Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Posted
2/28/2006 02:48:00 PM
The United States is not the only part of the Diaspora plagued by dopey liberals. The UK also has its share.
Some of them seem to be in charge at the "Jewish Telegraph", which serves the Machester-Leeds area of the UK. Among its regular columnists is Uri Geller, so you know how serious a paper it is. It also does not consider Red Ken Livingston to be an anti-Semite.
Another columnist is one Jeremy Rosen, a Rabbi in London with ordination from the Mir Yeshiva. Rosen's column this week is an attack on my earlier column, run in the NY Jewish Press and in several internet web sites, about how the "reports" of Jewish settlers cutting down Palestinian olive trees appear to be lies motivated by a political agenda on the part of people seeking to libel the settlers. Earlier Rosen had referred to the Jewish Press as a "North American journal of Jewish juvenilia." (http://www.jeremyrosen.com/blog/2005_09_01_jeremyrosen_archive.html) Talk about Lashon Ha-Ra!
Rosen's attack can be read at http://www.jewishtelegraph.com/rosen.html , Rosen also runs it on his personal blog at http://www.jeremyrosen.com/blog/2006/02/olive-trees.html , with some extra segments.
Let us note that the Jewish Telegraph saw fit to run his attack without having first bothered to run my own piece, which can be read at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/putting-the-ax-to-the-tree-chopping-canard/, thus avoiding the possibility for JT readers actually knowing what is going on or what the original article even said. In other words, a typical job of PC smear and censorship on the part of a Jewish liberal at the Jewish Telegraph. You can read the PAIR of articles, mine and his response, and make up your own mind, but the Jewish Telegraph's readers cannot.
Rosen takes 3 or 4 of my sentences out of context and runs them in an attempt to mock my claims that the "reports" of tree vandalization by settlers are fabrications. I stand by my article, which is fully documented. Indeed the vandalization stories themselves originate with Amira Hass, whom Rosen elsewhere dismisses as an anti-Israel nut.
Rosen then escalates his Lashon Ha-Ra and compares me to Ilan Pappe as an "extremist from Haifa University," smears the NY Jewish Press as "admittedly an extreme right-wing paper that makes Kahana (sic) sound a pussy cat." I guess he has forgoteen that leprosy is the Torah's penalty for Lashon Ha-Ra. He then dismisses my whole claim that Palestinians were chopping down their own trees and blaming it on the settlers because the Israeli government is paying out cash compensation to Palestinians claiming their trees were vandalized. Rosen writes: "As if tight-fisted Israeli exchequers under economic pressure are going to dole out compensation for no good reason."
Jewish liberals never let facts get in the way of their dogmas. The payout of cash compensation by the Israeli government to Palestinians claiming their trees were damaged is a fact, unbelievable perhaps but still true, and has been confirmed by all the liberal and leftist newspapers in Israel.
So much for Rosen's own credibility. I am a bit confused, however, as to how someone claiming to be a Rabbi allows himself to smear me and the Jewish Press baselessly while simply ignoring actual facts.
Most of Rosen's articles involve citing Jewish texts and sources to promote his own liberal ideas in politics. One of them talks about how wonderful it is when Jews marry non-Jews (http://www.jeremyrosen.com/blog/2005/07/marrying-out.html#links ). Rosen considers Noam Chomsky a "brilliant thinker" (http://www.jeremyrosen.com/blog/2005_06_01_jeremyrosen_archive.html ). Here is his take on Zionism: "I agree with the Satmar point of view only in so far as it removes religion from Zionism." http://www.jeremyrosen.com/blog/2005_08_01_jeremyrosen_archive.html ) Rosen has also expressed support for the campaign of PETA, the animal rights nuts, against kosher meat in the US.
In previous columns Rosen wrote, "Some would say that Israel has brutalized the Palestinians, turning them into crude killers," and generally praised the "Munich" movie. Here is Rosen on the Hamas victory: "(The Hamas) has declared it will continue its Hudnah if Israel does. I would rather have Hamas abiding by its Hudnah while calling for Israel.s destruction than Fatah declaring it supports Israel.s right to exist while doing whatever it can, in whatever way possible, to destroy it. At least if Hamas says something it tends to stick to it.... It was actually Israel that helped establish Hamas because its Divide and Rule policy led it to believe that establishing a counterbalance to Fatah would weaken Palestinian political power."
Speaking of urban legends being passed off as fact by liberuhs.... Afterword: Of course this Rosen is a brother to Rabbi David Rosen of "inter-religious dialogue" fame, as well as Rabbi Micky Rosen, head of Yakar in Jerusalem, a strong backer of Rabbis for "Human Rights"who hosted Amira Hass a few weeks ago at their "Yakar" institute...
Posted
2/28/2006 11:43:00 AM
1. New Jersey conference to address subject of leftist anti-Semitism: http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/022306/njactivists.html 2. Is Neturei Karta a terrorist threat? http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2006/02/do-neturei-karta-represent-terrorist.html 3. US Campus Wars: http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=267 4. Israel's Tenured Left: http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=256 5. British leftist lies about Israeli universities: http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=241 6. Dershowitz on the Defenestration of Lawrence Summers: http://dangerousprofessors.net/ Jacoby on same: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/02/26/anatomy_of_summerss_fall/ 7. Why Mommy is a Democrat Years ago I visited the Soviet Union before the collapse of communism and witnessed how young Russian and Ukrainian children were expected to walk around with little pins showing Baby Lenin, I guess the communist analogy to Baby Jesus, on their gray poorly-designed clothing. I was reminded of Baby Lenin pins when I ran across the newest initiative in liberal brainwashing of the preschool set, "Why Mommy is a Democrat," (http://littledemocrats.net/) a book being promoted to turn Barney fans into drooling Democrats and Pro-Terror Power Rangers. Its publishers proclaim that the book helps draw toddlers and young children to the "core values of the Democratic Party," I guess meaning appeasing terrorists, socialist redistribution, tax till you drop and massive new spending, gay marriage, affimative apartheid, and Hillarycare. The book was composed by one Jeremy Zilber in Madison, Wisconsin. It costs $8 including shipping. The web site features endorsements of the book by several politicians. I am waiting for someone to do a spoof of the book, showing Mommy becoming a Democrat while seated in a car next to Teddy Kennedy speeding off towards Chappaquidock. http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2006/02/why-mommy-is-democrat.html Maybe Mommy became a Democrat because Daddy would not marry her when she got pregnant and afterwards refused to pay child support? 8. Ban "Peace Studies": http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21451 and http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21446 9. Interested in back postings of Plaut Incitements? They are archived at www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com Pass it on!
Sunday, February 26, 2006
Posted
2/26/2006 03:22:00 PM
1. Waskow's New "Chaver" Now if you are like me, you consider the term "Reconstructionist Rabbi" a bit of an oxymoron. I do not quite know what Reconstructionism *is* (I prefer to call it Reconstructionist Deconstructionism, by the way), but I certainly do not consider it to be a legitimate movement within Judaism (regardless of what it might have once thought it was becoming, back in the days of Mordecai Kaplan). It is today little more than a whacky-dopey political movement that is based on "belief" in nothing at all except the left's agenda. It's "Rabbinic Seminary" was long ago hijacked by Tikkunites, and evidently was then merged with Rolling Stone Magazine, based on course contents. Many members of the Reconstructionist congregations I am familiar with are not even Jewish. Reconstructionism is about as legitimate a branch of Judaism as is the "Jews for Jesus". And while the entire movement is muddled and loopy, none come close to the level of complete lunacy as "Rabbi" Arthur Waskow. Long nicknamed Rabbi Woodstock in these corners, Waskow has devoted his life to promoting a pseudo-Judaism based upon bashing Israel, bashing America, green environmentalist extremism, and recently has even been promoting polygamy as a great Judaic ethic. His understanding of Judaism evidently comes from the Easy Rider movie. He plays Rabbi Cheech to Michael Lerner's Rabbi Chong, and the Cheech-and-Chong tag team have long dominated Tikkun and its satellites. Waskow is not taken seriously by anyone with any semblance of an understanding of Judaism, but nevertheless is a regular commentator at the "Jerusalem Report", which has staked out the Jewish Left as its own turf. The magazine is popular among the Woodstockischer Chassidim. Which brings us to Rabbi Woodstock's letter in the Jerusalem Report of March 6, 2006. Responding to complaints among Jewish leaders that Venezuelan chief Hugo Chavez is an anti-Semitic and anti-American moonbat, Waskow rushes to Chavez' defense. His letter is entitled "Chaver Chavez". (I guess since Clinton's use of the term *Chaver*, nothing more demeaning to it can be done!) Waskow claims the reports of Hugo making anti-Jewish remarks are "mistaken". He insists Chavez is helping the poor folks in Philadelphia, where Waskow tokes, by providing them with cheaper oil. "Now they are receiving oil at very low prices from the Chavez government," opines the "Rabbi". We are not sure what Waskow had smoked before making THAT claim! While he criticizes Chavez for not being environmentalist enough for Waskow's PETA tastes, he also defends Chavez from attacks by Secretary Rumsfeld, insisting that while Hitler burned people alive in furnaces, Chavez is helping keep people alive by giving them oil to heat their furnaces. Yep, he really writes that! You may recall that Chavez said in a televised Christmas Eve speech that "minorities, descendants of those who crucified Christ ... have grabbed all the wealth of the world for themselves." I do not think he was talking about the Incas. The Wall Street Journal's "Americas" columnist, Mary Anastasia O'Grady, charged that his words constituted an "ugly anti-Semitic swipe that was of a piece with an insidious assault over the past several years on the country's Jewish community." Chavez was one of Iraq's friends before the war. The Weekly Standard has run a long piece<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/903jhsjt.asp>on Chavez' anti-Semitism. He supplied Iraq with goods in violation of the embargo and was seen at least twice on national TV kissing Saddam Hussein. Earlier last year, the Caracas police stormed a Jewish pre-school with a lame excuse of looking for terrorists; they harassed the parents and petrified Jewish children. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001373.html>, and French journals *Lib?ration* and *Le Monde* have accused Ch?vez of being an anti-Semite. Chavez is so openly anti-Semitic that even Alexander Cockburn and Counterpunch endorse him. But Waskow seems to *adore his * Rabbi Hugo<http://www.spymac.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=193875>, indeed seems to confuse him for the Vilna Gaon, not only because of Reb Hugo's anti-Semitism but of course mainly because of his gutter anti-Americanism<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=12431>. All of which makes Arthur Waskow the Harry Belafonte of the Jewish community, except that Belafonte may know more about real Judaism than Rabbi Woodstock does. Here is an older posting on this matter: After painful research I have now traced the origins of a bizarre sect of Hassidim. They originate in the Belarussian *stedtel *named *Bialowoodstock*. They have become known for short as the *Woodstockischer Hassidim*. Their movement spread at first to Galicia and Moldavia, where followers would search the forest floors in the Bulkovina in order to find hallucenogenic mushrooms and cannabis. Later the sect moved its headquarters to Philadelphia, with devotees as far off as Sebastopol (California). The Woodstockischers, also called the Mastoolishers, are led by a renowned Rav known as the Woodstock Rebbe Shlita, although before the era of perestroika he was also called Arthur Moscow. His follows are organized into groups called the Havurot of Heaviness. Occasionally, the Woodstock Rebbe holds his own Tisch-In or Be-In. He also specializes in romping through the forest while hugging trees. The Woodstockischer Hassidim are best known for their singing. The following is a typical song. It is of course in Yiddish, but you may be able to grasp the basic message in it if you really concentrate: Und when Der Rebbe Tokes, Und when Der Rebbe Tokes, A-tokin go all the Hassidim, A-tokin go all the Hassidim. Und when Der Rebbe Trips, Und When Der Rebbe Trips, A-trippin go all the Hassidim. Und when der Rebbe Freaks, Und When Der Rebbe Freaks, Freaking go all the Hassidim. Und when Der Rebbe Trucks, und when der Rebbe Trucks, All the Woodstockischers keep on a-truckin. 2. Some anti-Jewish cartoons that have never upset the Bleeding Hearts and Caring Crowd: http://somebodyhelpme.info/cartoons/anti-Semitic/anti-Semitic.html 3. An ex-Israeli anti-Semite endorses a British anti-Semite: http://counterpunch.com/atzmon02252006.html Here is the background to this story: http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1213322,00.html 4. Excerpt from February 17, 2006 report to Ohio Jewish Communities: BOYCOTTS- JCPA reported this week that the Association of American University Professors postponed its conference on academic boycotts. JCPA and its member agencies expressed concern over the conference's attendees-nearly half of which were outspoken supporters of an academic boycott of Israel-and the necessity of such a conference when the AAUP has held a long-standing policy against academic boycotts. Funders of the conference urged its postponement when Holocaust-denying material was circulated to conference attendees as background reading. 5. Who remembers where Chelsea went to school? http://www.humaneventsonline.com/blog-detail.php?id=12666 6. Barry Chamish smears Jonathan Pollard with yet another loony conspiracist "theory": http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2003/062503.htm 7. When President Bush announced that U.S. funds would be used to help rebuild a mosque damaged in Iraq this week, one would have expected an immediate firestorm of outrage from the ACLU and other liberal extremists. A "Violation of separation of church and state!" they would have been expected to argue in typical knee-jerk reaction. But, oddly enough, not a peep out of the ACLU, or the other usual suspects on the loony left. How to explain this indifference? After all, Bush's proposal involves an assault on the constitutionally-required separation of church and state, which, although it does not actually exist, is nevertheless revered as holy by liberals. Then I remembered. Liberals pursue church-state arguments only when it concerns Christian symbols and values. And they do so to advance their "Tear America Down" agenda. In other words, its perfectly fine to spend scores of millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to rebuild a Mosque in Iraq, but not OK to display a cross or nativity scene in a public park at Christmas, or to delineate the Ten Commandments in a court house or other government building in America. Once again, liberal hypocrisy proves very vexing. One is at a loss to explain how such misguided and harmful thinking is able to survive in a sophisticated, modern society like America. John W. Lillpop San Jose, Calif. 8. Goober's Latest "Thoughts": http://forum.chronwatch.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25647
Friday, February 24, 2006
Posted
2/24/2006 02:42:00 PM
1. So when Do Western Bleeding Hearts NOT Think that Cartoonists Need to be Repudiated? By Steven Plaut http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2006/02/no-riots-over-anti-semitic-cartoons.html
All those people whining about how the West needs to be more sensitive and all when it comes to cartoons depicting Moslems or Islamic symbols have never had anything to say about the vicious anti-Semitic cartoons of Michael Leunig, an Australian cartoonist. Leunig's cartoons are so anti-Semitic that they were subjects of a practical joke and hoax over the past few days. As you know, Iran is having its own Holocaust Denial Cartoon contest, to "avenge" the Danish cartoons that showed the Prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban, and some other offensive images. Perhaps as a prank to show how easily Leunig's own cartoons can pass for Nazi caricatures, an Australian freelance journalist operating under the pen name "The Chaser" sent one of the Leunig's images from 2002 to Iran.s Hamshahri newspaper, which is holding the cartoon competition on the Holocaust in .retaliation. for the publication of anti-Muslim images by Denmark.s Jyllands-Posten and other European newspapers. Leunig.s cartoon, which was accompanied by a fake email claiming that the submission was a .show of solidarity with the Muslim world,. was drawn for The Age in May 2002. The first section of the cartoon consists of a Jewish concentration camp inmate gazing up at the Nazi slogan, .Work brings Freedom.. The second section is of an Israeli soldier in 2002 confronted with another lie, .War brings Peace.. Subtle! You can view it here. He also drew a dumb picture that described the founder of Hamas merely as an .old Palestinian man in a wheelchair.. An Australian paper declined to run one of his cartoons that called Australian Prime Minister John Howard a "suckhole". Many people have accused the millionaire cartoonist of being an anti-Semite. Several Australian newspapers have refused to print Leunig's anti-Semitic cartoon, including The Age and its editor Michael Gawenda, and this ignited a roar of protest from the Trotsky-Trash and similar ultra-moonbats. Leunig has also defended Helen Darville (Demidenko), an author caught up in academic fraud but whose most serious atrocity was producing a virulently anti-semitic book called The Hand That Signed The Paper. She blames the Jews for all her problems and David Irving himself has nothing but praise for Darville. Ted Lapkin, policy director for the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council, said there was no denying Leunig's cartoons are offensive. "His cartoons have offended the Jewish community - but contrast the reaction here to the Middle East, where they are rampaging the streets over cartoons." Paul Gardner, chairman of the Jewish human rights group, the B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission, said it was "completely objectionable" for someone to falsely implicate Leunig by entering his cartoon in such a competition. But he described the cartoon as "entirely objectionable, because it made a false analogy between Nazism and the actions of Israel in its conflict with the Palestinians". 2. Is Juan Cole Moving to Yale? If so, then pity the end of academic standards at Yale. Cole is a pseudo-scholar who teaches at the University of Michigan. He used to be the chief jihadnik at the pro-terror anti-American and anti-Jewish Middle East Studies Association, a propaganda group pretending to be a scholarly association. Cole, who led the lobby to clear Saddam of any ties with terrorism, believes that a group of Jewish .neo-conservatives. largely runs U.S. policy toward the Middle East. His recurrent theory is that a nebulous .pro-Likud. cabal controls the U.S. government from a small number of key positions in the Executive Branch. Jonathan Calt Harris has declared: "He (Cole) is blindly anti-Israel to the point of being an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist, an apologist for radical Islam, and someone who despises American public opinion." Cole has also pushed the Israel divestment campaign by campus anti-Semites, supposedly because Arabs are "mistreated" by Israel. Never mind that Arabs in Israel are treated a thousand times better than are Arabs in Arab countries. Cole is notoriously dishonest, and is a close comrade of Justin Raimondo, whom Cole regards as a reliable source. The Yale Herald reveals the imminent threat to Yale students blowing in with the hot air from Michigan. One Yalie expresed her fears: 'Naamah Paley, another sophomore who took his class, pointed out that a professor can profoundly influence and alter students. perceptions of a controversial and complex topic. According to Paley, Cole.s lecture on the history of Zionism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was given on Rosh Hashanah, when no religious Jewish students were present in class to contest his views. Moreover, Paley said Cole.s midterm exam concentrated on the controversial massacres at the Arab village of Deir Yassin and Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon rather than on balanced coverage of Israeli history. For Paley, moreover, the close-minded opinions of a political firebrand like Cole can alienate and stifle students. Earlier this year, Paley met with Cole to discuss her interest in studying abroad in Egypt next year. Yet she said she feared engaging Cole in an argument or even mentioning her Judaism or Zionist beliefs. .I didn.t want him to see me in his eyes as a Jewish student, but as a serious student of Middle East studies who wanted to talk to him about Arabic,. she said. We recently revealed that Cole still links his personal web site to that of an unemployed Holocaust Denier and neo-nazi, Kurt Nimmo, whom Cole considers to be "progressive" and "academic", even though Nimmo himself (who writes poems about his own hemorrhoids) was even fired by Counterpunch for his dopey conspiracism and anti-Semitism. I guess Counterpunch now has higher standards than Yale.... 3. Euro-Anti-Semitism Chic: http://www.cafebabel.com/en/article.asp?T=T&Id=6071 4. A Nice Blog worth following: http://judeosphere.blogspot.com/ 5. Wisse on Harvard's Persecution of Summers: February 23, 2006 Coup d'.cole By RUTH R. WISSE February 23, 2006; Page A17 CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- The resignation of Lawrence Summers as president of Harvard turns the spotlight on the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS), which has consecrated more time and energy to his ouster than to any other project of the past five years. Until now, all blame has been leveled at the president: "Fear and manipulation have been used to govern maliciously," charged one professor, who has since been awarded with a deanship. But now that these cowering professors have successfully unseated their president, scrutiny will quite rightly be leveled at them. What do they gain from their victory, and what does the rest of the university stand to lose? The movement to unseat Mr. Summers remains a mystery to most people outside Harvard. In the early days of his presidency, he challenged several tenured professors to account for the direction of their research and teaching. After some faculty had signed a petition urging divestment from Israel, he warned against the recurrence of anti-Semitism in a new guise. At an academic conference on the under-representation of women in science, he speculated on the implications of the differences between male and female test scores. At convocation ceremonies he congratulated Harvard students who served in the ROTC, which had been banned from the campus since the days of the Vietnam War. Each of these actions offended one faculty interest group or another, and jointly they signaled a bold style of leadership in a direction broadly perceived as "conservative" -- though it was in the service of once-liberal ideals. Since most Americans think it appropriate for a president to thus demonstrate his stewardship and leadership, they could not understand why such actions should have triggered faculty revolt. Even members of the media had trouble understanding what the fuss was about: incredulous, for example, that academics would protest against any expressed opinion. The governing body that appointed Mr. Summers and gave him a mandate for change, the Harvard Corporation, seemed for its part to welcome the energy he brought to the job. Several neglected campus units, such as the Law School and the School of Education, flourished as a result of his interventions. Mr. Summers strongly supported new investments in science and technology, areas where Harvard had been falling behind. Harvard students frankly blossomed under the special attention he paid them. No university president in my experience had ever taken such a warm personal interest in undergraduate education. Not surprisingly, the students return his affection, polling three to one in favor of his staying on. The day he announced his resignation, they were out in force in Harvard Yard, chanting "Five More Years!" The student newspaper, the Harvard Crimson, has been outspoken in its criticism of the faculty that demanded the president's ouster. "No Confidence in 'No Confidence'" ran the headline of an editorial demonstrating the spuriousness of the charges being brought against the president, and reminding faculty to stay focused on the educational process that ought to be its main concern. Hence, supporters of the president are right to be dismayed by the corporation's decision to seek or to accept Mr. Summers's resignation. My colleague Alan Dershowitz calls it an "academic coup d'.tat by . . . the die-hard left of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences." A second colleague, Steven Pinker, thinks that the president may have lost the fight himself a year ago when he apologized to antagonists for his political incorrectness instead of holding his intellectual ground. For the moment, the attackers have won the day, asserting their right to dictate to the rest of the university the accommodations they favor. But student response to the ouster suggests another long-term outcome. Although the activists of yesteryear may have found a temporary stronghold in the universities, a new generation of students has had its fill of radicalism. Sobered by the heavy financial burdens most of their families have to bear for their schooling, they want an education solid enough to warrant the investment. Chastened by the fall-out of the sexual revolution and the breakdown of the family, they are wary of human experiments that destabilize society even further. Alert to the war that is being waged against America, they feel responsible for its defense even when they may not agree with the policies of the current administration. If the students I have come to know at Harvard are at all representative, a new moral seriousness prevails on campus, one that has yet to affect the faculty members because it does not yet know how to marshal its powers. As long as FAS went about its business as usual, no one may have noticed its skewed priorities, but its political victory sets its actions and inaction in bolder relief. The same professors who fought so hard to oust their president did not once since the events of 9/11 consider whether they owed any responsibilities to a country at war. FAS continued to ban ROTC from campus on the excuse that the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy discriminates against homosexuals. Many students realize that this is tantamount to letting others do the fighting while advertising their moral superiority. Several years ago, the Undergraduate Council voted to give ROTC its approval. Although the faculty ignored this vote and simply waited for that cohort to graduate, other students will sooner or later stand up for their contemporaries who want to serve their country. "Harvard's greatness has always come from its ability to evolve as the world and its demands change -- to educate and draw forth the energy of each successive generation in new and creative ways." These words by Mr. Summers as he announced his resignation may yet prove true, although he would not be the one to put them into effect. It is inconceivable that the currently entrenched culture of grievance should be allowed to continue to sour the university. Perhaps the corporation ought to have put FAS into receivership before giving up on its president. Since it has given in for the moment, we will have to wait a little longer for this new student generation to teach us courage. Ms. Wisse is the Martin Peretz Professor of Yiddish Literature and professor of comparative literature at Harvard. URL for this article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114066645117881041.html 6. Livingston suspended: http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1213322,00.html 7. Comment on Conspiracism: http://www.geocities.com/barryconspiracy/
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Posted
2/23/2006 11:37:00 AM
1. Sleaze
This is not the first time Daniel Abrams has been involved in Israeli politics. He has close personal ties with Shimon Peres and helps fund the "Peres Center", the pet "think tank" Peres operates to promote his "ideas". Israel's State Comptroller is already investigating a $120,000 contribution from Abrams in 2004 to Shimon Peres' campaign for the Labor Party primaries last November. Abrams is a wealthy American Jewish liberal, who owns and controls the "Slim Fast" product line of diet foods. Years ago I did a spoof of Abrams and his company when he was just about the investor in the world who accepted Shimon Peres' invitation (after the first Oslo Accord) to invest in the Gaza Strip. Abrams agreed to set up a Slim Fast factory there. I did a whole comedy routine based on this. I will save you the Full Monty thereof, but it involved setting up a factory for providing low-cal diet foods to the overeating suicide bombers in Gaza. This way they could trim the fat and avoid getting all that cellulite all over the celluloid of the film crew taking pictures of the carnage after they blow themselves up fort peace. Well, now it turns out that the same Abrams is a bedfellow of Ehud Olmert. Abrams had contributed NIS 193,000 to Olmert's campaign in the Jerusalem mayoral elections. But now new ties have been revealed. All the details are coming out in stages, but Abrams funneled quite a lot of money to Olmert personally in ways that are pretty obviously violations of Israel's campaign finance laws. Now Olmert has been involved in plenty of sleaze in the past. He was investigated for suspicion of taking bribes (http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2004/04/04/israel_shuts_corruption_probe_into_olmert?mode=PF ). In 1997 an Israeli court found Olmert innocent of charges that he had engaged in financial irregularities in the 1988 election campaign, when Olmert was treasurer of the Likud Party. Olmert claimed his only "mistake" then was that he signed financial reports without double-checking them. Olmert also took funds from Marc Rich, whom you may recall as one of Clinton's weasels, pardoned on Clinton's last day in office http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2001-02-22-richisrael.htm ). Campaign sleaze is not exactly unusual in Likud-Kadima (http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=240635&contrassID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y ), and even less so in the Labor Party. (See http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=8593=8593&format=0 ) The current sleaze involving Olmert and Abrams has to do with Olmert's private home in the expensive Rehavia neighborhood in Jerusalem. Olmert, while a full-time politician and civil servant, mysteriously raised oodles of cash to buy his home. The current scandal involves the fact that Olmert sold his Jerusalem home to Abrams operating through an offshore company for $2.69 million in 2004, but is still living there and paying the new owner rent. Why is this a scandal? Cause the home was evidently sold to Abrams for far more than it was worth and Abrams then leased it back to Olmert for a rent far BELOW what it is worth. Those of you who can put two and two together without using Excel might find this suspicious. Olmert also keeps changing his story about the deal (http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/686244.html ). The whole story came out because Haaretz started snooping. Haaretz is of course politically driven, hoping to boost the showing of Peretz and the Left in the coming elections, but the sleaze is nevertheless what one would expect from Olmert. (By the way, Netanyahu's people are calling him "Smolmert", based on "Smol" which means "Left". 2. Leftist Rules of Debating The following are the basic principles upon which all public debate must be conducted if you wish to be a true progressive and leftist person who cares: 1. Leftists should be free to call everyone else nasty names, because they are so moral, but no one should be permitted to call leftists nasty names. 2. For a leftist to call someone nasty names shows social concern and awareness. For someone to call a leftist a nasty name back is immature and impolite and avoiding the issues. 3. Leftists need never document their claims. 4. Whenever a leftist is presented with documentation of facts that contradict the leftist's theology, the leftist must insist that no facts have been presented at all. 5. No scientific sources that presents facts contradicting leftist theology are admissable. They must be dismisse as being "right-wing". 6. All arguments may be settled by telling a non-leftist that he reminds you of Rush Limbaugh. 7. Never ever take an economics course. 8. Never recognize the fact that every idea of Marx's was debunked over 150 years ago. Never read any social science written since Marx. Never admit that you know that Marx was a racist and anti-Semite. 9. Never visit the library. 10. Never study statistics or public policy analysis. 11. Always say "people of color" so everyone will know you care. 12. Recycle. 13. Whine. 14. Pretend that you do not care about material things, but never sell your VCR or cellular phone or condo to help the underprivileged. 15. Never admit that life ever involves tradeoffs. After all, when there are tradeoffs it is harder to feel righteous. 16. Always support proposals that make real problems of the world worse just as long as advocating them can make you feel caring and righteous. Remember, it is all about YOU! 17. Never admit that anything could be positive about the United States. 18. Always insist that there are few world problems that could not be improved through the destruction of Israel. 19. Always insist that you have no idea what political correctness is or that it exists. 20. Always use the female pronouns half the time or more. That way everyone will know you are egalitarian. 21. Insist that you are more caring and compassionate than anyone else. 22. Remember, you would prefer that poor people in the Third World starve rather than that they should embrace capitalism and live like you do. 23. Other people must always be required to relinquish their material things so that you may feel idealistic and righteous. 24. Your property is scared; other people's property is to be used for social engineering and doing good. 3. The "New Jews" of Europe: http://www.jewishpress.com/page.do/8535/The_'New_Jews'_Of_Europe.html 4. Rabbi Riskin is considered to be a very loderate and sensible guy: http://www.jewishpress.com/page.do/8533/Why_Amona%3F_A_Settler_Bares_His_Soul.html 5. Nice piece on the Dersh: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0206/blankley022206.php3?printer_friendly 6. Killing Dead Jews: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21410 7. Hamas Nazoids: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21418 8. A Zionist Moslem: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21411 9. Who says "settlements" have no use? http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395468741&pagename=JPost%2FJP Article%2FShowFull
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Posted
2/22/2006 08:26:00 PM
http://www.jewishpress.com/page.do/8515/The_Rise_of_Hamas_and_Decline_of_Israeli_Determination.html
The Rise of Hamas and Decline of Israeli Determination By: Steven Plaut In the biblical saga of the exodus from Egypt, there is a great military mystery. We are told that when the Israelites left Goshen in Egypt, they had 600,000 men of fighting age in their ranks, and - at least according to one reading of the text - they were well armed (hamushim). That being the case, why did they behave in such a cowardly manner, shuddering as Pharaoh's army approached? True, comments the great sage Ibn Ezra, the Egyptians had 600 chariots, but what are those when up against 600,000 fighting men? The medieval French rabbi Chezkuni makes the same point. The mystery gets more mysterious just a few lines later. After crossing into the Sinai wilderness, a handful of Amalekite terrorists harass the Israelites. But how many Amalekites could there have been, given that they were living off roots and bugs in the desert with no manna? Yet even then, the Jews were unable to fight off the Amalekites without Divine intervention and supernatural assistance. One explanation of why the Israelites had to spend 40 years in the desert is that they needed to be cured of their of cowardice and defeatism. Military challenges and powerful Canaanite kingdoms awaited them in the campaign to conquer the Promised Land. The generation that had known exile and slavery was unable to cope with that. It was necessary to wait for the next generation, born in freedom, to tackle the task. ******* The generational changing of the guard we read about in the Bible has been recreated in modern Israel, but in the reverse direction. The generation that had been raised in exile, suffering persecution and massacre, entered the Promised Land as military heroes, brilliant tacticians, and determined fighters. Yet within a short time they had been replaced with a new generation, one raised in freedom in their own sovereign state. This new generation lost the determination and courage of their fathers and grandfathers. It became infected with defeatism and cowardice; increasingly, it lost its willingness to resist and even to survive as a nation. This generational change was not apparent until the emergence of the Oslo peace process. In Israel's early years, Israelis manifested the courage and valor of the Israelites of the Book of Joshua. Small militias of Jews defeated the combined military forces of the invading Arab armies in the 1948-9 War of Independence. Modern Israel fought terrorism with a policy of "Zero Tolerance" and in the Sinai campaign of 1956 easily defeated Egyptian forces. A decade later Israelis crushed the combined military might of the Arab world and liberated Jerusalem. They again defeated those same forces in 1973, despite being caught in a surprise attack on Yom Kippur. And Israelis continued to demonstrate courage and resourcefulness in the war against Arab terror, most dramatically with the rescue at Entebbe. But some time between 1978 and 1992 a great transformation took place. Despite the long track record of military successes, the new generation of Israelis lost its willingness to fight and resist. It convinced itself that capitulation and appeasement are the only paths to peace. It decided that self-abasement is the key ingredient to good relations with its neighbors. Israelis elected leaders who hectored the new generation over their selfishness and bigotry, who insisted that the only reason peace had not yet emerged was that **Israelis** did not desire it enough. In a Middle East in which the Arabs control territory nearly twice the size of the Unites States (including Alaska), the new breed of Israeli leaders insisted that the war was still going on because Israelis held too much land - almost the size of New Jersey in total. In a Middle East already containing 22 sovereign Arab states - one of those states already controlling two-thirds of the land of Mandatory Palestine - the new breed of political leader in Israel maintained that creation of a 23rd Arab state could solve the whole conflict. Back when Israel was behind its 1949 "Green Line" borders, it was repeatedly attacked by Arab armies seeking its annihilation. But returning to those same borders (or something close to them), insist Israel's new leaders, will result in peace and tranquility. From 1992 onward, Israeli leaders insisted that peace could be achieved by pretending that war did not exist. And the greatest need of all, urgent and important above all else, was that the new generation of Israelis forget all of human and Jewish history, lest they infer from history that the policy of Oslo appeasement will not work. In many ways, the Hamas Putsch is the natural and inevitable outcome of 14 years of Israeli policy. It is not at all an exaggeration to say that Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin installed the Hamas Amalekites in power when they shook Arafat's hand on the White House lawn in 1993. It was there and then that they welcomed a Hamas army into the suburbs of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. East Jerusalem was turned over to Hamas for all intents and purposes when Peres and Yossi Beilin sent their representatives (illegally) to meet with PLO terrorists in Oslo in the late 1980's. The Hamas Putsch was not a surprise development but rather the inevitable fruition of the doctrine of appeasement and capitulation that has been embraced by an entire generation of Israelis. The "Oslo approach" has failed at each and every step of the way, producing the opposite of the results its apologists insisted they would deliver. Israeli goodwill measures produced escalated terrorism and suicide bombings. Israeli niceness was interpreted as weakness, and strengthened the most xenophobic forces and open Islamofascists among the Palestinians. Israeli flexibility and concessions triggered a worldwide campaign of anti-Semitism and demonization of Israel, especially in Europe. The Palestinians did not respond with flexibility and moderation, as the Oslo Camp had promised, but rather with open preparation for war. Israel has demonstrated since 1993 that the Jews are on the run, that the Jews have lost their will to survive. Palestinian Arabs drew the logical conclusion. With each failure of the "Oslo approach," with each manifestation that Israel's appeasement was resulting in inflated Palestinian expectations from armed conflict with Israel and escalating Palestinian intransigence, Oslo defeatism metastasized further throughout the political system of Israel. In the early 1980's, only the Israeli Communist party and its front groups were advocating an armed sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. By the late 1990's, this had become not only the platform of the Israeli Labor Party but also of the Likud. Even the "hawkish" wing of the Likud, led by Ariel Sharon, adopted what had been the Communist position. The unilateral Israeli eviction of the settlers from Gaza resulted in a massive escalation in the firing of rockets and mortars into Jewish civilian areas in the Negev. Yet the lesson that Israel's political leaders have drawn from this is that more evictions of Jews, this time from the West Bank, are what is needed to restore calm. And in spite of hopes that the Hamas Putsch might at long last wake Israelis up to the folly of their overnment's policies these past 13 years, acting Prime Minister Olmert's first two responses to the Hamas victory were to turn over 200 million shekels in tax revenues to the Hamas and then to send mounted police in to evict Jews from their homes in the settlement of Amona. In the coming Knesset elections in Israel, all three major parties are advocating the same basic strategic position: eviction of Jewish settlers from most of the West Bank without Arab quid pro quo, turning the other cheek when rockets land in Jewish areas, and continued support for a Palestinian state. Indeed, buried in the Israeli election news is the fact that Israeli voters have just lost their only ballot option to vote against the Oslo "peace process" and against the pursuit of peace through appeasement and self-abasement. The last holdout, the only party in the last parliament not promoting peace through appeasement, had been the Ichud Leumi party, itself a coalition of several smaller factions. The National Religious Party (NRP) or MAFDAL had been paying rhetorical lip service to opposing Oslo, although few believe it was really opposed. After all, the NRP had sat in Israeli government coalitions of both Labor and Likud that implemented earlier Oslo appeasements without batting an eyelash. One wag suggested that if Israel's government finally decided to move Israel back to its 1949 borders, the only concern of the NRP would be that the withdrawal not take place on the Sabbath. As a coalition partner, the NRP never had any problem abandoning its nominal opposition to Oslo in exchange for fiscal handouts to its party institutions and schools. The merging of Ichud Leumi with the NRP means, first of all, that the new party is abandoning the chance of retaining the votes of secularist Israeli voters opposed to Oslo - people repulsed by the NRP. In addition, any voter, of any level of religiosity, who casts a vote for this new party out of anti-Oslo conviction must know that there is a distinct chance of seeing his own vote perverted. How long will it take for the new party to sell out and cash in its Knesset support for some funds (dare I say 'pork'?) handed over to NRP institutions? The worse the failures of the Oslo process, the fewer the electoral possibilities for Israelis to oppose it. One fundamental plank in the Oslo peace process is to provide the Hamas entity with a "safe corridor" that links the Gaza Strip with the West Bank. Israel would be prohibited from stopping the movement of weapons, explosives, and terrorists along this "safe corridor." The Americans and the EU have been pressuring Israel to allow the operations of the "safe corridor" to begin immediately. Now that there is no Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip, there are also no obstacles to the massive importing of state-of-the-art advanced weapons into the area via Egypt. These likely include shoulder-fired missiles. There will be no more Kassams for Hamas, those pieces of junk held together by chewing gum and glue. The emerging Hamas terrorist army will have 21st-century hi-tech weapons. And the "safe corridor" will ensure that these also reach the West Bank. Shoulder missiles that can knock down civilian planes will be in the hands of Hamas terrorists positioned in areas over which planes fly when landing at and taking off from Ben Gurion Airport. The most amazing thing is that the Israeli political establishment has learned absolutely nothing from previous cases of implementation of "safe corridors." Israel's will not be the first. The most infamous is probably the "Polish Corridor" that Hitler demanded in 1939. When Poland was reconstituted after World War I, Danzig remained a free city and parts of East Prussia remained under German rule. After Hitler took power, ethnic Germans in Danzig formed a Nazi party and took control of the city. Following Hitler's success in cowing the West, winning all his demands at Munich, and then destroying Czechoslovakia, the next item on the Nazi agenda was a "safe corridor" between Germany proper and Danzig/East Prussia through Poland. Hitler was sure the West would again acquiesce and appease. But Poland dug in its heels and refused the demand for a safe corridor. Poland understood that the notion of a safe corridor represented the end of Polish sovereignty on its own territory - that it was little more than a tactic to divide Poland and make it more vulnerable to invasion. With Hitler's forces grouping in the West and the Red Army poised to conquer Poland from the East, Poland, friendless and poorly armed, still chose war rather than surrender to the demand for a "Polish Corridor." On September 1, 1939, Germany invaded Poland, with the Red Army following. After Poland's defeat, Danzig and the Polish Corridor, as well as much other territory in western Poland, were annexed to Germany. (After World War II, the entire German population of East Prussia and Danzig was expelled by Poland.) In recent years we have been hearing cries from the Israeli Left that the forthcoming "Palestinian state" must be provided with territorial "continuity." The only problem is that one look at the map shows that if a Palestinian state were to have territorial continuity, the Jewish state would lose its territorial continuity. This in fact is the point of the demand for a "safe corridor," which would simply be the first step toward constraining Israeli sovereignty, toward armed aggression against Israel and territorial dismemberment. The Polish government of 1939 understood that the "Polish Corridor" would amount to a first step on the path to self-annihilation and refused German demands. The Israeli political establishment has far less backbone and common sense. The "corridor" is not the only manifestation of the refusal of the Israeli elite to learn from history. Since the Hamas Putsch, we have been hearing arguments about how Abu Mazen will stay on as Palestinian president while Hamas "only" controls the Palestinian parliament. Supposedly this could mean that Abu Mazen will keep Hamas restrained. Speaking of historical precedents, this strongly resembles similar predictions made when Hitler took power and Paul von Hindenberg was Reich president. Von Hindenberg will keep Hitler restrained, was the accepted wisdom and media spin of that day. Of course, within a year von Hindenberg was dead and Hitler had seized all presidential powers. But don't bother telling any of that to Israel's leaders. They still prefer life in a fantasy bubble to learning from history.
Posted
2/22/2006 10:52:00 AM
1. More on anti-Semitic Jews: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21394 and http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395460108&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull And the Jews for a Second Holocaust are here: http://www.jfjfp.org/ 2. Nazis of a Feather: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/685642.html Will Chomsky join his Buddies in Iran to Deny the Holocaust? Well, as you know, nazi moonbats of a feather like to flock together. And now it turns out that the Holocaust Deniers in Iran are recruiting Western Holocaust Deniers, some who are faculty on American college campuses, to help the Iranian campaign for a Second Holocaust. Israel's leftist daily Haaretz reports that Holocaust-deniers from the West are playing a key role in attempts by Iran to cast doubts on the veracity of the Holocaust. Documents reveal Iranians have consulted with well-known Holocaust-deniers from Western countries as part of the Iranian initiative to hold a conference about the Holocaust. The documents were published on an Internet site involved in Holocaust denial and reached scholars at the Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism at Tel Aviv University. French Holocaust-denier Prof. Robert Faurisson has received a request regarding the Iran conference from Dr. Jawad Sharbaf, head of the Neda Institute of Political Sciences, Tehran. Faurisson added that "in accord with an idea put forth by Prof. Arthur Robert Butz [a Holocaust-denier from Northwestern University in the U.S.], I shall say we hope to see President Ahmadinejad create in Iran an international center for revisionist studies."Faurisson praised Ahmadinejad and added a request "that Iran make repeated appeals to the Western world for the freeing of our prisoners of conscience," referring to his colleagues convicted of denying the Holocaust. Now, the world's greatest fan of the "scholarship Of Robert Faurisson is none other than Noam Chomsky, Pol Pot's favorite MIT professor. Since Chomsky has long campaigned for the "freedom of speech" of Holocaust Deniers but not for neoconservatives, can there be any doubt that he will also wish to address the Iranian conference proving that Nazi German did not kill any Joos? According to the head of the Tel Aviv Roth Institute, Prof. Dina Porat, in recent years solidarity between Holocaust-deniers and extremist Muslims has increased. "Since the law has begun to be enforced regarding Holocaust-deniers, they often speak of the 'common fate of the persecuted,' which they feel they share with radical Muslims," Porat said. 3. Georgetown's jihad against civilization: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21405 4. Reforming Academic Hiring: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21398 5. Prager on Jews: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21403 6. The Harvard PC Hitpersons: Veritas at Harvard February 22, 2006; Page A14 A Harvard education isn't what it used to be. That's the principal lesson of yesterday's news that Lawrence Summers is resigning as the 27th president of the nation's oldest university. By "used to be," we mean the days before the faculty ran the academic asylum, the days when administrators, students and, yes, even the trustees also had a say in setting priorities and making decisions about how a great university is run. If you remember such a time, you probably graduated with the Class of 1965 or earlier. In a letter posted on Harvard's Web site yesterday, Mr. Summers said that "I have reluctantly concluded that the rifts between me and segments of the Arts and Sciences faculty make it infeasible for me to advance the agenda of renewal that I see as crucial to Harvard's future." Those "rifts" included quarrels with a largely left-wing faculty that has about as much intellectual diversity as the Pyongyang parliament. Or, as a group of Harvard protesters so charmingly put it a year or so ago, "Racist, sexist, anti-gay -- Larry Summers, you must pay." Only on an American university campus could Mr. Summers, a former Clinton Treasury Secretary, be portrayed as a radical neocon. Early in his tenure, Mr. Summers ran up against black studies superstar Cornel West, when he suggested that the scholar take time out from writing rap songs to do some serious academic work. He later bucked faculty who wanted Harvard to end its investments in Israel and warned that anti-Semitism was no longer just the purview of the ill-educated but is on the rise in elite institutions. He pushed for the return of ROTC to Harvard (without success) and told school audiences that the U.S. military deserves more respect than it was getting on campus. But his biggest transgression against current Harvard manners was his suggestion, at an academic conference a year ago, that it might be worth studying whether there are innate gender differences that might explain why so few women have reached the pinnacles of science and math. That much misquoted remark prompted a no-confidence vote by the Harvard Arts and Sciences faculty, a vote that was widely expected to be repeated next week. Mr. Summers's fate has unfortunately become all too typical at elite schools in recent decades. The Dartmouth faculty looked down on David McLaughlin as an "anti-intellectual" (he had an M.B.A. instead of a Ph.D.); he was run out of Hanover in 1987 over bitter quarrels over ROTC and disinvestment from South Africa. Benno Schmidt left Yale in 2001, saying his six-year tenure had been marked "by more argument . . . than I would have wished." Donald Kagan, the dean of Yale College who had handed in his resignation a few weeks earlier, was franker, noting the threat from an "imperial faculty." Mr. Summers isn't known for his bonhomie, and no doubt his personality didn't make him many friends. But it's also true that, in the wake of his "gender" comments, he bent over backward to apologize and to placate his liberal critics -- albeit to no avail. As one Harvard professor told us, Mr. Summers's retreat in the face of such criticism has left campus political dissenters even more isolated. On Harvard's coat of arms, a crimson field contains a trio of open books on which is imprinted the word "Veritas" -- Latin for "truth." In his first commencement address as president, Mr. Summers spoke of his vision of Harvard as a place "open to all ideas" and "committed to a diversity of perspectives." We wish Mr. Summers's successor good luck with that one. URL for this article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114057510944879735.html
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Posted
2/21/2006 02:42:00 PM
1. As Israel's election approaches, the most entertaining part of life in Israel is watching the Meretz version of "The Producers".
Let me explain. As you recall, "The Producers" was a highly successful and hilarious movie and Broadway show. (It is even now on the stage in translation to Hebrew in Tel Aviv.) It is based on the story of some theater producers who need to produce a terrible flop to extract themseles from financial difficulties, but a commercial success will ruin them. The semi-Marxist Meretz Party seems to be operating under the same modus operandi. It has designed its campaign and election slogans to guarantee that no one, not even the most devoted self-hating Israeli lemming, will vote for it. I wonder if a Gush Katif settler has hacked their web site and campaign computer? Since you will think that this is another of my spoofs, I direct you to this web page, http://meretz.org.il/elections/mod.php, where you can see the ads for yourself. The campaign began with billboards proclaiming that "Meretz is the Party of Arab Lovers", followed by "Meretz is the Party of Lovers of Homosexuals and Bleeding Hearts". But the cherry on the pie is the new one, which you can see on the above site, also at the entrance to Haifa on a huge billboard: A photo of Yossi Beilin's head with a banner proclaiming "I do not have an Arab Mother." The slogan is based on an old urban legend whispered about Isreal that Beilin supposedly had an Arab Mother. (Incorrect as it turns out.) It could explain a lot of his political behavior. The billboards will not only disgust a lot of Jews but no doubt enrage a lot of Arab voters, who are traditionally a significant part of the Meretz contingent. The only thing now missing would be a new ad, with Beilin in tights, dancing and prancing to the tune of "Springtime with Hitler in Germany", singing "Springtime with Hamas in Oslo". 2. Haaretz' Der Sturmer Headline Just when you think Haaretz could not possibly become any worse, along it comes to surprise us. Haaretz is the Israeli Far Leftist daily whose notion of journalistic plualism resembles that of Pravda back in the days of Brezhnev. It is little more than a Palestinian newspaper printed in Hebrew. The headline in Haaretz this morning is "The Candidate for the Army's Chief Rabbi: 'The Sabbath is More Important than the Life of Gentiles.'" At least that is the Hebrew headline. It is tuned down a bit in its English version, which you can see here: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=rabbi&itemNo=685158 The article tries to represent the person being considered for the army's chief rabbi slot (in charge of things like kosher food in the military and religious issues that come up) as a foaming racist and primitive bigot. The paper even notes that the rabbi's own children were opposed to the Gush Katif withdrawal. Oh the humanity! But reading the article fails to produce a single statement by the Rabbi that is consistent with the headline. So what gives? Well, it seems the Rabbi once discussed what should be done if the army captured a wounded terrorist on the sabbath. He discussed the religious considerations for whether one should violate the sabbath to save the life of a murderer/terrorist. Not exatly the same thing as saying that the Rabbi considers the sabbath more important than the life of gentiles, huh? The Rabbi actually reaches the conclusion that the sabbath MAY be violated to save the terrorist, although adds that this could be for purposes of allowing intelligence to interrogate him or to avoid fueling loathing of Jews. I personally think it would be obligatory to execute the terrorist, sabbath or not, but I am not exactly a rabbinic authority. Haaretz has a long history of Der-Sturmer-like caricatures and obscene representations of religious Jews and the paper for the thinking Israel is not at all troubled that nazis and anti-Semites all over the globe will latch on to its lying headline about an Israeli Rabbi from this morning. To read about past Haaretz anti-Semitic caricatures, see http://www.freeman.org/m_online/oct98/winston2.htm or http://www.gamla.org.il/english/article/1998/sept/win4.htm To get a better feel for what Haaretz is, consider last week's weekend magazine supplement in the paper for the thinking Israeli. The cover story was about a Haaretz writer who took a course in getting women into bed, featuring such advice as How to Screw a Lot of Women without being Nice to Them. It is accompanied by photos of sluts and bimbos. This was accompanied by an article by Post-Zionist Tom Segev in which he tells about how the BBC investigated whether the Israeli media or the Palestinians are better at reporting on the Middle East conflict (guess who Segev thinks does a better job). He expresses his anguish that the Hamas is still regarded by the BBC as a terrorist group. Then Haaretz runs its weekly feature by Gideon Levy, a person who has openly called for Israel to be destroyed and writes in Counterpunch. Levy each Friday runs a sob story about some Palestinian who was wounded, crippled, or otherwise is having a sad life. In most cases the po' Palestinian was shot or wounded as a result of Israelis returning fire after terrorists attack them, but Levy never mentions that. Levy has yet to express his anguish at the killing and maiming of any Jews. This week's Levy-Palestinian lost two legs from a shell Israel firedback at terrorists. This is followed by a piece about how a Far-Leftist anti-Zionist actor and playwriter in Israel (Yehoshua Sobel) is "in love with Amir Peretz". No, not in the Brokeback Mountain sense. Then there is an article on a brother and sister where the brother is about to have a sex change operation and the two are shown in a spread where they are naked and one can examine the bris of the brother about to become a sister in allits detail. Really. Haaretz weekend magazine also usually has a set of recipes for preparing shrimp, ham, or similar items. I mean, you would think they would leave out the ham recipes if only to avoid offending their Moslem readers. 3. Global Warming: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=19659 4. Che Entrepreneurship: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/19/INGMQH9Q5C1.DTL 5. Time to Indict some More Holocaust Deniers by Autonomist Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2006 at 1:51 AM Jail them! Well, David Irving is going to prison. He was convicted in Austria of being a Holocaust Denier, which is a crime in Austria. All very well, but why is ONLY David Irving going to prison? Why is not DePaul "University's" Norman Finkelstein going to Austrian prison, or DePaul's President Dennis Holtschneider for the crime of employing Finkelstein and defending his "scholarship"? The Anti-Defamation League has declared him to be a Holocaust denier. How about Northwestern University's Arthur Butz? How about Jeff Rense, who runs the Holocaust Denial web site Rense.com, and his assorted nazi columnists? How about the University of Ottawa's Michel Chossudovsky? And then there is the unemployed skinhead and Holocaust Denier, Kurt Nimmo, or the potty poet from New Mexico, as we affectionately like to refer to him. Nimmo's reaction to the conviction of Irving on his little personal web site? "Now that the .Notorious Holocaust Denier,. as the New York Times characterized David Irving, has pleaded guilty and faces three years in an Austrian prison for the crime of deviating from the official, Zionist-sanctioned and imposed history of the Second World War, we can expect triumphant ballyhoos from the Zionists, a screaming and obnoxious declaration of victory for the small outlaw nation of Israel and its endless blackmailing of millions of people who had nothing to do with Auschwitz and its discredited gas chambers. .Mr. Irving.s trial came during a period of intense debate in Europe over freedom of expression, after European newspapers printed caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that set off deadly protests worldwide,. notes the New York Times. In other words, straying from the Holocaust orthodoxy is a punishable crime while sacking the Prophet Muhammad is freedom of expression.' Nimmo, best known for his poems about his own hemorrhoids, used to be a regular columnist for Counterpunch until Alexander Cockburn fired his poetic posterior for his being a conspiracy nut. Nimmo likes to whine to his few readers how unfair it is to call him a nazi or Holocaust Denier. We figure the above citation sets the record straight. 6. Pipes on the Cartoon Jihad ... against HIM! http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21384 7. Academic jihadnette: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21369 8. Israel's next Munich? http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21368
Monday, February 20, 2006
Posted
2/20/2006 05:48:00 PM
1. Iran Takes Revenge ... On Danish Pastries Is there no limit to the barbarism of these Farsi occupiers of Iranian lands legitimately belonging to the Mongolians?
NOW they are persecuting ... Danish Pastries! From the Persian press we have learned that bakeries across the capital were covering up their ads for Danish pastries Thursday after the confectioners' union ordered the name change in retaliation for caricatures of the Muslim prophet published in a Danish newspaper. Iranians love Danish pastries, but when they look for the flaky dessert at the bakery they now have to ask for "Roses of the Prophet Muhammad." Iranians love sweets, often bringing candies and pastries to parties. So-called "Danish pastries" are extremely popular. "Given the insults by Danish newspapers against the prophet, as of now the name of Danish pastries will give way to 'Rose of Muhammad' pastries," the union said in its order. "This is a punishment for those who started misusing freedom of expression to insult the sanctities of Islam," said Ahmad Mahmoudi, a cake shop owner in northern Tehran. In Iran, the pastries are domestically baked, not imported. Iran has cut all commercial ties with Denmark in retaliation for the prophet cartoons. Meanwhile Bill Clinton has endorsed the persecution of the cartoon infidels, while on a visit to Pakistan, World News Daily reports. Clinton called for the conviction of European papers that published satirical cartoons of Muhammad, according to reports in the Islamic press and elsewhere. Clinton condemned the publication of the caricatures by European newspapers and urged countries concerned to convict the publishers, according to the reports. Clinton had nothing to say about whether the Seventh Commandment was something that deserved respect. 2. Cartoons out? Look what else is prohibited! http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48884 3. Lying about AIDS: http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=19619 4. Trouble in the Conspiracist Asylum: http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2006/02/conspiracy-creeps-trash-cockburn-on.html Conspiracy Creeps Trash Cockburn On 9/11 Surely, one of the last great pleasures in life is watching far-Left moonbats hiss and claw at one another. In particular, we cannot get enough of the barbs that some moonbats are throwing at Alexander Cockburn for his refusal to endorse the "theories" of conspiracy nuts regarding 9-11. As you may know, there is somewhat of a cottage industry composed of conspiracists who say that "controlled demolition" actually brought down the WTC, and that the tens of thousands of people who saw the hijacked planes hit the towers are either lying about what they saw or were mass hypnotized into seeing things that never occurred. Now while we happen to think that Cockburn himself should have been shipped over to Gitmo and placed in a holding cell with the terrorists he supports, we are pleased that he showed some uncharacteristic good sense in telling-off the conspiracy kooks, even though in the past Cockburn himself spent as much time promoting loony conspiracy "theories" as they do. Cockburn once even claimed that the Jews spread anthrax and Israel was involved in the 9-11 attacks. Nevertheless, Cockburn has recently ripped into those who are only slightly more loony than him: "The truly bad news is the 9/11 nuts have relocated to Stolen Election. My inbox is awash with their ravings. People who have spent the last three years sending me screeds establishing to their own satisfaction that George Bush personally ordered the attacks on the towers and that Dick Cheney vectored the planes in are now pummeling me with data on the time people spent on line waiting to vote in Cuyahoga county, Ohio, and how the Diebold machines are all jimmied. As usual, the conspiracy nuts think that plans of inconceivable complexity worked at 100 per cent efficiency, that Murphy's law was once again in suspense, and that 10,000 co-conspirators are all going to keep their mouths shut." We mentioned yesterday that the "Poet of the Posterior," neo-nazi Kurt Nimmo, squealed outrage at Cockburn for not embracing psychotic conspiracism. Nimmo claims this makes Cockburn a "gatekeeper" in the neocon conspiracy, by which we assume Nimmo means "Jewish." Meanwhile, other conspiracy nuts are sniping at Comrade Cockburn from the web. Here is a typical example. (Ah, witness what happens when some people avoid taking their prozac!) This particular moonbatling writes: "As a '9/11 nut,' I'm gong to have to take this one personally. Regardless that ample evidence exists of vote fraud - which could have flipped the presidential outcome (a matter of concern to most of the world) - I'm going to have to concentrate on September 11th and your crass dismissal of valid lines of inquiry. ...On my side, I have several gigabytes of news articles, half a dozen lawsuits by FBI insiders, and the following reading list (he lists some other loony blogs)...Where you see '10,000 co-conspirators,' Bush and Cheney would no-doubt see 10,000 pawns. They aren't 'co-conspirators' if they don't know they are part of a much larger plan. It would be tough to argue that plausible deniability isn't one of the Bush family values....In your (ignorant) scenario, the air defenses of the nation were asleep at the controls for some unnamed reason. They just allowed airliners to fly all over the northeast unescorted, and in the case of the Pentagon crash: for over 70 minutes. That's your story, and I guess you're sticking to it." Other conspiracy moonbats are fluttering out of their caves to attack Cockburn. Since poor Alexander has now criticized his fellow moonbats, we would not be surprised to see some of them accuse him of having set the demolition charges that they think brought the Towers down.
Posted
2/20/2006 11:00:00 AM
You may recall that Kurt Nimmo, the "Poet of the Posterior" who writes "poetry" about his own hemorrhoids, used to be a regular columnist for Alexander Cockburn's Counterpunch web magazine. While Counterpunch is a leftwing web site for Bash-America rants, it is also one of the most openly anti-Semitic web sites in America.
Cockburn hates Jews even more than he hates America (although he doesn't hate America enough to give up its perqs and move back to his native rainy British isles). Cockburn published a book, "The Politics of Anti-Semitism," devoted to the thesis that people should not be accused of being anti-Semites just because they hate Jews and want to see Jews murdered. And to make his point, Cockburn even included an anti-American and anti-Semitic rant by our potty poet, Kurt Nimmo, in that book.
Nimmo's chapter included such delicious fabrications as: "As for Baraka's assertion that both the US and Israeli government had prior knowledge of the September 11 attacks, there is clear, ample, and documented evidence they most certainly did."
But Nimmo, who is a high school dropout associated with a variety of Holocaust denier organizations and individuals, was too openly a Neo-Nazi and too much of a flake even for Cockburn and his Counterpunch friends. When Nimmo decided that the US and Israel had really knocked down the WTC on 9-11 to make the poor al-Qaeda people look bad, this was just too much, even for Comrade Cockburn, who canned Nimmo's poetic posterior, and has since refused to run any of Nimmo's rants in Counterpunch.Nimmo likes to post his inventions on the newsletter put out by the open Holocaust Deniers at the Barnes Review. Nimmo is also buddies with Jeff Rense, who runs the Rense.com web site. Nimmo insists that Rense himself is not a Holocaust Denier, in spite of the fact that his web site runs hundreds of Holocaust denial articles and promotes "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," so we are waiting to see if Rense sues Nimmo for libel because Nimmo claims that Rense is NOT a Holocaust Denier. Nimmo by the way has appeared on Rense's web site at least 64 times. (Yahoo Search has a much larger number.)Nimmo, a chronically unemployed photographer-wannabe, has been proclaimed "One of the Ten Best Writers on the Web" by one John Kaminski, who himself is also an unemployed neo-nazi Holocaust denier and Rense columnist, someone who promotes 9-11 conspiracist lunacy along with Nimmo. Nimmo has also praised Kaminski in quid pro quo, lending credence to my theory that nazis of a feather flock together in the same cyber-asylums.Meanwhile, Nimmo runs a rant on his best-ignored personal web page this weekend in which he tries to explain away why Cockburn dumped him from Counterpunch. While one would be hard pressed to find a single sentence Nimmo has ever written about anything that is either factually correct or grammatically correct, Nimmo outdoes himself in his "Correcting the Record on My Stint Writing for Counterpunch." Here is Nimmo's version of getting the Cockburn axe:
"Cockburn had received negative comments (this apparently irked him) about documentation (sic) I cited indicating government involvement in the terrorist attacks of nine eleven, thus revealing Counterpunch's gatekeeping function, a common enough occurrence on the foundation-funded left (according to the research of Bob Feldman and tax forms, in 1999 CP and the Institute for the Advancement of Journalistic Clarity earned $178,000) from its 'alternative journalism activity' and unlike most of the other anti-conspiracist alternative media gatekeepers." In other words, Nimmo was indeed fired by Cockburn, as everyone already knew, for being a subliterate kook and a downright embarrassment for Counterpunch, but Nimmo is now trying to "get even" by claiming that Counterpunch is a part of the neocon conspiracy, a.k.a. "gatekeeping function." Evidently being a gatekeeper is something like a "Zionist" in the Nimmo-Kaminski Hofbrauhaus.
Nimmo also whines that Cockburn never paid him anything, which I suppose might have been a blessing for our potty poet because it may have allowed him to receive food stamps.
Friday, February 17, 2006
Posted
2/17/2006 12:03:00 PM
1. Yesterday something extraordinary happened in Israel. The Israeli authorities refused to let three vicious anti-Semites enter Israel. This of course is unusual and entirely out of character for Israel, which ordinarily welcomes foreign anti-Semites and then sends them to the West Bank where they can vandalize Israel's security fence and violently attack soldiers and police.
So what made Israel behave with sudden uncharacteristic survivalist dignity yesterday? Well, first of all, the three were so obviously anti-Semites that Israel's far-leftist daily Haaretz referred to them as "peace activists". The three were from the fanatically anti-Israel "European Jews for a Just Peace". The "just peace" they have in mind is where all the Israeli Jews have been shipped out in cattle cars to nice work camps. See http://www.ejjp.org/ . EJJP claims to represent 18 different leftist anti-Jewish groups of European Jews, but we suspect all 18 groups have the same 8 members. There are only 8 people listed here as members http://www.ejjp.org/main.asp?pagid=8 and several have clearly non-Jewish names. The terror leader of this group is one Dror Feiler. You probably remember Feiler as the Swedish ex-Israeli "sculptor" who created a "work of art" celebrating the mass murderer suicide bomber woman who murdered 23 people in a Haifa restaurant, including members of three generations of a single family. One child lost his parents and was left alive, blinded. The bomber beloved by Feiler intentionally stood next to a baby carriage when she set the bomb off to make sure the baby was blown to bits. The bomber was a West Bank lawyer, not a starving refugee. Feiler's "art show" compared her to Snow White in her purity. Feiler was raised a red diaper baby by his communist mother Pnina Feiler, then moved to Sweden. When the Israeli Ambassador to Sweden saw the atrocity that Feiler had created to celebrate the mass murderer, he vandalized it. Israel's Lefties then had a conniption at this "destruction of art". Feiler became the overnight hero for the Sormfront organization of Nazis and Holocaust Deniers: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?mode=hybrid&t=110784 When he is not busy celebrating genocide and mass murder of Jews, Feiler serves as "chairman" of the "European Jews for a Just Peace". Yesterday three of the group's members were busted when they arrived at Tel Aviv airport. They were supposed to hook up with Palestinian terrorists and Israeli leftist thugs and help attack Israeli police protecting Israel's security fence near the village of Bil'in. After busting them, Feiler himself gave a press briefing in which he said, "There is no other country on earth that behaves like this!" He is of course correct. In any other country, overseas trouble-makers coming in to assist genocidal terrorists would be taken out back and shot, or at least shipped off to Gitmo. Feiler's campaign for genocidal terrorism was earlier discussed by us here: http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=5654 We reprint some earlier observations about him: 'Ah, the Israeli left! Every days brings us new wonders from it, new manifestations of anti-Semitism and treason. 'Among the Israeli or ex-Israeli leftist anti-Semites trekking the globe is one Mapplethropian ''artist'' named Dror Feiler. Feiler hates Israel with a passion and supports Jihad and Palestinian terrorism. He lives in Stockholm with his Swedish wife whence he spreads his views, including on the Internet. He also claims to be a musician who makes ''music and noise'' and my guess is more of the latter than the former. (http://www.furious.com/perfect/drorfeiler.html ) 'Among Feiler's recent ''artistic'' creations is a work celebrating the terrorist woman who blew herself up inside the Maxim restaurant in Haifa, murdering 23 people, some of them Arabs, many of the children. Feiler seems to think this woman is a great hero, so he drew a portrait of her floating happily in a pool of Jewish blood. The work is entitled Snow White and the Madness of Truth (http://www.makingdifferences.com/site/calendar.php?id=20 ). It was displayed in Sweden in a museum, the Historiska Museet, together with a poem that included the following phrases: 'She was also a woman as white as snow, as red as blood, and her hair was as black as ebony. like a weed in her heart until she had no peace day and night Hanadi Jaradat was a 29-year-old lawyer Weeping bitterly, she added: "If our nation cannot realize its dream and the goals of the victims, and live in freedom and dignity, then let the whole world be erased "Run away, then, you poor child. and the red looked beautiful upon the white.'' 'It was all part of the preparations for some sort of Swedish conference on ''genocide,'' which by all expectations will end up endorsing Arab plans to conduct genocide against Jews. 'The art was on display in Stockholm when the Israeli Ambassador decided to respond to it in a manner almost unseen by Israeli officials since the start of Oslo appeasement. He responded to it as a Jew and a Zionist; after asking nicely that it be taken down, he vandalized the obscenity. Curiously, the Ambassador is an appointee of Labor Party dove Ehud Barak, who was on Israeli TV soon afterwards cheering on the Ambassador for this rare act of Israeli self-pride and courage. Surprisingly, Barak's party and Meretz have NOT suggest that Feiler be granted the Israel Prize. 'Feiler runs a PLO front group called Jews for Israeli Palestinian Peace (JIPF). He also serves as head of European Jews for a Just Peace, which might or might not have other members besides himself. The artist has filed a complaint with the Swedish police against the Ambassador for the vandalizing, and it set off a diplomat confrontation between Sweden and Israel. I personally think the Ambassador should say he was just engaging in theater and so his actions should be protected artistic expression. '''This was not a piece of art,'' the ambassador told Sweden's SR radio news station. ''It was a monstrosity. For me it was intolerable and an insult to the families of the victims,'' he said. ''As ambassador [of] Israel I could not remain indifferent to such an obscene misrepresentation of reality.'' 'Feiler describes himself as the ''eye-bleeding ultimate composer of intifadic and eruptive lung-outs.'' It turns out his parents were both communist party members in Israel and he was raised on a kibbutz. 'What is most interesting about this is how readily much of the Israeli Left has been to denounce the ambassador for defending Jewish dignity and to defend the anti-Semitic artist and his absolute right to produce such obscenity. The far leftist daily Haaretz ran an editorial, several op-eds and lots of letters to the editor denouncing the ambassador as a bully and vandal and defending the piece of ''art.'' They were joined by many others on the Israeli Left. Suddenly ''artistic'' expression is absolutely protected. Except the theater by the Ambassador is not. 'Some in the academic Left are also chiming in. Here is a letter written by Prof. Amiram Goldblum, one of the founders and long-time leaders in Peace Now, circulated this week on the web: '''The Stockholm Bully'' The aggressive response of Mazel to what seems to be an idiotic artistic expression, will remain in public memory as another display of Israeli violence, deriving from 35 years of occupation. That is also the source of the governmental response, praising the bully rather than recalling him and replacing him ASAP. Israel has enough rednecks in the academy, no need to have them as diplomats. 'Amiram Goldblum, Ph.D. Cell Professor of Medicinal Chemistry School of Pharmacy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem ISRAEL 91120 email: amiram@vms.huji.ac.il 'Now it is interesting to place this sudden absolutism of the Left regarding artistic expression in context. This is the very same Israeli Left that insists that any poster that shows politicians the Left likes in unflattering manner, such as Yossi Beilin or Yossi Sarid wearing an Arab kafiya, should be grounds for prosecution for ''incitement.'' This is the same Left that cheered uncontrollably when Tatiana Suskin, the poor young woman who had made a poster of the Prophet Mohammed as a pig, was sentenced to a long prison term. These are leftists who want pornography suppressed because it dishonors women. This is the same Israeli Left that has campaigned to tear down and bulldoze a memorial stone marker for Baruch Goldstein, who shot up the Mosque in Hebron. And this is the Left that argues that T-shirts that read "Where there are no Arabs there is no Terrorism" should be jailed for "racism" and "incitement". 'In other words, by defending this nazi obscenity in Sweden, the Left is showing how openly anti-Semitic and anti-democratic it is. Here is some more on the Jewish anti-Semites in Europe: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=5175 2. Haifa University's Ilan Pappe endorses Holocaust Denier Norman Finkelstein: http://normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=132 3. Tikkun Endorses Pappe and other anti-Semites: http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0601/lockard 4. Ben Dror Yemini, a left of center columnist and editor at Maariv, calls for preventing Palestinians getting Israeli citizenship by way of marriage: (in Hebrew - http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/048/456.html) There is a massive in-migration of Palestinians into Israel by way of marrying Israeli Arabs and applying for citizenship. Yemini calls for a halt to this. He will of course be denounced as a racist by the usual members of the Jews for a Second Holocaust. 5. More Israeli First Amendement: http://israelnn.com/news.php3?id=98657 6. Feminazis: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21226 7. California Public Schools for Jihad: http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21334 8. Will this guy now be hired by the Dept of Political Science at Ben Gurion University? http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2117 9. Will Amir Peretz merge with these? http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/683821.html 10. Appeasement 101: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0206/hanson021606.php3 11. Bunnies: http://forum.chronwatch.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25429
|