 'hood and its leftist apologists is the claim that Jews were the main holders and traders in African slaves. FPM recently ran a piece on one the main inventors of the libel, Louis "Calypso Lou" Farrakhan, on the occasion of his being honored by Bill Clinton. In late 1991, Farrakhan's Nation of Islam published "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews," to indict, in effect, today's Jews for everything from the ownership of South American sugar plantations three centuries ago to Jewish participation in the Confederate war effort. Similar claims have long been commonly made by people such as Leonard Jeffries. A.M. Rosenthal of the New York Times wrote that Jeffries "says in a public forum that the Jews financed the slave trade. That is not quite the equivalent of [the accusation] Christ-killer, but coming close, make no mistake." I asked Rosenthal too what actual role Jews played in black slavery. "There was none," he replied. "Except for the most peripheral way. If at all." Interestingly, similar claims have long been made by white supremecist neonazi groups such as "Jewish Tribal Review," as a way to fan hatred of Jews. Without a doubt, the largest number of slave holders in the Western Hemisphere were Hispanics! Interesting, isn't it, how Farrkhan, Jeffries, and their apologists have never targeted Hispanics in their campaign to demonize slave holders! How come they have never demanded that HISPANICS pay reparations or at least lose affirmative action preferences supposedly compensating victims of slavery? Such claims have been fed inadvertantly by whining Jewish liberals such as Prof. Ralph Austen from the University of Chicago, who writes about the guilt of Jewish slave holder sin such arenas as Ultra-Moonbat Tikkun Magazine. While conceding that the Jews were - at most - marginal in the world of slavery, Austen nevertheless insiusts that Jews must feel guilty and atone for that small role. So just how many Jews were involved in the trade and ownership of African slves in the New World? In his newest book, "Black Rednecks and White Liberals," Stanford professor and Hoover Institute author Thomas Sowell answers. The number of black slaves owned by Jewish slaveowners in the American south was fewer than the number owned by free blacks or the number owned by American Indians! (It goes without saying that it was far smaller than the number of Jews murdered over the years by black street criminals.) So much for the attempts to paint the Jews into the role of the "enslavers" and blacks as their victims. Afrofascist rage would be better focused against free-black and American Indian slave owners than against Jews. Others have shown that the Jews played practically no role in the slave trade, such as "Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight," By Eli Faber. In the Middle Ages, when slavery was common in Europe (including enslaved Jews), some Jews did play a minor role as slave traders for white European slaves who had been enslaved in war or due to debts. They were sold mainly to other Europeans and sometimes to the Ottomans. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/jewish-slave-owners-and-similar-lies.html
Posted
6/14/2005 10:00:00 AM
1. A Bulldozed Mosque the Moonbats are Ignoring The lib'ruh media have been having so much fun wringing their hands over make-pretend and retracted stories about evil Westerners mistreating Moslems and the Qoran that they have overlooked one fantastic story. It seems that Zimbabwe's murderous moonbat dictator has destroyed a mosque. Yes, Mark Steyn, in the Washington Times, reports that in his campaign to bulldoze as many homes of Zimbabwe's population as possible, Bobby Mugabe ordered that a mosque be destroyed, in Hatcliffe Extension, a shantytown on the edge of Harare. It was razed by the "police." Mugabe also bulldozed a Catholic-run Aids center. Not a word from Newsweek. No Pakistani rioters trashing Westerners. No calls from the Baathist URUKNET to destroy the "Crusaders". And only a matter of a hours before Counterpunch blames Dem Joos for the destroyed Zimbabwe Mosque. (We are waiting for Al Cockburn to take his whole crew to Zimbabwe to experience "obesity tourism", enjoying the complete absence of nutrition in the country! They can use the time off down there to denounce capitalism.) 2. Washington Post - Al-Jazeera on the Potomac? The Washington Post should really be renamed Al-Jazeera on the Potomac, at least when it comes to the Middle East. Our good friends over at the "Eye on the Post" blog have been doing an excellent job in documenting naked bias at the Post. But this weekend the Post outdid itself. As you recall, a few days ago the PLO once again demonstrated its commitment to peace and tranquility and democratization by executing a group of Palestinians it accused of "collaborating with Israel." All those Moonbats who love to wail about imaginary abuses of the human rights of Arabs by Israel had nothing to say about this latest atrocity against innocent Arab civilians. How come the ISM latte-sippers were not serving as human shields for the victims? Now never mind that the whole Oslo peace process was supposedly about how the PLO had agreed to collaborate with Israel to suppress terrorism and calm the region. Even officials for the PLO themselves admitted that the executed people were actually all innocent. They were executed by the Palestinian Authority after Mahmoud Abbas gave his approval. But none of that mattes for the Washington Post. The Washington Post used an AP report on the story, but changed the language to make it look like Israel was to blame for the atrocity! The Post then went on to bemoan Israel's assassination of a leading Islamist terrorist last week, but neglected to mention the sorts of atrocities the perp had aleady committed and was still planning. The "Eye on the Post" folks define their mission: "EyeOnThePost.Org, the operating name for Eye On The Post, Inc., was formed as a result of The Washington Post's skewed coverage of news in the Middle East. The catalyst was The Washington Post's false reporting of a massacre in Jenin by the Israeli Defense Forces following the Passover bombings in April, 2002. Palestinians, aided by reporters looking for ... indeed hoping for ... a story of mass atrocities committed by Israel's military, fabricated a web of lies. Not only did all of these false news articles prove to have been lies, but the truth that eventually seeped out was that Israel's defense forces went out of their way to spare civilian lives at a substantial cost of an excessive loss of their own lives. The Post never effectively apologized, and it never adequately reported the humanitarian measures actually taken by the IDF to avoid excessive loss of Palestinian civilian lives. " Meanwhile it was revealed that Arab terrorists are trying a new tactic - wrapping explosives around the bodies of babies. Really. It was reported that the leader of a Syrian terrorist cell who was killed in a confrontation with security forces last week had planned to wrap explosives around the body of a one-year-old baby before placing her in the Justice Ministry, the girl's grandmother was quoted Sunday as saying. The grandmother, identified only by her first name, Zarifa, said her son, Ahmed, the baby's father, had died while planting a roadside bomb on the Damascus-Zabadani road in late January, according to the Al-Thawra newspaper. The story did not interest the Washington Post. 3. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/rabbi-moonbat-and-tikkun-cannabis.html Rabbi Moonbat and Cannabis Zionism 4. T Rex and his SUV: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=15115 5. Arabs against Terrorism: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18401
Sunday, June 12, 2005
Posted
6/12/2005 05:17:00 PM
1. The New Middle East version of the RCA Puppy and Gramophone Ridiculous "rumors" believed in the Middle East about supposed mishandling of the Koran are not restricted to the usual Islamofascists accusing the "Crusaders" and the "Zionists" of plotting against the naby Arab fascist regimes. (Come to think of it, the world would be a lot better off these days with a lot more Crusaders and Zionists in the Middle East!) Now Israeli Arabs are all suddenly excited over a story that is circulating in the Arab press and television about a girl who was turned into a dog by Allah for mishandling a Koran. Really. A Muslim girl from Taibeh was punished by Allah and turned into a dog, according to rumors that have been circulating in the Arab-Israeli town this week, Arab-language newspaper Panorama reported. According to the rumors, the harsh punishment was meted out after the girl, upset by her mother.s request to bring her the Quran as she was watching television, threw the holy Muslim book at the mother with disdain. Women in Taibeh claimed they saw the story featured on Palestinian television. Now - doesn't the very fact that no US troops in Gitma were turned into puppies prove that the Newsweek story was hogwash? Even though the Moonbat Left still insists the original Newsweek story, now retracted, was correct? Keep your eyes open for the first report of this exciting dog of a story on Counterpunch and "The Nation"! 2. ISRAEL'S DEADLY DELUSIONS By EDWARD ALEXANDER THE OSLO SYNDROME: Delusions of a People Under Siege By Kenneth Levin Smith and Kraus, 352 pages, $35 IN this massively researched, lu cidly written and cogently ar gued narrative, Kenneth Levin tells the appalling story of what has been called the greatest self-inflicted wound of political history: Israel's embrace of Yasser Arafat and the PLO in the Oslo Accords of September 1993 and its dogged adherence to its obligations under them even as its "peace partner" was blatantly flouting its own. The book is divided into two sections. The first recounts Jewish political failure in the Diaspora, where Jews lived with a constant burden of peril, as the background for the self-deluding rationales that engendered Oslo. The second traces the same self-delusions in the history of Israel itself. Levin shows how a tiny nation, living under constant siege by neighbors who have declared its very existence an aggression, was induced by its intellectual classes to believe that its own misdeeds had incited Arab hatred and violence, and that what required reform was not Arab dictatorship and Islamicist anti-Semitism, but the Jews themselves. Reversing cause and effect, Israeli leaders blinded themselves to the (obvious) fact that it was Arab hatred and aggression that repeatedly led to Israeli occupation, not occupation that caused Arab hatred and violence. Although Levin argues strongly that Israeli leaders like Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak and the ineffable Shimon Peres hallucinated moderation in a murderous enemy, his book is not a polemic that excludes all opposing points of view; on the contrary, we get the fullest possible account, and "in their own words," of those Israelis (and their American-Jewish supporters) who deluded themselves into believing that Oslo would bring a new heaven and a new earth. When the accords were signed in 1993, Minister of Education Shulamit Aloni announced that "no more parents will go weeping after the coffins of their sons" and Israeli novelist and "peace activist" Amos Oz said confidently that "death shall be no more." And all this because Arafat had . not for the first time . promised to renounce terror and recognize Israel's "right to exist." It was the used Buick he had already sold several times over. By autumn 2000, and as a direct (and in Levin's view entirely predictable) result of Israel's endless unreciprocated concessions to Arafat's demands, the country was faced with Intifada II, "the Oslo War," in which all Israel became a battlefield, and getting on a bus or going to a cafe or a disco meant risking your life. One of Levin's central themes is the influence of Israel's cultural elites on the governments of Rabin and Barak. In Israel as in America the motto of many intellectuals is "the other country, right or wrong"; but whereas in America leftist intellectuals now aspire only to take over the universities, in Israel they aspired to (and in one sense did) take over the government. The consequence: Israel was soon reminded of Churchill's judgment of England's intellectual appeasers: "Mr. Chamberlain was faced with a choice between surrender and war; he chose surrender, and he got war." Edward Alexander is author of "Irving Howe: Socialist, Critic, Jew." E-mail: eaengl@u.washington.edu Did you know that 3.8 million users visited New York Post Interactive at www.nypost.com making it the 5th most popular online newspaper nationwide?* 3. Rashid Khalidi - Plagiarist? I think that we will never tire of laughing at the academic disgraces of Columbia University, the Madrassah of the Upper West Side. The latest matter of mortification for the home of Joseph Massad and the one-time playground for Edward Said is the plagiarism of Rashid Khalidi . Khalidi, you may recall, is the pro-terror 'Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies' at Columbia University. Never mind that Edward Said knew nothing about Middle East Studies besides how to throw rocks at Jews and, instead, taught English at Columbia. Khalidi may be testifying on behalf of the Florida terrorist Sami al-Arian. Khalidi was a major player in the whitewash at Columbia of jihadnik professor Joseph Massad. FPM's Stephen Schwartz recent told the NY Sun: "His (Khalidi's) rhetoric is intemperate and extreme. I think the very idea of an Edward Said chair speaks for itself." Khalidi makes no secret of his support for Palestinian violence and his desire to see Israel's existence end. Khalidi also dislikes free speech for critics of the academic Jihadniki. He described Pipes. Campus Watch, which monitors and critiques Middle Eastern Studies, as .a McCarthyite attempt to silence the very few voices that speak out about the Middle East, and to impose by fear a uniformity of view on the campus debate.. Khalidi's plagiarism has been exposed by the wonderful folks over at Solomonia Blog. It involves an article that appears on the web site of the American Committee for Jerusalem, now renamed the American Task Force on Palestine. In 2001, the year the item was first posted, Khalidi was President of the ACJ. Entitled, JERUSALEM, A CONCISE HISTORY, it bore Khalidi's by-line for about four years. But then suddenly a reporter who was researching a story discovered the dirt. The article was retitled and the byline changed to read "Compiled by ACJ from a variety of sources." In other words, it was never Khalidi's own work to begin with! Gotcha! You can still see the original version as it existed from February 27, 2001 to October 23, 2004 -- complete with Khalidi's byline. The change, with no remark, explanation or trail left of the change, would tend to indicate that there was something there over which Khalidi and/or ACJ were concerned or embarrassed. The Moonbatmosphere has been barking at Alan Dershowitz over the discredited allegation that he had overused materials from another source, a book by Joan Peters. Moonbats, including neonazi Holocaust Denier Norman Finkelstein, have claimed that Dershowitz had "plagiarized" (this coming from someone like Finkelstein who routinely relies on David Irving as his source). So it will be interested seeing the response of the Moonbatorie to the news of Khalidi's plagiarizing. Since Khalidi is on the Saudi payroll, someone should warn them that they may be getting recycled materials written by other people and so are not getting their money's worth from Khalidi! Go to Solomonia to read the "Khalidi" piece in full! http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/rashid-khalidi-plagiarist.html 4. Indecent Acts: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/indecent-acts.html 5. Treason Chic: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/new-yorker-magazine-celebrates.html
Friday, June 10, 2005
Posted
6/10/2005 11:39:00 AM
The Genocidal Phantoms of the Oprah You know things are really getting out of hand when TV hostess Oprah Winfrey decides to go jihad.
Yes, Oprah, the waddling guru of the bored middle-class at-home housewives, has repeatedly taken time off from teaching her followers about closet organization and thigh reduction, in order to promote the Palestinian cause. She has run one-sided articles about the Middle East conflict on her show and and in her O Magazine. Whenever the subject of terrorism is broached on her show, Oprah studiously avoids allowing anyone to link it to Palestinians or the Hizbollah. She interviewed mothers of suicide bombers who were distraught because their houses were bulldozed. There was no mention of Israeli babies and their mothers being blown up in buses, pizza parlours blown to smithereens, nor Jewish teens murdered while at the disco inTel Aviv. Not even the Jews murdered when two guests of the International Solidarity Movement blew up Mike's Place in Tel Aviv. Debbie Schlussel has dubbed her the affable Joseph Goebbels of daytime talk TV. Columnist Naomi Ragen demolished Oprah for her politicized bias. The Anti-Defamation League has denounced her for bias, noting that 'Palestinian girls will be rescued when their leaders say "No" to the incitement, hate and violence that has permeated their political and cultural landscape for years now.' In the June issue, a feature article tries to arouse sympathy for a an 18-year-old Palestinian terrorist, Yusra Abdu, who was tried, convicted and is currently serving time in an Israeli jail for conspiring to perform a suicide bombing. The article tries to make the Palestinian wannabe mass-murderer appear humane and likeable. The propaganda article is written by one David France. He quotes enemies of Israel, leftists, and unidentified human rights activists, spouting false statistics. In the piece he asks, 'What would make a girl take such a radical and grisly step?' France "answers" himself when he quotes a moonbatish university professor, who asserts that: "religion is not the cause [of Palestinian suicide terror]... these are people who define their situation as hopeless. They feel that they have no way to respond against what they see as Israeli military aggression." Frnace forgot to add a detail to the story. The real reason the Oprah heroine set out to commit mass murder was that she was worried about getting punished for participating in a date! Because a date would have compromised Yusra honor and she might have found herself getting her throat slit by her brother or father. Is it any wonder that, as France himself writes, she confessed to Israeli security police that the real reason she wanted to blow herself up was "boredom?" Now in fact, the reason 18 year old Palestinians try to commit mass murder is because they are driven by a genocidal neonazi Islamofascist ideology instilled in them over decades by the PLO and its affiliates, all with the blessing and cheerleading of the Western Left. Hard as it is for an Oprah fan to understand, Palestinians want to mass murder Jews because they hate Jews and want to annihilate Jews. Not because they are "occupied." (They were mass murdering Jews long before any land was "occupied" by Israel in 1967.) And no one with an atlas can seriously suggest that Arabs murder Jews because Jews have too much land and Arabs not enough. Why would Oprah, who is not exactly hard up for cash, sell out and allow her magazine to be hijacked on behalf of Palestinian violence? Maybe Doctor Phil can tell us? (For clean copy with links, go to http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/genocidal-phantoms-of-oprah.html)
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Posted
6/09/2005 08:18:00 PM
1. Saddam's Worst Nightmare: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=15009 2. Purina: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/successful-israeli-resistance-against.html 3. Visit: http://www.worldjewishnewsagency.org/ 4. Leftist Rules of Debating: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/leftist-rules-of-debating.html 5. Letterman's "Top Ten Ways to Cheer Up Saddam Hussein" 10. Let him oppress just one Kurd a few hours a week 9. Surprise him with a year's supply of mustache dye 8. Bring him his old "World's Greatest Dictator" mug 7. Laugh at his impression of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad 6. Give him a collection of hilarious "Yo mullah's so fat" jokes 5. Remind him his one permitted phone call saved him 15% on his car insurance 4. Membership in the "Falafel of the Month Club" 3. Show him some of them "Hey, Vern" movies 2. Package of new underpants 1. Three words: Los Angeles jury
Posted
6/09/2005 11:37:00 AM
DePaul's Resident Nazi Exposed by Dershowitz (for clean copy and links, go to http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/depauls-resident-nazi-exposed-by.html) Professor Alan Dershowitz from Harvard has decided to expose some of the lies and the barely-hidden neonazi political agenda of "professor" Norman Finkelstein, an untenured assistant professor at DePaul University, the same school that this year fired Professor Thomas Klocek for daring to tell the truth abvout the "Palestinians" and Israel. Finkelstein has been defined as a Holocaust Denier by the Anti-Defamation League. Like so many neonazis, Finkelstein is a regular Cockburn Cockroach over at Counterpunch. Dershowitz has set up a site to "out" DePaul's Holocaust Denier. It is called 'The Committee to Expose Norman Finkelstein.s Close Connections to Neo-Nazism, Holocaust Denial, and His .Big Lie. of an .International Jewish Conspiracy.' The document's name is a bit long, but its contents are definitely worth reading through. Dershowitz made the mistake of debating Finkelstein a couple of years back, giving Finkelstein some exposure and making him appear as a legitimate "alternative researcher," which he decidedly is not. . While Dersh wiped the floor with Finkelstein, the latter and his neonazi followers have been spreading the version that Finkelstein "won" that debate. Now Finkelstein has crayoned a new "book" attacking in infantile terms Dershowitz's own fine book about Isreal. Dershowitz's exposure of Finkelstein's quack "opinions" and pseudo-scholarship is devastating. It is too long to reproduce here in full, but we provide a few small nuggets from the Dershowitz web site: Finkelstein Citations: Question: .[Mr. Finkelstein] If you are a historian, why didn't you write a serious study about the subject? Why didn.t you do research yourself? Interview people, etc.?. Finkelstein.s answer: .Why should I interview people?. .on obeying Chomsky .I.m a person of the left, and when you get a call from Professor Chomsky [asking you to .find. that a pro-Israeli book you haven.t even read was a .fraud.], his wish is your command.. .I don.t know about Judaism, but [neonazi Israel Shahak, an anti-Jewish zealot who wrote that Jews worship Satan] did. He knew it well. He took an interest in it and I have no doubt that what he wrote is accurate.. David Irving, the notorious Holocaust denier who claims there were no gas chambers and that Hitler was .the Jews. greatest friend,. is .a good historian. who has .made an .indispensable. contribution to our knowledge of World War II.. .All opinion-leaders, from the left to the right, are Jews.The Silence around my book in the US - if this is not a conspiracy, then what is one?. .Frankly, part of me says..you know what, we deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true.. One of the things he said on that last tape was that .until we live in security, you.re not going to live in security., and there is a certain amount of rightness in that.. And finally, .Never has one of my articles been published in a scientific magazine.. (Given that last admission, you might want to dash off an e-note to the heads of DePaul asking why a nazi loon like Finkelstein is still on their faculty. The list of their officers and emails is here. Other Finkelstein pronouncements can be viewed on the Dershowitz document. Finally, let us note that an Israeli far-leftist anti-Israel fanatic levturer from Ben Gurion University named Neve Gordon not only endorses Finkelstein's rantings but compares Finkelstein ethically to the Prophets of the Bible. If you would lik eto tell his boss what you think of that, write to President Avishay Braverman at avishay@bgumail.bgu.ac.il, President of Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba 84105 Israel.
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Posted
6/08/2005 10:56:00 AM
1. When will the Others follow the Farleigh Dickinson Lead? As you know, there is just not enough representation for the Nazi Party and Holocaust Deniers on American college campuses, or at least that used to be the story at Farleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey. The ranks of academic stormtrooper, which include such great minds as Arthur Butz from Northwestern University and Norman Finkelstein from DePaul University, have recently lost a member: Jacques Pluss. Farleigh Dickinson has come to its senses, although Farleigh late. Pluss, like Butz and Finkelstein, is a Chicago Holocaust Denier and anti-Semite. What is it about that town? Farleigh D likes to call itself the Harvard on teh Hackensack. The Weekly Standard called the affair "Springtime for Farleigh Dickinson". I doubt even Mel Brooks could give the story justice. Pluss was dismissed from FDU this past March because university officials learned of his involvement in the National Socialist Movement, which bills itself "America's Nazi Party." School officials insist he was let go for missing too many classes. The 51-year-old "professor" is a white supremacist or racist. He was previously a tenured professor at William Paterson University in Wayne, N.J., from 1984 to 2000. Pluss, who had taught Western Civ at the university since 2002, said he joined the neo-Nazi group in February but kept his views a secret on campus. Just after dismissal, Pluss went on "White Viewpoint," a radio show on the National Socialist Movement Web site. He talked about FDU as a "Jewish plutocratic university" and described the school's men's basketball team as "nigger to the core." "They (the players) have absolutely no right to be in that classroom because they do not possess either the merit or the enhanced intelligence to be there," Pluss said on the show. Pluss said he joined the National Socialist Movement because he "was looking for alternative political parties that presented what I thought were more solid and sensible plans for the common good of America." The group, whose members wear Nazi regalia at its meetings, sometimes has joint meetings with the Ku Klux Klan. Pluss called Fairleigh Dickinson a .heavily Judaized institution. that had taken .the typical Jewish, lawyerly, Hebrew line. in dismissing him. The "Stormfront" nazi web site was offended by his dismissal. Pluss, who received a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, is being paid through this semester. Adjunct professors at the school generally make between $1,500 and $3,000 per course. As Lowell Ponte notes, sauce for the nazi does not seem to sauce for the moonbat. Why are the Ward Churchills, Joseph Massads, Sami al-Arians and Lisa Hajjars not similarly expelled from the institutions in which they promote totalitarian extremist and pro-terror agendas? 2. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18330 Some of My Best Friends Are Anti-Semites! By Julia Gorin FrontPageMagazine.com | June 8, 2005 Last month, the small pond of Ithaca, NY swelled into a storm of controversy when a Mother.s Day piece appeared in the Ithaca Journal, describing one mother.s .growing sense of inner peace and well-being. that has made her a .more open, kind, loving and patient. parent after eschewing the kind of victimhood mentality that pervades the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: .On the global scale, for example, Zionist Jews in Israel have occupied Palestinian land in the name of God and victimhood. If anyone criticizes Israel for their terrorist attacks and slaughter of the Palestinians, they are immediately labeled "anti-Semitic" and guilt-inflicted for the Holocaust without any regard for Palestinian suffering.. The article was written by a yoga instructor named Sandy Wold, who runs a business called .Healing the Goddess. and is part of a larger .New Age Goddess. movement that includes a queen goddess named Starhawk who, according to an Honest Reporting dispatch, writes books on .earth-based spirituality,. and regularly attacks Israel for its .racist policies. and .apartheid wall.. Yet the controversy that these self-actualized women have aroused seems overblown. After all, Ms. Wold and Starhawk are not the first people to find inner peace and well-being by siding with Palestinians over Israelis. In fact, for my own well-being, rather than empathize with an imperfect society, I too have found a way to sympathize with a murderous one. One can look at it this way, for example: We all know what it.s like having that annoying, do-gooder neighbor who.s always trying to be friends, always giving us stuff--in this case water, electricity, jobs, roads, housing--and forgiving us no matter how we mistreat and provoke him. Really, Jews are like Ned Flanders from The Simpsons; no wonder everyone wants to ring their necks! So I.ve adopted the approach of the enlightened classes--the diplomats, the media, the literati and the Europeans--wherein I shrug off par-for-the-course bombings of Israeli civilians but loudly condemn targeted assassinations of terror organizers that result in even a single Palestinian civilian death. It.s a way of saying, .Wink-wink, do you see how indignant I am over the loss of Arab life? Please remember that the next time you.re scouting for bombing targets closer to here.leave me and mine out of it, okay?. The goddesses have inspired me to reflect, and I marvel that I was once a Jew who, as Wold describes, labeled as anti-Semitic those who simply object to the Israeli policy of existing. First of all, being anti-Israel and being anti-Semitic aren.t synonymous: I.m sure there are plenty of people who agree with Israeli policies even while not particularly liking Jews. But more importantly, I.ve come to understand why the Palestinian who lived through the indignity of being asked to open his violin case at an Israeli checkpoint last year made international headlines (though indeed a guitar was used in the 2001 Jerusalem Sbarro attack) and why the story was embellished to look as if the violinist were asked to play for the soldiers. amusement; I also understand why Palestinians had to dig up old graves to show massacre in Jenin, and why everyone pointed to a corner-rounding magic Israeli bullet killing the crouching 12 year-old Mohammed al-Durra in 2000 crossfire, tragically before he ever got the chance to take 20 Jews with him as a shahid (though subsequent investigations indicate only Palestinian gunfire could have gotten to him); and finally, I understand why in 1999 Suha Arafat accused Israelis of poisoning Palestinian water. The hope is that if Israeli .genocide. of Palestinians (or .terrorist attacks and slaughter. as Ms. Wold terms it) is cited often enough, it will bring international peacekeepers in to tie Israel.s hands and be at the mercy of the world. Why else would everyone get so angry when two or three Palestinian civilians are killed in the course of military responses to massacres? It.s the agonizingly slow pace of this genocide! The displaced Arabs started out with 400,000; they screamed genocide and became four million. This is what happens when you leave genocide up to Jews. Anyway, it.s the only rational explanation I can think of for why anti-Israel rhetoric has increased .in direct proportion to the growing toll of Jewish casualties from Arab terrorism,. as commentator Dennis Prager points out. Still on probation for the Holocaust, the Europeans can only cheer the Arab world on from the sidelines, plus contribute what they can through UN programs like the Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which employs and transports Hamas members and explosives. Understandably, the Israeli breed of Jew has confounded the world. (Jews fighting back? What.s gotten into them? Their behavior was so much more palatable in WWII. Why do they refuse to jump into the Red Sea? Maybe it.ll part for them again!) It used to be: "Jews, go to Palestine!" Now it.s: "Jews, get out of Palestine!" I have faith, though, that the world is committed to the Holocaust .never again. happening to the Jews. (I suppose not leaving any Jews for it to happen to again is one way to go about it.) To stay true to the promise, though, something will have to be done about the anti-Jewish climate at our universities. It.s time to introduce courses on tolerating people, and perhaps a course on tolerating Jews. For starters, they can explain why Jews getting preferential admission into Israel is .racism,. but blacks getting preferential admission to universities is .affirmative action.. Then again, the most constructive thing, as Ms. Wold advises, is for each of us to do .our inner work to resolve our inner turmoil. and stop the .fighting, arguing, advising, debating, protesting, blaming and name-calling,. so that .each of our truths will help us co-evolve exponentially, and.solutions to complex issues and world peace will come,. accelerating the planet.s .pure thought-form around peace that harmonizes.everyone on neighboring islands and neighboring countries.the .Hundredth Monkey. phenomenon.. To that end, I have begun to confront my own .biases, opinions and judgments,. and have come to accept that I suffer from what can only be Islamophobia. Because on practically a daily basis, I imagine there are news reports detailing horrors all over the world--car bombings, suicide bombings, even air planes crashing into buildings--and in every case, Muslims are the ones executing these acts. Isn.t that awful of me? Charting a path to my own self-actualization, then, I placed myself into therapy, knowing that the problem must be inside myself and that if I just heal my own mind, all these horrors will stop and peace will prevail. I am now also open to the possibility that Palestinians aren.t responsible for exploding Jews at all. Just look at the disparity between these two Reuters headlines: .Israel Kills Three Militants. vs. .Bus Blows Up in Central Jerusalem.. In other words, the Jews are suffering too, but apparently what they suffer from is spontaneous combustion. Yes, I.m quite sure now that it.s all just been my imagination all along. Thanks to the lucidity of the goddesses, I now see that even if massacres from Bali to Beslan to Madrid were indeed wrought by Muslims, somehow, in a departure from this worldwide pattern, on the one singular, exceptional sliver of land that happens to be dominated by Jews (who wouldn.t have even fit onto it had they not been so skinny coming off the Holocaust), it.s not Muslims who are the culprits, but the Jews themselves. (That.s why what you.re really worried about when boarding an airplane is a Hasid getting on too.) So what we have is the following scenario: Jews get bombed by Muslims, and it.s Israel.s fault; Muslims fly airplanes into American buildings, and it.s Israel.s fault (because of our pro-Israel policies.and someone should feel guilty since Muslims don.t); and finally, Lebanese Christians kill Lebanese Muslims in Shatilla, and it.s Israel.s fault. Once you understand this, the world becomes so much less overwhelming, and you can deal with just about anything. You.ll even know the first thing to ascertain should aliens descend on the earth and start eating people: What did Israel do now? My computer-programmer husband is actually developing software that will calculate the percentage of Jewish responsibility for everything that happens in the world, so soon we won.t have to do any thinking at all. In my current self-transforming work to count myself among the .authentically peaceful, loving, non-reactive, and nonjudgmental. so that, as Ms. Wold suggests, .the human vibration and potential rises,. simultaneously raising global consciousness, promoting healing for all, and evolving humanity so that we might avert .global catastrophe,. I have learned that the most important thing to keep sight of is that Jews and Palestinians aren.t so different, and it.s our similarities that we should focus on. For example, a proud Jewish mother says, .So my son the doctor.. And a proud Palestinian mother says, .So my son the suicide bomber.. (Indeed, the best gift a Palestinian kid can give on Mother.s Day is martyrdom, which has bought moms new apartments, jewelry and social status.) Similarly, a Jewish father has a conversation with his son about his future: .Ok, kid, it.s time to start thinking about making a living!. And a Palestinian father: .Ok, kid, it.s time to start thinking about making a killing!. The resemblance is so great, who can deny we.re cousins? And who can accuse Israelis and other Jews of .hating. Arabs? Hate them? We worship them! How many Jewish sacrifices we.ve laid at the altar of Islam.a thousand offerings to appease our Muslim gods. And with the Gaza withdrawal this year, Jew will turn against Jew and spill more blood. Is this not love? After international pressure does finally push the Israelis into the sea, though, I just hope no one is disillusioned to see suicide bombers swimming after them to carry out their mitzvah before the Jews can drown. (If the Jews left Israel and moved to Mars, the Palestinians would develop a space program before a constitution.) And that.s because if Palestinians woke up one morning without an excuse to kill a Jew, there.d be no reason to get out of bed. It is said the Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Well, if it doesn.t involve an opportunity to kill Jews, what.s the point? What else are these largest per-capita recipients of international aid going to do with their money and aggression? Open a business? If they lose a grip on their hate, they.ll have a massive identity crisis, and suicide bombers will become actually suicidal. To wit, Mideast expert Daniel Pipes cites a Palestinian Christian, who declared that when there.s a Palestinian state, "the sacred union against the Zionist enemy will die. It will be time to settle accounts.It saddens me to say so, but Israeli laws protect us." (Let.s hope that the man who betrayed his people with such candor has since been arrested.) But if what he says is true, it means President Bush had it right in his September address to the UN, when he said, .Peace will not be achieved by Palestinian rulers who intimidate opposition, tolerate corruption, and maintain ties to terrorist groups. The longsuffering Palestinian people deserve true leaders capable of creating and governing a free and peaceful Palestinian state.[in the form of a] stable democracy.. They deserve leaders like, well, the Israelis. Just look at the West Bank fence that humiliates Palestinians by helping stop over 100 planned attacks on Israelis a month, according to embassy numbers--an essential step toward Palestinian statehood. The apartheid wall could single-handedly impose the Palestinian dream of self-determination on the Palestinians. Such that at the next Olympics we might be able to cheer athletes from an actual Palestinian nation, and perhaps even see brick-throwing and belt-bombing become official Olympic sports. (Rival martyr factions already compare their competition to a British soccer league.) Thus striving toward a more just world, Western society will expand its spirit of equity so that soon, as we stroll along New York.s Yitzhak Rabin Way, we can look for a matching Yassir Arafat Square. And Holocaust education in schools will become more fair and objective: To little Schlomo, Hitler may seem like a villain, but little Qudsia may see things differently. (This will mean taking a page from our friends in Europe where, as the 700 Club informs us, Muslim students cheer at the mention of the Holocaust.) Ms. Wold wrote to Honest Reporting apologizing for the .lack of sensitivity to and inclusiveness of your group's perspective and experience,. but there was no need. After all, a goddess can.t be wrong! She should just think of it as a growth experience. At least now she knows that her relationship with those .many Jewish friends. who .know a lot more. about the conflict than she does has been utterly meaningless. Besides, who.s judging? Today.s anti-Semites-slash-anti-.Zionists. are out and they.re proud. (Not that there.s anything wrong with that.why, some of my best friends are anti-Semites!) In fact, these days even regular folks have started to repeat ideas and phrases from the likes of Mahathir Mohamad, the recently retired Malaysian prime minister who said that Jews rule the world by proxy and own newspapers, and suggested that Muslims fight the Jews using brains and not just bombs. I must admit, it was sort of neat hearing this stuff come out of someone of Mongoloid stock; you don.t see that every day. It.s all about diversity, folks, give everyone a chance! (Incidentally, it.s a big lie that there.s no freedom of speech in the Muslim world: Anyone can go over there and with virtually no consequences announce that Jews suck; here it.s not so easy--as the goddesses have learned.) May the world forgive this brash display of my inordinate Jewish influence, but I thought it would actually seem rather tame, considering that I spend the rest of my time drinking the blood of Arab teenagers. At least my therapy is teaching me to be less defensive. After all, it worked so well in the 1930s. 3. New Jew Old Jew: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18327 4. Brita: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18341 5. Peace Partners in California: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,158880,00.html 6. Amnesty's Nonsense: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18329 7. Harvard sucks up to Left: http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon_06_03_05hm.html 8. The Pelosi Factor: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=14969 9. Nice web site: http://dissectleft.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Posted
6/07/2005 10:49:00 AM
1. The Jihadnik Prof at UC-Santa Barbara By Steven Plaut FrontPageMagazine.com | June 7, 2005 (for clean copy with links, go to http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18236)
Lisa Hajjar has made an entire academic career out of bashing the United States and Israel for their supposed use of .torture. against Arabs. She spouts off these baseless accusations from her academic home at the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB), where she teaches in its .Law and Society. program. In fact she has no credentials at all in law. (She also teaches .Middle East Studies. at UCSB, with even fewer qualifications in that field.) Instead she holds a PhD in sociology from American University. The one in Washington, not Cairo. Hajjar is among the shrillest voices in the United States trying to chant the accusations over American .abuses of the human rights. of the al-Qaeda terrorists in Guantanamo Bay. She served on the pretentious .world tribunal,. the one that found Saddam.s Iraq innocent and the US guilty of war crimes and human rights abuses. Among the .tribunal.s. objective findings were that .the occupation of Palestine, Afghanistan and all other colonized areas is illegal and should be brought to an end immediately.. Lisa Hajjar has written: .There is no reason to doubt that torture has been systemic and pervasive, or that authorization can be traced up the chain of command, or that this has seriously damaged not only the immediate victims but also our national institutions and America's image abroad. Yet top officials in the Bush Administration are still doing what torturing regimes do: denying the facts and blaming "rogue" officers. Despite the abundant evidence of torture, Congress refuses to challenge these denial tactics in any meaningful way, for example by refusing to confirm for high office those responsible. What we desperately need is public acknowledgment that torture is always and everywhere a crime, and an official policy that reflects this conviction.. Hajjar has tried to define herself academically as a scholar having some expertise on the use of torture. She defines her aim as the debunking the false .popular belief that Western history constitutes a progressive move from more to less torture.. The fact that she publishes her .findings. on web sites of the communist party raises questions about her credibility and objectivity. Hajjar gets her kicks out of issuing .warnings. about human rights abuses. She has spent her energies bemoaning the .torture. of the Iraqi Ba.athists being held in the Abu Ghraib prison. Lisa Hajjar is apparently the daughter of a Finnish mother and a father of Syrian descent. She teaches in the .Law and Society Program. at the University of California at Santa Barbara, but she is in fact nothing more than a third-rate leftist sociologist. She has no training in law or legal studies, is not qualified as a Middle East scholar or researcher, and his extraordinarily few bona fide publications even in sociology. None of this prevented UCSB from granting her tenure as well as its .Pious Award. for her .research.. She was among the UCSB faculty members opposing the war against Iraq and defending Saddam as part of .Not in Our Name.. Among the .scholarly articles. Hajjar lists on her vita are many propaganda screeds that she published, including those in the anti-Israel pro-terror .Middle East Report,. for .In these Times., on the MERIP organization.s web page, in the .Amnesty International. magazine, and a partisan defense of Palestinian mass murderer Marwan Barghouti.[1] On her vita, besides the partisan propaganda we could find at most six articles she has published in refereed journals, hardly enough to get a faculty member tenure in any serious academic department. Hajjar is author of a recently-published pseudo-scholarly book, Courting Conflict: The Israeli Military Court System in the West Bank and Gaza, a broadside assault against Israel.s military courts, which often try Palestinian terrorists. Israeli civilian courts do not have jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza Strip for the simple reason that these areas are not formally annexed to Israel, although Palestinian terrorists convicted in military courts may appeal to Israel.s Supreme Court. The book is less an analysis of the military courts than it is a partisan denunciation of Israel.s presence in the .occupied territories. and an open endorsement of the rights of Palestinians to .resist. it, Hajjar.s Newspeak term for mass murdering Jews. (Israelis arresting murdering terrorists would not qualify as .resistance by Jews. in the Hajjar book, of course.) True, Israel itself has debated the circumstances under which .moderate physical pressure. could be applied to captured terrorists to force them to reveal information. But Israel is in a state of war and a fight for its very life against Arab fascism. Indeed years ago even this .moderate pressure. was prohibited by the Israeli court system. The main prisoner abuse of jailed Palestinians in Israel these days seems to be that some of their VCR.s are really difficult to pre-program. In fact, while prohibited in Israel, it is not clear at all why terrorists should NOT be tortured,[2] this on purely ethical grounds. Be that as it may, while conceding that .a history of Israeli interrogation of Palestinians has never been written, and the conditions do not exist for such an undertaking,. Hajjar is willing to take the word of the Bash-Israel lobby that Israel routinely uses torture against Palestinian prisoners. Among the primary sources cited by Hajjar to prove that Israel uses torture are screeds in Tikkun Magazine, the .Palestine Research Center. in Beirut, the late neonazi anti-Semite Israel Shahak, and other far-leftist propagandists. Hajjar.s .book. has been lavishly praised by pro-terror Islamic fundamentalist web sites, and one of her screeds has been cited and praised by a neonazi web site. Before coming to Santa Barbara, Hajjar taught .military law. at Swarthmore. There she engaged in partisan one-sided indoctrination in her classroom, as is revealed by the syllabi of her courses there. Her required reading list was a who.s who of far leftists, communists, and haters of American and Israel. Among her proclamations at Swarthmore, was: .While the United States voices outrage about Saddam Hussein, it goes on tolerating human rights violations and other misdeeds by regional allies.. Her .research. at Swarthmore consisted of little more than serving as a cheerleader for politicized .cause lawyers.. Hajjar has served as editorial assistant and writer at MERIP, a fanatically anti-Israel pro-terror .think tank. in Washington DC. She also is a member of the board of editors (alongside such .scholars. as Columbia University.s Joseph Massad) of the pseudo-academic Journal of Palestine Studies, a partisan propaganda journal that features such .scholars. as the PLO chief. The Middle East Quarterly describes the Journal of Palestine Studies as a .PLO propaganda organ disguised as an academic journal; for example, it routinely refers to the creation of Israel as an-Nakba (.catastrophe. in Arabic).. Orbis, Fall 1988, p. 637, describes the Institute of Palestine Studies, publisher of the Journal of Palestine Studies, as "an arm of the Palestine Liberation Organization." Stanford.s Joel Beinin publishes his anti-Israel propaganda pieces there, as do the usual Israeli far-Left anti-Semites favoring the destruction of their own country. The .journal. makes little attempt to hide its political agenda. Hajjar does not hide her support for Palestinian violence. She writes: .Because Palestinians are stateless and dispersed, their struggle for national rights has taken .unconventional. forms, including guerilla warfare. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which emerged in the 1960s to lead this struggle, has been castigated by Israel, and to a lesser extent the US, as nothing but a terrorist organization. This typifies the use of the terrorist label to non-states in their struggles against states.. Since most Palestinians have identified politically with the PLO, it was easy for the Israeli state to relate the repression of Palestinians to the imperatives of Jewish/Israeli national security. Generally speaking, everything connected to Palestinian nationalist activities and especially to the PLO was considered a security threat which (sic) could justify limitations and restrictions of rights.. Those .unconventional. Palestinian forms of protest happen to include blowing up buses full of school children and pregnant mothers. Hajjar is a radical feminist, but one with little real interest in the position of women in the Arab world and with no concern at all over Israeli women being murdered by her beloved Palestinian terrorists. She has mentioned that in Morocco things are less equitable than at Vassar. She seems to believe that the main cause for Arab feminists should be destroying Israel. She is highly praised by Neve Gordon, a fanatic anti-Israel lecturer in political science at Ben Gurion University in Israel, someone who was arrested for serving as a .human shield. for Palestinian murderers, and someone who wrote a sycophantic piece about Holocaust Denier Norman Finkelstein, comparing Finkelstein ethically to the Prophets in the Bible. Gordon and Hajjar like to cite one another as authoritative sources for the claim that Israel uses torture against Arab prisoners. This is a bit like Ward Churchill and Noam Chomsky citing one another.s works to prove how that America is more oppressive than Nazi Germany. At least five of Hajjar.s articles are featured on a PLO web site. Together with Steve Niva, a pro-terrorism far-leftist faculty member at Evergreen State College in Washington State (from which Rachel Corrie was dispatched to go commit suicide on behalf of Palestinian terrorism in Gaza) and a Counterpunch columnist, she is a sycophantic groupie of Edward Said and described his book as .a seminal event, causing lasting reverberations throughout the academy."[3] Hajjar also writes for .The Nation., where she openly endorses nutty conspiracy theories. She writes inter alia: .While neoconservatism may help explain much about American military and foreign policy after 9/11, it doesn't account for the legal reasoning that set the conditions for the torture scandal. For that, we need to look to the Federalist Society, an organization established by right-wing lawyers in the early 1980s to redress .liberal bias. in American law schools and the legal profession. The thinking and influence of Federalist Society types who dominate legal positions (and judicial appointments) in the Bush Administration are laid bare in the torture memos, which document the triumph of international law-averse officials in the Justice Department, the Pentagon and the White House over dissenting voices in the State Department and sectors of the professional military.. She has tried to build much of her academic credentials upon her .research. concerning the uses of torture. She insists torture is used widely by both the US and Israel and her evidence for this is that some Arabs claim this is so, as do some far-left propagandists such as Kenneth Roth from .Human Rights Watch.. In fact, HRW has been exposed by NGO-Monitor as constituting little more than an anti-Israel smear lobby and is hardly a credible source. Other .sources. for her claims concerning torture include the extremist anti-Israel leftist organization in Israel, Betselem, which denies that Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorism at all - other than by surrendering to terrorist demands, and which has been repeatedly caught lying. She teaches her views to hapless UCSB freshmen in a formal course about .torture.. Hajjar regularly attacks Alan Dershowitz savagely for daring to suggest that under certain circumstances torturing terrorists might be justified. She compares American and Israeli officials to the nazis tried in Nuremberg. Lisa Hajjar may be at her most dishonest when she is co-authoring political propaganda together with Stanford University professor of history Joel Beinin. In Alyssa A. Lappen.s words, Beinin .denounces American .imperialism. on Al-Jazeera Television. A former Zionist, he refers to jihadist suicide bombers as .martyrs.. He praised Mideast scholars for ignoring the issue of terrorism, and he regularly repeats the most twisted and paranoid claims of Islamist regimes as though they were historical fact.. Beinin used to be the ayatollah of the notoiously-biased .Middle East Studies Association,. an anti-American and anti-Israel propaganda outfit disguised as an academic professional association. (Hajjar has chaired sessions at MESA events.) Beinin religiously churns out propaganda, with Hajjar is his regular sidekick. Indeed, Beinin proudly lists these propaganda screeds on his personal web page. Beinin and Hajjar were among the professors signing a statement before the Allied invasion of Iraq, warning that Israel was planning to conduct genocidal atrocities against Arabs the moment the US troops landed in Mesopotamia. Well, Saddam was long ago toppled, with not even a smidgen of an atrocity was performed by Israel, while not even a whisper of an apology has come from either Beinin or Hajjar. Orwellistically, the two continue to collaborate in conferences devoted to .New History., which is to say . pseudo-history. Hajjar is a co-author and collaborator with Beinin in a number of projects, including "Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer." It is widely reprinted, including on anti-Israel pro-terror web sites such as .From Occupied Palestine,. and also on those that are fronts for the PLO. The .Primer. is a rather typical example of getting just about everything possible wrong. It begins with the proclamation that religion plays no role in the Arab war against Israel and that it is all a "struggle over land". Now one of the few things unchallengeable about the Middle East conflict is that it has virtually nothing to do with land. Arab countries already control 6,145,389 square miles of land. That is almost twice the land area of the United States, which is 3,537,438 square miles, and about the same as the land area of Russia. Israel, even when including all of the "occupied territories" retained from 1967, controls less than 10,000 square miles. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip comprise about 2300 square miles (a bit less when deducting Jerusalem and its suburbs from the account), which is about half the size of the Everglades. Beinin and Hajjar want us to believe that with 6,145,389 square miles, the Arabs want war and genocide, but with 6,145,389 plus 2300 more, then they will want peace. If Israel only trades .land for peace. with the land-deprived Arabs, and never mind that its abandonment of the West Bank would leave an Israel ten miles wide and waiting for the Arab armies to annihilate, then all will be well. Hajjar and Beinin want the world to believe that the entire Middle East war is due to the fact that those evil selfish Jews are unwilling to share their 10,000 square miles with the poor land-starved Arabs. But, in reality, the obvious true cause of the Middle East war is the fact that the Arab world is unwilling to allow the Jews to control even a sixth of one percent of the territory of the Middle East. The Arabs, controlling more land than any other ethnic group on the planet besides the Russians (most of whose land is frozen tundra), are simply unwilling to share even the tiniest sliver of the Middle East with the Jews. In the .Primer. Beinin and Hajjar get most of the rest of their political history wrong as well. They claim that religious Zionism developed after the Six-Day War, whereas it developed in the nineteenth century. They claim that the Six Day War triggered messianic religiosity among Israelis, whereas the evidence suggests Israelis became more secularist after 1967 than they were before. Beinin and Hajjar also reveal their biases by what they do NOT report, such as the mass immigration into "Palestine" of Arabs from neighboring countries starting in the late nineteenth century, and their counting of all Moslems, including Turks, as "Palestinian Arabs." They write, "In 1920 and 1921, clashes broke out between Arabs and Jews in which roughly equal numbers of both groups were killed." This makes it sound like Jews and Arabs were equally involved in murder. In fact, the Jewish dead were murdered by Arab pogromchiki whereas the Arab dead were rioters shot by British troops. When Arabs started mass-murdering Jews in 1929, Beinin and Hajjar blame the Jews, for raising a flag near the Wailing Wall. They then write: "In 1921, the British divided this region in two: east of the Jordan River became the Emirate of Transjordan, to be ruled by Faysal's brother 'Abdullah,. and west of the Jordan River became the Palestine Mandate. This was the first time in modern history that Palestine became a unified political entity (emphasis added)." In fact, of course, it was clearly a division of Palestine into an Arab two-thirds and a remaining third earmarked for Jews. The Beinin-Hajjar version of the creation of the "Palestinian" refugee problem is nothing more and nothing less than the Arab version. Those horrid Jews expelled the poor innocent Arab victims! In fact, the Arab refugees fled at the direction of their commanders and to escape the battle zones created when the Arab fascist states invaded Israel and tried to annex all the lands of Western Palestine.[4] Beinin and Hajjar also repeat the now-discredited myth about how Arab civilians in Deir Yassin were "massacred" by Jews. Beinin and Hajjar then recite the lies about supposed discrimination by Israel against Israeli Arabs: "But in many respects they were and remain second-class citizens, since Israel defines itself as the state of the Jewish people and Palestinians are non-Jews." France is a French state, Greece is a Greek state, England is an English state. Being in the minority is synonymous with being a second-class citizen in the "minds" of Beinin and Hajjar, but only in Israel. (If anything, Israel discriminates in FAVOR of its Arab citizens and against Jews!!) Not a word in their screed on the status of ethnic and religious minorities in the rest of the Middle East. They go on: "About 40 percent of their (Arab) lands were confiscated by the state and used for development projects that benefited Jews primarily or exclusively." I guess the Left-Coast Duo assume that Arabs do not use the roads, universities, hospitals and parks in Israel on public lands. The Beinin-Hajjar account of supposed abuses of Arabs by Israel is as undocumented and baseless as it is unscholarly. They write, "Torture of Palestinian prisoners has been a common practice since at least 1971, and dozens of people have died in detention from abuse or neglect." Their evidence is that they think so. This is all complete falsehood and propaganda dressed up as "research". They add, "According to Israel, Palestinian terrorism includes all forms of opposition to the occupation (including non-violence)." According to Israel? According to Beinin and Hajjar, all forms of Arab atrocities against Jews are "protests against occupation., whereas no form of anti-terror operations by Israel could possibly be considered justifiable self-defense. The Beinin-Hajjar take on the "Oslo Accords" is that "the PLO accepted this deeply flawed agreement with Israel because it was weak and had little diplomatic support in the Arab world." They have got to be kidding! Beinin and Hajjar do not think the Oslo Accords were .deeply flawed. because they produced 1700 Israelis murdered by the PLO after it foreswore all use of violence forever, but rather because they failed to deliver Israel.s annihilation. We now of course know that the PLO "accepted" the Oslo deal only in order to get control of the West Bank and Gaza and use them as terrorist bases to attack Israel. The PLO had no intention of abandoning terror and murder, nor its ambitions to seek Israel.s annihilation. No mention at all from Beinin and Hajjar about how the PLO violated each and every clause in the Oslo Accord almost from the instant it was signed. Beinin and Hajjar are at their most disengenuous and "revisionist", which is to say . dishonest, when they tell the saga of the failed "Camp David II. conference: "Although Barak offered a far more extensive Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank than any other Israeli leader had publicly considered, he insisted on maintaining Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem. This was unacceptable to the Palestinians and to most of the Muslim world." Actually, Barak there offered Arafat not only East Jerusalem but control of the Old City of Jerusalem as well, including its Jewish shrines. Arafat turned Barak down because the deal did not provide for the immediate annihilation of Israel (also known as the .right of return.), which is really the PLO.s minimal demand. Then there are the innuendoes and falsehoods by the Left-Coast Duo when it comes to recent years in the Middle East. They write: "The Israeli military response escalated dramatically after two soldiers, allegedly 'lost' in the PA-controlled West Bank town of Ramallah, were killed October 12 by a Palestinian mob returning from the funeral of an unarmed young man whom soldiers had shot dead the day before." Note how the use of the quote marks around the word "lost" and the absence of quotes around the word .unarmed. convey to the reader the totally-false impression that the two were involved in something nefarious. In fact, the two Jewish victims were innocents, who were tortured and murdered in cold blood, and then their bodies were mutilated. Ultimately Hajjar lets her pseudo-scholarship and imagination fabricate the contents of her .research.. She claims her own phone was tapped after the 9-11 attacks. Hajjar is convinced that torturing Arabs is ingrained in the American soul. She is as fond of whining about make-pretend .right-wing conspiracies. as is Hillary Clinton. Just before the toppling of Saddam, Hajjar endorsed warnings that .senior (US) officials could face prosecutions for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide if the war unfolds as reportedly planned,. and claimed Bush was planning to nuke Iraq. This sociologist with no legal training at all insists she has the right to pass legal judgment upon the United States: .the Bush administration has articulated positions and pursued policies that blatantly contravene the Geneva Conventions.. We have no doubt that her Stanford sidekick Joel Beinin agrees. Notes: [1] The Making of a Political Trial: The Marwan Barghouti Case. Middle East Report, no. 225 (Winter 2002). [2] Alan Dershowitz, "Is It Necessary to Apply `Physical Pressure' to Terrorists--and to Lie about It?" Israel Law Review 23/2-3 (1989). [3] Lisa Hajjar and Steve Niva, "(Re)Made in the USA: Middle East Studies in the Global Era," Middle East Report 7, no. 4 (October.December 1997), pp. 4.5. [4] Efraim Karsh, .Were the Palestinians Expelled?. Commentary Magazine, July-August 2000 and Efraim Karsh, .The Palestinians and the .Right of Return,.. Commentary Magazine, May 2001. 2. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/university-of-kentuckys-prof-in-drag.html The University of Kentucky's Prof in Drag by Steven Plaut The web newsletter "Inside Higher Education" reports yet another tale of neoconservative oppression of the rights of moonbat faculty members. It seems that the the University of Kentucky and Georgetown College are unhappy with sociology adjunct professor Jeremy D. Kerr, who now teaches a course on "gender and society" at the University of Kentucky. You see, Prof. Jeremy likes to teach his class in drag. You can see him in his work clothes here. Kerr also teaches a required sociology course that UKY students in sociology are coerced into taking. Kerr requires his students to write essays on the benefits of hemp. You will be happy to hear that the UKY President just renewed his contract. Kerr has been told by his department chair at Kentucky to stop cross-dressing in class, and Kerr has also sued Georgetown, charging that he lost an adjunct position there because of his cross-dressing in area restaurants. Kerr finished his Ph.D. at Kentucky in the spring and has been working there as an adjunct. Kerr has also taken his cross-dressing to area restaurants and reportedly has been thrown out of some of them for appearing in women.s clothing. Kerr.s lawsuit against Georgetown College says that these incidents led the college not to renew his contract there, according to an article in The Lexington Herald-Leader. .I.m turning it around. What.s good for the girls is good for the guys,. he said. His lawsuit against Georgetown charges it with sex discrimination for not renewing his contract. I, for one, would sure like to hear his rendition of "I'm just a Coal Miner's Daughter." 3. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/massachusetts-rainbats.html Massachusetts Rainbats by Steven Plaut The so-called Massachusetts "Green-Rainbow" Party is a group of mega-moonbats in the state that gave us Teddy Kennedy and Mikey Dukakis. It holds conventions, possibly on a Boston Common park bench that can hold all of its members. It is run by a Moonbat named Mel King, who teaches "urban studies" as an adjunct at MIT and whose main academic contribution to humankind was a ranting piece called "The Power of Love in Research Planning and Education" . This year its "convention" decided to pick up where the British Assocition of University Teachers failed. As you recall, some anti-Israel jihadniks first managed to slip through a "resolution to boycott Israel at the AUT conventrion while the sane members were off having a Guinness, but when they returned they overturned it. The "Green Rainbow" Rainbats just passed a resolution denouncing Israel as an "apartheid state," evidently because it is the only country in the Middle East that is NOT an apartheid state, and call for sanctions against Israel and support for Palestinian terrorism. They also denounce "US Imperialism in Sudan" (really! I am not inventing this!), and demand an end to the "occupation" of Iraq. The convention was held in occupied Massachusetts. We figure both of the members of the Rainbow Green Party endorsed the resolution. 4. Conspiracy Nuts: http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/scientific-american-takes-on.html 5. Hizonnah's Moonbat Friends: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0605/dunetz_bloomberg.php3 6. I got a kick out of this. There is a new treasonous moonbat web page named http://israelpalestineforum.com/ that features, among other things, a special page on hot web deals for hotels and travel in Palestbie. But when you open it, all the deals are for Palestine, Texas! 7. Intifada Chic: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/584924.html 8. Disengagement or Suicide? http://www.worldjewishnewsagency.org/muslim_sensitivity.htm
Monday, June 06, 2005
Posted
6/06/2005 10:54:00 AM
1. Don't miss this Vietnam Vet memorial site for Jane Fonda: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=14910 2. Please add to your regular web reading sites - this: http://www.worldjewishnewsagency.org/ 3. U.S. BLAMED FOR KORAN HARM IN 9/11 WTC COLLAPSE KABUL -- Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan rioted today in response to new reports that copies of the Koran were desecrated when two American buildings collapsed after being struck by American airplanes in September of 2001. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) revealed that fragments of the burned and soiled Korans were discovered in the ruins of the World Trade Center towers in New York City. A spokesman for the ACLU said the Bush administration did little to prevent the damage to the Islamic holy books, that apparently belonged to Muslims who worked in the office towers until their "unjustified termination" during the morning of September 11, 2001. "This is just another example of U.S. insensitivity to cultural diversity," said the unnamed ACLU spokesman. "To add insult to injury, anonymous sources say that some of the Koran fragments may have been unceremoniously dumped in a landfill." -- Scott Ott, courtesy Scrappleface, Copyright 2005 Scrappleface. All rights reserved. 4. The father of Daniel Pearl speaks out: http://www.thejewishweek.com/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4194 Condemn Anti-Zionism As Racism Judea Pearl In the past two months I have visited four .troubled. campuses . Duke, York (Canada), Columbia and the University of California Irvine . where tensions between Jewish and anti-Zionist students and professors have attracted national media attention. In these visits I have spoken to students, faculty and administrators, and I have obtained a fairly gloomy picture of the situation on those and other campuses. First, Jewish students have been subjected in the past few years to an unprecedented assault on their identity as Jews. And we, the Jewish faculty on campus, have let down those students. We have failed to equip them with effective tools to fight back this assault. I would like to propose a remedy. Many condemn anti-Zionism for being a flimsy cover for anti-Semitism. I disagree. The order is wrong. I condemn anti-Semitism for being an instrument for a worse form of racism: anti-Zionism. In other words, I submit that anti-Zionism is a form of racism more dangerous than classical anti-Semitism. Labeling and fighting anti-Zionism as racism is precisely the weapon that our students need for survival on campus. Anti-Zionism earns its racist character from denying the Jewish people what it grants to other collectives (e.g. Spanish, Palestinians): namely, the right to nationhood and self-determination. Are Jews a nation? A collective is entitled to nationhood when its members identify with a common history and wish to share a common destiny. Palestinians have earned nationhood status by virtue of thinking like a nation, not by residing where their ancestors did (many of them are only three or four generations in Palestine). Jews, likewise, are bonded by nationhood (i.e., common history and destiny) more than they are bonded by religion. The appeal to Jewish nationhood is necessary when we consider Israel.s insistence on remaining a .Jewish state.. By .Jewish state, Israelis mean of course .national-Jewish state,. not .religious-Jewish state,. since theocratic states (like Pakistan and Iran) are incompatible with modern standards of democracy and pluralism. Anti-Zionist racists use this anti-theocracy argument again and again to de-legitimize Israel, and I have found our students unable to defend their position with conventional ideology that views Jewishness as a religion. Jewishness is more than just a religion. It is an intricate and intertwined mixture of ancestry, religion, history, country, culture, tradition, attitude, nationhood and ethnicity, and we need not apologize for not fitting neatly into the standard molds of textbook taxonomies . we did not choose our painful history. As a form of racism, anti-Zionism is worse that anti-Semitism. It targets the most vulnerable part of the Jewish people, namely the people of Israel, who rely on the sovereignty of Israel for physical safety, national identity and personal dignity. To put it more bluntly, anti-Zionism condemns 5 million human beings, mostly refugees or children of refugees, to eternal statelessness, traumatized by historical images of persecution and genocide. Anti-Zionism also attacks the pivotal component of our identity, the glue that bonds us together . our nationhood and the right for self-determination. And while people of conscience reject anti-Semitism, anti-Zionist rhetoric has become a mark of academic sophistication and social acceptance in Europe and on some U.S. campuses. Moreover, anti-Zionism disguises itself in the cloak of political debate, exempt from sensitivities and rules of civility that govern interreligious discourse. Religion is ferociously protected in our society; political views are not. So in the name of .open political debate,. administrators would not think twice about inviting MIT linguist Noam Chomsky to speak on campus, though his anti-Zionist utterances offend the fabric of my Jewish identity deeper than any of the ugly religious insults currently shocking the media. He should be labeled for what he is: a racist. Strategically, while accusations of anti-Semitism are worn out and have lost their punch, charging someone with racism makes people think why anyone would deny people the right of self-determination in a sliver of land in the birthplace of their history. It shifts the frame of discourse from debating Israel.s policies to the root cause of the conflict . denying Israelis their basic rights. Charges of .racism. highlight the inherent asymmetry between the Zionist and anti-Zionist positions. The former grants both Israelis and Palestinians the right for statehood; the latter denies that right to only one side. This asymmetry is the most effective weapon our students should use in campus debates, for it puts them back on the high moral grounds of .fair and balanced. and forces their opponents to defend an ideology of one-sidedness. For example, I have found it effective when confronting an anti-Zionist speaker to ask: .Are you willing to go on record and state that the Israel-Palestine conflict is a conflict between two legitimate national movements?. Western audiences adore even-handedness and abhor bias. The question above forces the racist to defend his uneven treatment of the two sides. America prides itself on academic freedom, and academic freedom entails freedom to teach hatred and racism . we graciously accept this fact of life. However, academic freedom also entails the freedom of students to expose racism, be it white supremacy, women inferiority, Islamophobia or Zionophobia, wherever it is spotted. Not to censor, but to expose . racists stew in their own words. In summary, I believe the formula .Anti-Zionism = Racism. should give Jewish students the courage to both defend their identity and expose those who abuse it. n Judea Pearl is a professor of computer science at UCLA and president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation, named after his son. He is co-editor of .I am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl (Jewish Lights, 2004), winner of the National Jewish Book Award. 5. Funding pseudo-diversity: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18306 6. Real Men Moisturize: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18321 7. Teaching Hate at Columbia: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18302 8. The Ward Churchill Saga: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18320 9. Tobin on Corrie: http://jewishworldreview.com/0505/tobin_2005_05_30.php3 10. Gitmo Lies: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin.php3
Sunday, June 05, 2005
Posted
6/05/2005 10:26:00 AM
1. Counterpunch Plays "Spin the Ba'athists" and Outs Pappa Cockburn Ok, we admit it. Counterpunch threw us off and confused us this time. It ran a Robert Fisk column that did NOT blame the US and Israel for a Ba'athist-committed murder! We are used to the Counterpunch critters routinely blaming Israel and the US whenever the Syrian Ba'athists have someone car-bombed or otherwise murdered, and more generally playing "Spin the Ba'athist" for its readers. After all, when Syria murdered Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri in Beirut on February 14, 2005, Counterpunch went out of its gourd to blame the US and Israel for the death! It ran a series of pieces with the same theme, including one by Dartmouth moonbat jihadist Naseer H. Aruri blaming the US for it. Mega-moonbat Manuel Garcia, Jr. agreed. Cockburnite Gary Leupp cleared the Assad regime because - after all - it issued a condemnation of the assassination! More generally, Counterpunch has virtually merged with the Ba'athist Party, running toady pro-Ba'athist articles. Saul Landau and Farrah Hassen defend Syria against American nefarious plotting and also clear the poor Assad regime of the murder of Hariri. Paul Craig Roberts feels the same. Cockburn continues to run as one of his regulars the spokesman for Uruknet, the web site of the Iraqi Ba'athists, nominally based in Italy, the web site for those folks who enjoy lopping off the heads of Western women captured in Fallujah. Uruknet spokesman Kurt Nimmo is an unemployed New Mexico neonazi who may or may not have graduated high school, yet is deemed qualified by Counterpunch to join its team, although not by Walmart. But this week, Robert Fisk spends a whole article on Counterpunch implying (he is too pusillanimous to say so openly) that Syria was behind the car-bomb murder of Lebanese anti-Syrian journalist Samir Kassir a few days ago. This puzzles us. Since when do Counterpunch columnists hold Ba'athists to account for murdering people? Fisk himself was agnostic about who had murdered Hariri. The Kassir bombing was almost identical to that of Hariri, which the Moonbatmosphere blamed on Israel and the US! And besides, we thought that Counterpunch guaranteed its support to ANY regime that attacks the US and Israel! So what gives? Since when does Counterpunch run non-treasonous opinion pieces? Meanwhile, the OTHER Cockburn, Patrick, the brother of Al, writes a column this week in Counterpunch, reporting to us that the British intelligence agency MI5 had the pater of the Counterpunch Cockburns under surveillance during World War II, evidently suspecting he was an enemy agent for Germany, besides being an open communist. In the words of sonny Patrick Cockburn himself, "From the beginning, the (communist) party was a little bewildered by its recruit, though it swiftly recognised his effectiveness. In 1936-37, party officials in London working for the Comintern, supposedly uniting all Communist parties, wrote a series of reports about him to the Moscow leadership. They contained admiring comments. One said: 'He is held to be one of Fleet Street's cleverest journalists.' Another noted his ability to reveal Cabinet changes before they were announced." Let me guess. The Burncocks will now accuse us of "McCarthyism" for running this! http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/counterpunch-plays-spin-baathists-and.html 2. Gerald Steinberg on Temple Mount Cowardice of Israel: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1117851565394&p=1006953079865 3. Barry Chamish just lost in the libel suit filed against him by Kahanist Avigdor Eskin. Chamish had written that Eskin is a Shin Bet agent (Chamish considers just about everyone on earth to be either a Shin Bet or a CFR "agent"). See http://barrychamish.com/html/avigdor_eskin.html Eskin sued in small claims court and won. Chamish this week repeats has accustions that Eskin is a Shin Bet agent at http://barrychamish.com/html/avigdor_eskin2.html , adding a characteristic Chamishism: that the Judge Chaim Lakhovitzky in the small-claims-court case who found against Chamish was corrupt. Chamish maintains the correctness of his original accusation against Eskin because "Eskin did not appear at the trial with a letter from the Shabak denying he was associated with them." As you know, the Shin Bet makes a routine practice of giving such documents to Kahanists. Here is the Chamish version of the verdict: 'The judge, for reasons I'm beginning to more than suspect, dismissed the proven fact that one word in Haaretz reaches hundreds of thousands of Israelis whereas, my claim was read by not a one of my countrymen. I asked the judge an obvious question. "Why is Eskin suing me and not Haaretz or Dahlia Pelosoff-Rabin?" Now get this reply: "Because he didn't want to." I knew the fix was in at that moment.' We sure hope the judge reads those words.
Posted
6/05/2005 09:16:00 AM
ISM Violence and Hooliganism Growing
The Moonbatocracy has turned Rachel Corrie into its pro-terror Mother Terasa and keeps chirping about how the pro-terror International Solidarity Movement that Corrie represented is a little more than a group of pro-peace quietists. In fact they are cheerleaders for and collaborators with Palestinian terror. Frontpage Magazine and DTN have long been revealing the ISM hoodlums for what they are - violent leftwing neofascists, attacking Israeli soldiers and police in order to prevent Israel from erecting a fence that might keep some suicide bombers from mass murdering Jewish children. The ISM (whose name really means "I Support Murderers") wants the mass murderers to carry out their intentions, which is the only real reason that opposes Israel's security fence. The ISM operatives have openly collabored with Palestinian terrorists, hiding weapons and wanted terrorists in their offices. Only Israeli timidity can explian why they have not been locked up and kicked out. But now the ISM's efforts to create for itself a false image of pro-peace gummy bears has ended. The ISM hooligans just poked out the eye of an Israeli soldier over the weekend. Another solider was wounded by an ISM rock. Some pacifists! The press does not reveal if the wounded soldiers were Jews or Bedouins. In the past, the ISM has taken special glee in targeting patriotic Israeli Bedouin soldiers. Meanwhile, we are curious to see if Ariel Sharon remembers what the Bible says about people who poke out eyes. See http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/ism-violence-and-hooliganism-growing.html for clean copy with links.
Friday, June 03, 2005
Posted
6/03/2005 06:57:00 PM
From the WSJ:
J'Accuse. Anti-Semitism at 'Le Monde' and beyond. By Tom Gross The Wall Street Journal Europe June 2, 2005 A French court last week found three writers for Le Monde, as well as the newspaper's publisher, guilty of "racist defamation" against Israel and the Jewish people. In a groundbreaking decision, the Versailles court of appeal ruled that a comment piece published in Le Monde in 2002, "Israel-Palestine: The Cancer," had whipped up anti-Semitic opinion. The writers of the article, Edgar Morin (a well-known sociologist), Daniele Sallenave (a senior lecturer at Nanterre University) and Sami Nair (a member of the European parliament), as well as Le Monde's publisher, Jean-Marie Colombani, were ordered to pay symbolic damages of one euro to a human-rights group and to the Franco-Israeli association. Le Monde was also ordered to publish a condemnation of the article, which it has yet to do. It is encouraging to see a French court rule that anti-Semitism should have no place in the media -- even when it is masked as an analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ruling also makes it clear that the law in this respect applies to extremist Jews (Mr. Morin is Jewish) as much as to non-Jews. Press freedom is a value to be cherished, but not exploited and abused. In general, European countries have strict laws against such abuse and Europe's mainstream media are in any case usually good at exercising self-censorship. Responsible journalists strenuously avoid libelous characterizations of entire ethnic, national or religious groups. They go out of their way, for example, to avoid suggesting that the massacres in Darfur, which are being carried out by Arab militias, in any way represent an Arab trait. The exception to this seems to be the coverage of Jews, particularly Israeli ones. This is particularly ironic given the fact that Europe's relatively strict freedom of speech laws (compared to those in the U.S.) were to a large extend drafted as a reaction to the Continent's Nazi occupation. And yet, from Oslo to Athens, from London to Madrid, it has been virtually open season on them in the last few years, especially in supposedly liberal media. "Israel-Palestine: The Cancer" was a nasty piece of work, replete with lies, slanders and myths about "the chosen people," "the Jenin massacre," describing the Jews as "a contemptuous people taking satisfaction in humiliating others," "imposing their unmerciful rule," and so on. Yet it is was no worse than thousands of other news reports, editorials, commentaries, letters, cartoons and headlines published throughout Europe in recent years, in the guise of legitimate and reasoned discussion of Israeli policies. The libels and distortions about Israel in some British media are by now fairly well known: the Guardian's equation of Israel and al Qaeda; the Evening Standard's equation of Israel and the Taliban; the report by the BBC's Middle East correspondent, Orla Guerin, on how "the Israelis stole Christmas." Most notorious of all is the Independent's Middle East correspondent, Robert Fisk, who specializes in such observations as his comment that, "If ever a sword was thrust into a military alliance of East and West, the Israelis wielded that dagger," and who implies that the White House has fallen into the hands of the Jews: "The Perles and the Wolfowitzes and the Cohens ... [the] very sinister people hovering around Bush." The invective against Israel elsewhere in Europe is less well known. In Spain, for example, on June 4, 2001 (three days after a Palestinian suicide bomber killed 21 young Israelis at a disco, and wounded over 100 others, all in the midst of a unilateral Israeli ceasefire), the liberal daily Cambio 16 published a cartoon of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (with a hook nose he does not have), wearing a skull cap (which he does not usually wear), sporting a swastika inside a star of David on his chest, and proclaiming: "At least Hitler taught me how to invade a country and destroy every living insect." The week before, on May 23, El Pais (the "New York Times of Spain") published a cartoon of an allegorical figure carrying a small rectangular-shaped black moustache, flying through the air toward Sharon's upper lip. The caption read: "Clio, the muse of history, puts Hitler's moustache on Ariel Sharon." Two days later, on May 25, the Catalan daily La Vanguardia published a cartoon showing an imposing building, with a sign outside reading "Museo del Holocausto Judio" (Museum of the Jewish Holocaust), and next to it another building under construction, with a large sign reading "Futuro Museo del Holocausto Palestino" (Future Museum of the Palestinian Holocaust). Greece's largest newspaper, the leftist daily Eleftherotypia, has run several such cartoons. In April 2002, on its front cover, under the title "Holocaust II," an Israeli soldier was depicted as a Nazi officer and a Palestinian civilian as a Jewish death camp inmate. In September 2002, another cartoon in Eleftherotypia showed an Israeli soldier with a Jewish star telling a Nazi officer next to him "Arafat is not a person the Reich can talk to anymore." The Nazi officer responds "Why? Is he a Jew?" In Italy, in October 2001, the Web site of one of the country's most respected newspapers, La Repubblica, published the notorious anti-Semitic forgery, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," in its entirety, without providing any historical explanation. It did suggest, however, that the work would help readers understand why the U.S. had taken military action in Afghanistan. In April 2002, the Italian liberal daily La Stampa ran a front-page cartoon showing an Israeli tank, emblazoned with a Jewish star, pointing a large gun at the baby Jesus in a manger, while the baby pleads, "Surely they don't want to kill me again, do they?" In Corriere Della Sera, another cartoon showed Jesus trapped in his tomb, unable to rise, because Ariel Sharon, rifle in hand, is sitting on the sepulcher. Sweden's largest morning paper, Dagens Nyheter, ran a caricature of a Hassidic Jew accusing anyone who criticized Israel of anti-Semitism. Another leading Swedish paper, Aftonbladet, used the headline "The Crucifixion of Arafat." If the misreporting and bias were limited to one or two newspapers or television programs in each country, it might be possible to shrug them off. But they are not. Bashing Israel even extends to local papers that don't usually cover foreign affairs, such as the double-page spread titled "Jews in jackboots" in "Luton on Sunday." (Luton is an industrial town in southern England.) Or the article in Norway's leading regional paper, Stavanger Aftenblad, equating Israel's actions against terrorists in Ramallah with the attacks on the World Trade Center. Grotesque and utterly false comparisons such as these should have no place in reporting or commenting on the Middle East. Yet although the French court ruling -- the first of its kind in Europe -- is a major landmark, no one in France seems to care. The country's most distinguished newspaper, the paper of record, has been found guilty of anti-Semitism. One would have thought that such a verdict would prompt wide-ranging coverage and lead to extensive soul-searching and public debate. Instead, there has been almost complete silence, and virtually no coverage in the French press. And few elsewhere will have heard about it. Reuters and Agence France Presse (agencies that have demonstrated particularly marked bias against Israel) ran short stories about the judgment in their French-language wires last week, but chose not to run them on their English news services. The Associated Press didn't run it at all. Instead of triggering the long overdue reassessment of Europe's attitude toward Israel, the media have chosen to ignore it. (Mr. Gross is a former Jerusalem correspondent of the Sunday Telegraph and the New York Daily News.) http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/
Posted
6/03/2005 06:52:00 PM
1. Syrian Fascism Strikes Again
The Kurds are a homeless people whose plight has never interested the Axis of Evil, linking the Moonbat Left with Islamofascism. The struggle of the Kurds in Turkey and Iraq are somewhat familiar to Westerners. What is less well known is that Syria also has a large Kurdish minority. Strangely, all those people so convinced that creating a 23rd Arab state and granting "national self-determination" to Arabs called by the media "Palestinians" is the only conceivable solution to the Middle East conflict. Yet none of these same people have come out for Kurdish national self-determination!! Why not? Maybe because Kurdish self-determination would not help in destroying Israel? The Syrian Kurds in particular are harshly repressed by the Ba'athist fascists. This week the body of the head of the Kurdish movement in Syria was recovered after he had been murdered by the regime. The body of Sheik Machouk Alkhaznawi was returned to his family yesterday, three weeks after he went missing. Amnesty International, which no one suspects of being pro-America or pro-Israel, and members of the Kurdish Democratic Party said he was killed by authorities, citing evidence of torture on the body. The Assad junta claimed he had been killed by a mysterious criminal gang. A few days before his disappearance, the Canadian Globe and Mail correspondent Paul Koring interviewed Mr. Alkhaznawi in Damascus, for a story about Syria's newly emboldened political dissidents. "Either the regime will change, or the regime must go," he said in the interview. That sealed his fate. The 46-year-old Kurdish cleric was a champion of tolerance, respect between Arabs and Kurds, and the compatibility of democracy and Islam, before he disappeared last month. He came from the remote Syrian city of Qameshli, in the heart of what 20 million Kurds call Kurdistan. The Ba'athists also continue to murder people in Lebanon, despite the "withdrawal" of Syria troops from Lebanon, a withdrawal that left behind a large intelligence infrastructure and Syria-controlled terrorist groups. The NY Sun reports this week, "The Syrian dictatorship is tottering and weak. President Bush has decided that Bashar al-Assad will be gone and that the route to Iran is through Syria." Reuters and the NY Times report that Lebanese journalist Samir Kassir was murdered this week via a car bomb by Syrian operatives for criticizing the Ba'athist regime. He had written: "The Baathist regime in Syria is behaving the same way it behaved in Lebanon, making mistake after mistake." "Bashar al-Assad and Emile Lahoud are behind it," a senior Lebanese opposition leader, Marwan Hamade, told the Christian Science Monitor. "The Syrian regime is responsible from head to toe for this horrific terrorist crime. Lebanon's opposition should promptly close ranks anew to have every Syrian intelligence cell left behind in Lebanon ruthlessly smashed," the general manager of An-Nahar, Gebran Tueini, told reporters at the scene. Meanwhile, the NY Times reports this week that Syria test-fired three Scud missiles last Friday, including one that broke up over Turkish territory and showered missile parts down onto unsuspecting Turkish farmers. All the missiles were launched from northern Syria, near Minakh, north of Aleppo, Israeli officials said. One was sent about 250 miles to southernmost Syria, near the Jordanian border. The one that broke up was fired southwest toward the Mediterranean, over the Turkish province of Hatay, the ancient Antioch, and shed debris over two villages there. The Israelis said they had film of the launching and breakup. The test was the first time Syria had fired a missile over another country - a member of NATO and possible upcoming member of the EU, no less! - when Damascus could easily have moved its mobile launchers to the center of the country to avoid flight over Turkey altogether. The Moonbat Left continues its jihad in support of the Syrian regime and against Amrerican "warmongering" against Syrian fascism. We expect Counterpunch soon to launch its "Take a Ba'athist to Lunch" program. It is time for President Bush to teach the Ba'athists the game of "dominoes!" http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/syrian-fascism-strikes-again.html 2. "Flush Newsweek Down The Toilet" by Irwin N. Graulich http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/igraulich_20050602.html 3. Smart Jews: http://harpend.dsl.xmission.com/Documents/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf 4. Defend the Humans from the Moonbats: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18253 5. Plumbing: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=14896
Thursday, June 02, 2005
Posted
6/02/2005 08:52:00 PM
How to Solve the Counterpunch Problem via the "One Magazine Solution"!! by Steven Plaut We have this amzing idea for how to deal with the Far-Left web magazine Counterpunch. It is called the "One-Magazine Solution". The idea is that Counterpunch and Frontpage Magazine merge and then continue to operate as a single web magazine under the hegemonic control of David Horowitz and the Frontpage people, while the Counterpunch writers and editors would be assured minority rights, except for those Counterpunchers born outside the US, like Alexander Cockburn, who would be expelled back to the countries whence they came. Now before you accuse me of ingesting the same substances as the editors of Tikkun Magazine, let me explain. The Neofascist Left, and by that I mean the extremist Left best represented by Counterpunch and "The Nation" (or - as I prefer to call it - The MoonbatNation) have in recent years been demonstrating a refreshing candor and openess when it comes to their anti-Semitism. Unlike so many others, they do not pretend that they simply oppose Zionism but-got-nothing-against-dem-Joos-as-such-mind-you. Specifically, they are entirely open about the fact that they want to see Israel destroyed. They call it the "One State Solution," also known as the Rwanda Solution, in which Israel will be enfolded into an Arab Palestinian Islamofascist Third World Kleptocratic State, encompassing all Israeli territory, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. The Jews would be assured minority status in this Arab-majority entity, and so would be treated almost as well as the Copts in Egypt or the Kurds in Iraq or the southern Sudanese are today. Now, how come Israel is the only country on the planet that these Mega-Moonbats demand be destroyed, you ask? It is very simple. Israel is the only Jewish country and the Neofascist Left hates Jews. Sometimes the Lefties pretend they want Israel destroyed because they claim it is a "discriminatory" or "immoral" country, but no one thinks they really believe that. Israel is by far the least discriminatory and immoral country in the Middle East and the state of human rights in Israel is at least a thousand times better than in the next-best state in the Middle East. In recent years, Counterpunch has run quite a few articles opposing the "Two State Solution" and endorsing the "One State Solution". The "Two-State Solution" to the Middle East conflict should in fact be more correctly termed the "Twenty Four State Solution." As envisioned in the "Road Map", under this the Arabs would add to their twenty two existing states, holding land almost twice the area of the United States, yet another state, a twenty-third Arab state to be called Palestine, the second Arab state to be erected in the territory of historic Palestine (the other one being named Jordan), and the Jews would keep their one tiny statelet with land smaller than New Jersey. That is the Bush plan. But the Neofascist Left insists that this "Road Map" solution is too generous to the Jews and too stingy to the Arabs. Their preferred solution is to turn the Levant into Rwanda and resolve the ethnic conflict the same way the Rwandans did. The last in the series of "Destroy Israel" columns in Counterpunch is run there this week, A Two-State Solution is No Solution, by Islamic Fascist Mazin Qumsiyeh. [The number of neonazis and Islamofascists has been growing in the Counterpunch Cockburn stables. ] The "one-state solution", based upon sustaining all states on earth no matter how evil but destroying Israel, was proposed in Counterpunch pages in recent times by mega-terrorist (now in prison awaiting conviction) Sami Al-Arian, Ray Hanania, Will Youmans, Michael Neumann, Simon Jones (a Counterpunch regular who insists that Jews must liberate themselves by helping to destroy Israel and create a Second Holocaust of Jews, and a collaborator with Swedish nazi Israel Shamir), Omar Barghouti (who just was reduced to tears by the British Association of University Teachers rejecting his academic pogrom against Israel), and so many others we got tired. Counting passing moonbats makes us sleepy. [A bit ironically, the Leftist Lord Haw-Haw of Israel, Uri Avnery, OPPOSED the "one-state solution" on Counterpunch pages. ] "The Nation", always trying to out-jihad Counterpunch and bypass it in the Anti-Semitism Tournament of the Left, has also long endorsed the Rwanda Solution, er - we mean - the "One-State Solution" in which Israel would be destroyed, and of course that would have nothing at all to do with the fact that Israel is the only country the Jews have on earth. The Germans called it the Final Solution. None of this of course has stopped the Columbia School of Journalism, located in that Columbia Madrassah on the Upper West Side, from turning the school's web site over to the control of "The Nation's" Uber-Moonbat editor and publisher, the Jew-hating, Castro-loving Victor Navasky in recent days. http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/how-to-solve-counterpunch-problem-via.html
Posted
6/02/2005 04:30:00 PM
1. The "Oslo Syndrome": http://jewishworldreview.com/0605/gaffney060105.php3 You may also wish to join this: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/subs.php 2. More Frivolous "Libel Suits" from the Anti-Semitic Ultra-Moonbats Eyal Sivan is one of the most openly anti-Semitic far-leftist extremists in Europe. He grew up in Israel but then migrated to Europe, where he divides his time between making Jew-bashing anti-Israel films and filing frivolous SLAPP suits against people who criticize him. In recent years a growing anti-democratic harassment tactic used by the very worst left-wing fascists has been the filing of such SLAPP suits for "libel" as a way to silence critics of the Left. SLAPP (which stands for 'Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation') suits are anti-democratic harassment suits in which someone attempts to suppress the free speech of his critics. They are illegal in many parts of the US and there are penalties for those who file them. Eyal Sivan is a radical anti-Semitic pro-terror ex-Israeli "film artist" living in France (where else?). He is the French equivalent to that other notorious ex-Israeli Eurobat, Dror Feiler. Feiler lives in Sweden and who made the "sculpture art" celebrating the suicide bombing woman who mass murdered 23 people at the Maxim restaurant in Haifa, many of them children, including three generations of two families. One of her victims is a 10 year old who lost his parents and was permanently blinded by the blast. Sivan lately has been co-making anti-Israel propaganda films with a local Palestinian pro-terrorist. Eyal Sivan likes to make venomous propaganda movies against Israel and Jews. In one of his recent movies, "Route 181 - Splinter from a Trip in Palestine-Israel," he devotes much of the screen time to justifying the Arab attack on Israel in 1948 designed to annihilate Israel (and its population) and which coincidentally gobbled up the land the UN had allocated to become an Arab state of Palestine. The Arabs, declares Sivan, were in the right when they attacked Israel in 1948, because the Arabs were seeking a nice Rwanda-style bi-national state with an Arab majority in which the Jews would be treated almost as well as are the southern Sudanese Christians and animists today. The film also alleges all sorts of gory Israeli "war crimes" against the poor innocent Arabs of 1948, including imaginary rapes. It is capped by scenes of railroad tracks designed to be associated in the minds of French viewers with scenes from the "SHOAH" movie about the Holocaust, and of course with Israel in the role of Nazi Germany. [Ironically, when Sivan needed an actor to play a thuggish Israeli, he chose an Arab. Talk about racial profiling!] This latest "film" was broadcast in England, Germany and France, a 4.5 hour pseudo-documentary. Sivan wanted it to be the Palestinian answer to the French documentary movie "Shoah" about the Holocaust. Sivan has also long justified arson attacks against French Jews and their synagogues, saying the French Jews themselves were to blame for these (Jerusalem Report, March 22, 2004) because they support Israel. Ah, but then the heroic French Jewish philosopher Alain Finkielkraut described the cinematic atrocity being prepared by Sivan as "incitement to murder Jews" and a tissue of lies. He also openly called Sivan a Jewish anti-Semite. Sivan decided to file a frivolous harassment SLAPP libel suit in France against Finkielkraut for daring to tell the truth. Meanwhile, other French intellectuals petitioned the Pompideau Center and other institutions not to screen the scurrilous propaganda film of Sivan, successfully. It was evidently not screened. In Israel, Sivan is embroiled in a conflict with members of the family of the heroic Gideon Hausner, who had been the prosecutor in the famous trial of Adolf Eichmann, the German architect of the Holocaust captured and executed by Israel. The Hausners began petitioning the Attorney General last February to prosecute Sivan, because of his deliberately distorted "documentary" film on Hausner and the trial, in which he misrepresented and mocked the deceased Hausner, they insist. The family members want Sivan charged with "receiving profit from deliberate fraud," a crime in Israel. The frivolous harassment suit against Finkielkraut is stuck in the French court backlog, but Sivan may be getting his comeuppance from an Israeli court in the Hausner case. Now Sivan has decided to try the harassment suit tactic all over again, this time against a leading Israeli professor and politician from Israel's Zionist Left. Sivan this week filed a "libel suit" against Israeli Prof. Amnon Rubinstein, a professor of constitutional law and a one-time cabinet minister from the leftist Meretz party. Two weeks back, Rubinstein had called Sivan an anti-Semite in an opinion column that was published in the Jerusalem Post and also in Maariv, Israel's second largest daily. Rubinstein had denounced the attempts by Sivan to paint Israel in his films, especially in "Route 181", as morally equivalent to Nazi Germany. Rubinstein also noted that Sivan's film had been banned in France but was being screened in Israel itself by local far-leftist moonbats. Yes, the same anti-Semitic film by Sivan that French institutions refused to screen, too anti-Semitic even for FRENCH tastes, has been screened repeatedly in Israel itself by the far-Leftist Jerusalem Cinematek, a moonbat institution maintained by Jerusalem taxpayers and which is always on the lookout for seditious anti-Israel propaganda that it can screen as "art". You may recall its role in promoting the Goebbals-like film "Jenin Jenin", a propaganda film produced with PLO funds whose own producer has admitted he filled it with lies. The architecture department at the Bezalel College also showed it. Rubinstein has courageously stuck to his guns and has announced he will retract nothing he wrote about Sivan and will certainly not apologize. Sivan will continue to attempt to suppress the free speech of his critics anti-democratically using SLAPP suit harassment. (For links and clean copy, go to http://discoverthenetwork.org/moonbatcentral/2005/06/more-frivolous-libel-suits-from-anti.html ) 3. Stoned Ollie: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18254
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Posted
6/01/2005 03:46:00 PM
1. Subject: Oliver the Stoned
The Grand Global Conspiracy behind the latest Oliver Stone Arrest By Steven Plaut Well, the media are reporting the latest Oliver Stone was arrested for drug and alcohol charges in Beverly Hills over the weekend. They found illegal drugs in Ollie?s car and arrested him for DUI. Oliver Stone had earlier been arrested in 1999 on alcohol and drug charges and, as part of a plea bargain, and at that time agreed to enter a rehabilitation program. He had been arrested for drugs before, the first time being when he was only 21. Now we know what you are all thinking, and that is that the media accounts of this could not possibly be the correct descriptions of events and there must be some grand and awful story-behind-the-story that explains the arrest. After all, Oliver Stoned is best known for his cinematic portrayal of conspiracy plots in his movies and his far-left politics, including open endorsements of communism and a sycophant ?documentary? celebrating Fidel Castro, so one-sided that HBO refused to air it. Stone?s views about Cuba and Castro may be summed up in this one citation: ?Street demonstrations in favor of Fidel Castro are not a fake. If they were, those demonstrators should win an Oscar for best acting. I can testify to this because I have seen the joy on their faces when people come up to the president." Elsewhere he added, ?In Cuba, I observed an openness and freedom that I had not found in any other country in the region, the Caribbean or Central America." Stone?s pronouncements include issuing a statement after 9-11 blaming the American media companies for the terrorist attacks. At an HBO Films panel on "Making Movies That Matter," Oliver Stoned states that huge corporations that make mediocre movies are part of what made Osama bin Laden plan the Sept. 11 attack. "They control culture," he said of the corporations, in comments quoted in the New Yorker. "They control ideas. And I think the revolt of Sept. 11th was about 'F-- you! F-- your order.' " Stone also said, "This attack was pure chaos, and chaos is energy." ("The Stars Weigh In," San Francisco Chronicle, October 16, 2001.) Soon after that, Stone spoke at Brown University. According to the Brown Alumni Magazine (January/February 2002). Stone derided the entire enterprise as well as the movie industry and the history profession. ?Don?t believe most of the stuff you see in the movies,? the Oliver told a Brown audience on December 1. Hollywood, said the director of Platoon and JFK, is controlled by ?chickens? and ?concentration camp guards.? History books are no better, Stone warned. ?Most historians are ass-kissers and tenure seekers,? he said. What to believe then? ?Believe my stuff,? Stone said. Every single scene in his film about the JFK assassination has been shown to be a fabrication. Drawing comparisons to Vietnam, Stone accused the U.S. government of withholding the truth about the war in Afghanistan: ?Bin Laden was completely protected by the oil companies in this country who told [President] Bush not to go after him because it would piss off the Saudis.? Then, Stone claimed, there?s the cover-up involving ground zero: limbs getting cut off bodies for jewelry, a man walking off with $132 million. Stone's paranoia and his contempt for historic facts are most visible in the movie "JFK" which turns the historical record on its head. This did not stop a CAL-Berkeley moonbat from presenting Stone to his students as a ?historian.? Stone claims to be half-French, keeps saying he will flee America for France because of Republicans, and got him some cushy subsidies from the French government, something that prompted one wag to suggest he change his name to "Oliver Caillou." (Caillou is the French word for stone). One can tell he has a strong French streak in his character because he insists he lost his virginity to a prostitute, because he didn't get the opportunity to meet girls at his single-sex school. At least one web site is devoted to boycotting anything connected with the Oliver. Here is a typical Stone take on reality: "The right wing is the same everywhere, in Cuba or Viet Nam. It is like an octopus, snatching everything with its tentacles. They control the Internet, radio and TV stations, and newspapers. But above all, they are perfectly organized. Right wingers master the art of negative publicity and are capable of destroying the image of anyone they consider to be their enemy. They annihilate anything opposed to their interests, utilizing mass emailing, articles, and reports. In the United States, censorship is the order of the day. It is really sad to think that Florida may end up deciding the November elections once again, and that the extreme-right wing, including anti-Castro groups, may manipulate the results for a second time. These people are blinded by patriotic fanaticism and are ready to invade any country, and shoot down planes if necessary. They thought that my first movie about Castro, 'Comandante,' was hideous, and they killed it almost before it was even born. They were m erely afraid of it." Now as I was saying above, there has GOT to be more to the latest Stone arrest than some drunk driving and pharmaceuticals. It must have himself been the victim of a colossal frameup! So here is our take on what REALLY happened. We suspect that some rogue CIA and FBI agents were outraged by Stone?s exposure of CIA plotting in his films and especially of the conspiracy behind the JFK assassination. SO they got together with some wealthy Christian fundamentalists and Jewish neoconservatives in control of the Pentagon and they set to work. First thing they do is get the oil companies protecting Osama bin Laden to pony up some cash and then they take this to the Beverly Hills police headquarters while Commissioner Axel Foley hooks them up with some local UCLA chemistry professors. These professors design a special chemical spray to make the innocent Stone appear to be drunk while he is driving and this is inserted through special vents in the undercarriage of Stone?s Mercedes using a device first designed by the Watergate burglars to make McGovern appear dazed. Then the Beverly Hills cops plant drugs in the Stone vehicle, which actually were originally part of a shipment the CIA was planning to sell in East LA to gangbangers in order to raise money for the contras and with which to bribe neoconservative magazine columnists. The device was actually inserted into the car when Stone?s attention was being distracted by an agent dressed as a Los Angeles street walker speaking French and some West Hollywood dudes with tee-shirts that read ?Yum, Alexander was Great!? 2, The Jews for a Second Holocaust are Back: http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3084217,00.html 3. Nice Piece: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/123582/index.php 4. Academic Pogromchiks: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18251
|